Yes it does. I would enjoy a remaster. Which I know will never happen.lol
Even a X enhance patch would be awesome. Running it straight up in the X is an improvement, but still looks like turd
Yes it does. I would enjoy a remaster. Which I know will never happen.lol
Yes. Tides of War will add stuff as the war progresses. Only a matter of time before the Americans and Japanese are added along with their theatre of war maps, weapons, armour, etc. I would imagine thhe Russians will be added at some point too.Yeah Battlefield 1 did a great job. At least you felt like you were playing a game set during WW1.
I'm not quite understanding what Dice is doing with BF5. Are they moving things along in sequence with WW2?
wow i agree with this personBF4 is better then BF1 imo. BFV is a improvement over BF1 by quite a bit though.
They're going to add the pacific theater?I
Yes. Tides of War will add stuff as the war progresses. Only a matter of time before the Americans and Japanese are added along with their theatre of war maps, weapons, armour, etc. I would imagine thhe Russians will be added at some point too.
Most likely.They're going to add the pacific theater?
I did read that Stalingrad will be added at some point.
Most likely.
Content is a big problem. Not enough new maps.I respect that they are doing the time progression thing. What's funny is the same people complaining about not having iconic battles in there are the same ones saying they are burnt out on WW2 and they should go modern.
It would be a very different thing if they were going with a paid DLC model. With everything being free, the only legit complaint may be lack of stuff.
I really hope this model works. EA is doing this one right, but if they aren't making enough money long term, they are going to cut down on the updates. I worry about them making money off of cosmetics. I know I would never buy them, I really don't care what camo pattern my pants are.
Content is a big problem. Not enough new maps.
The Coop mode doesn't go live til Feburary. Rush don't go live till March and the goes away after 2 weeks. Just not enough and too spread out.
I think this game will be dead by Summer uhless Firestorm is amazing.
True about the need 4 content.Content is a big problem. Not enough new maps.
The Coop mode doesn't go live til Feburary. Rush don't go live till March and the goes away after 2 weeks. Just not enough and too spread out.
I think this game will be dead by Summer uhless Firestorm is amazing.
If the first is the true then the latter is inevitable. They need something big, maybe Firestorm will be it. But niche modes like squad conquest, combined arms are not going to keep the masses around. Keeping Rush as a timed event inorder to fill out later chapters wont keep the masses around. 2 maps every 3-4 months wont keep the masses around.True about the need 4 content.
LOL@it being dead by the summer.
So many anti EA trolls on YouTube say dumb things like ths with the actual fans enjoying the game.
Agreed that there aren't enough maps, but they are coming so that's good. How small is the userbase? Are there numbers out there?If the first is the true then the latter is inevitable. They need something big, maybe Firestorm will be it. But niche modes like squad conquest, combined arms are not going to keep the masses around. Keeping Rush as a timed event inorder to fill out later chapters wont keep the masses around. 2 maps every 3-4 months wont keep the masses around.
Dead doesn't mean nobody plays either. Simply that it only keeps a small dedicated userbase, and considering the game has a significantly small userbase to begin with, means the shrinkage will be quicker than ever.
I hope it doesn't happen, but based on the content thus far, it isn't enough. Which why, I think, Firestorm is such an important mode.
I would leave support until they fixx bipods, hopefully later this month.Agreed that there aren't enough maps, but they are coming so that's good. How small is the userbase? Are there numbers out there?
I'm still having a blast with this game. My buds and I have figured out our squad. Played exclusively medic last night, think it's my new favorite class. Might try out support soon.
BF games are always in that 2nd tier. Smaller (relative to the big games) but dedicated playerbase. The game isn't for everyone and isn't going to have COD/Fortnite numbers. The only sort of unofficial numbers you can get is you can sort the Xbox store by most played. BF V is always solidly on the 2nd page with games like D2. It is never going to run with the heavy hitters.
SW BF2 still has a decent player base, so nobody should worry about this game. If that game can overcome that major drama, BF V will be fine.
One thing I really like about this game is the classes are all different enough to be fun. Playing a medic is very different from other classes.
BF1 did CoD numbers.
Thanks for the tip.I would leave support until they fixx bipods, hopefully later this month.
If you want to go support you can stick with the non-bipod guns like the KE7. It got a nerf but is still useable.
I would leave support until they fixx bipods, hopefully later this month.
They are clunky, don't stay inplace, way too limited movement.What’s up with the bi-pods?
No. BF1 sold 25 million.I didn't know that, but wasn't that more COD having a bad few years? Now that they added BR the game is back. I don't remember the WW2 game having great numbers and I know the later modern games were terrible. I don't remember seeing BF1 being that big but I honestly didn't check regularly. I know it had a bunch of people, and seemed to pull in more for some reason.
They are clunky, don't stay inplace, way too limited movement.
and yes the KE7 does have a bipod. However, you don't need to use it...same with the Lewis Gun.
Is it just me or I just can not find any sights I like other than iron sight or a scope when I want to hit people at range.