You’re right, enough said. Professionally calibrated had no difference compared to my settings.
Calibrator was blind or you're blind, or placebo. Not sure which one tho...
You’re right, enough said. Professionally calibrated had no difference compared to my settings.
I guess you’re looking to justify paying a fee to access the advance settings of your TV?Comparing a ISF calibrated high end screen where they use professional machines to calibrate the TV to tweaking basic settings accessible to the consumer is like saying Youtube HD or 4K is as good as Blu Ray or Ultra HD Blu Ray.
I guess you’re looking to justify paying a fee to access the advance settings of your TV?
So you have an extrem bias at play, as I suspected. I thought it was justification for spending money. It turns out it’s justification for a close friend’s business.I have a friend in the business and he brings over his equipment and does it for free for me, so I don't know what you think I am trying to justify? And if you think it's just "accessing the advanced settings of the TV" well, then you are severely ignorant to the fact just as I expected.
So you have an extrem bias at play, as I suspected. I thought it was justification for spending money. It turns out it’s justification for a close friend’s business.
Professionals have the same access to settings that the public does for their tv. The only thing professionals have are measuring equipment that can tweak sets on a imperceivable level. There’s no reason to get a home TV set professionally calibrated with the wealth of information available.
Except I’m not talking about my tv. I’m talking about OLED, my friends TV. But continue to fail at supporting your very antiquated belief that people should get their TVs calibrated. Unless you’re completely inept, you can get professional level calibration using a widely used starting point and tweaking for your room conditions and very slight variances in panel production.Na, you're wrong sir, but you've got 1 more strike until you have to go back to the bench.
Ya it's not worth getting "TCL" TV's calibrated seeing as they are low end. I said high end TV's, not Walmart specials.
Except I’m not talking about my tv. I’m talking about OLED, my friends TV. But continue to fail at supporting your very antiquated belief that people should get their TVs calibrated. Unless you’re completely inept, you can get professional level calibration using a widely used starting point and tweaking for your room conditions and very slight variances in panel production.
As I said, you’re loooking to justify a nearly worthless profession for consumer use.
The TCL's are better performing then the LG LCD's you have.Na, you're wrong sir, but you've got 1 more strike until you have to go back to the bench.
Ya it's not worth getting "TCL" TV's calibrated seeing as they are low end. I said high end TV's, not Walmart specials.
The TCL's are better performing then the LG LCD's you have.
Reading is fundamental. I’ll try to make it really simple. Friend has OLED. We calibrated it. Looked good. He wanted to get it professionally done since it’s all the rage. Professionally calibrated it. Imperceptible difference. Professionally calibrating consumer sets is absolutely worthless and has been for a long while.So you have no high end TV and have never had your TV professionally calibrated by a ISF certified tech ? Alrighty then. That's what I thought. I have no skin in this game other than me seeing a difference. However I am one of those guys that can tell the difference between 900p and native 1080p and feel and see the difference between 30-60+ FPS and that the world is round......
Ok but they still 2 years later make worse LCD sets then TCL/Vizio/Hisense.Ya the LG I got was literaly the first 4K Dolby Vision TV out on the market and I got it 2 years ago. It's tough being an early adopter i guess. It'll get replaced in few years by something nice. Now almost every Walmart TV is 4K HDR.
Hisense is junk regardless of PQ.Ok but they still 2 years later make worse LCD sets then TCL/Vizio/Hisense.
IF Picture quality is what you care about.
I have a friend in the business and he brings over his equipment and does it for free for me, so I don't know what you think I am trying to justify? And if you think it's just "accessing the advanced settings of the TV" well, then you are severely ignorant to the fact just as I expected.
Categories like color accuracy, motion, uniformity, video processing, gaming lag, etc. doesn't change whether you watch the TV in a bright or dark room. The OLED TVs still dominated in those categories. And in the highly publicized HDTVTest 2017 shoot out, they also had a bright room category in which there were 2 sub-categories: light output (winner: LG B7 OLED) and anti-reflection filter (winner: Samsung Q9). So the rigging argument is moot. With their highly touted light output, the LED-lit LCDs should have won the HDR category but they didn't.Just read an article that those TV shootouts OLEDs consistently win are generally done in theater conditions (a dark room)? If true it would seem those tests are basically rigged to the strengths of those sets.
It will be a long time before a console has the power to get the most out of HDMI 2.1.....
The main features of HDMI 2.1 are 4K at HIGHER than 60hz(up to 120) 444 chroma 4k with 10/12 bit color.That doesn't make sense. Theoretically, if consoles were more powerful, wouldn't that eliminate the need for HDMI 2.1? If games were all locked at 60fps, there would be less need for it. My understanding is that HDMI 2.1 eliminates the screen tearing and other issues when systems can't keep up with the demands of the game. That a game could theoretically run at 45 FPS or at any frame rate and not just 30 and 60.