Amazon Spies On Their Drivers - And Other News

karmakid said:
Dono, might depend on where and how it’s facing. Like if all that’s visible is private property then nope, but if like a greater percentage is facing just public viewing space then maybe, but I feel like there’s need to be terms of agreement and allowance m, cos they’re essentially using your wifi and internet provider, so there should be a finical kick back to tap into something one pays for. We are paying for them to do everything else and now we’re paying to use our services twice, not feeling that. Or allow us to us tap into their streams instead of having to fill out or request it through all their policy formalities
Click to expand...
I am talking doorbells only.
 
Kvally said:
I am talking doorbells only.
Click to expand...
I know, but there’s a difference between a door bell that faces a private hallway/area versus one that faces a public street and side walk. Like a friend got a ticket for drinking on his porch/wet-room because it was visible to the public, and got a ticket for public intoxication.
 
I have been summoned yet again. Any footage that is captured by privately-owned cameras is subject to the terms of the agreement between the customer and the camera company. That agreement might say something to the effect that the company will cooperate with law enforcement requests for footage.

There is stricter scrutiny that applies if that footage captures video of areas that are not within view of public areas (such as inside a house, where there's a reasonable expectation of privacy).

Similar to this discussion is whether law enforcement may legally subpoena text messages, voicemails, or other cell phone data. The same reasoning applies.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: karmakid
aceattorney said:
I have been summoned yet again. Any footage that is captured by privately-owned cameras is subject to the terms of the agreement between the customer and the camera company. That agreement might say something to the effect that the company will cooperate with law enforcement requests for footage.

There is stricter scrutiny that applies if that footage captures video of areas that are not within view of public areas (such as inside a house, where there's a reasonable expectation of privacy).

Similar to this discussion is whether law enforcement may legally subpoena text messages, voicemails, or other cell phone data. The same reasoning applies.
Click to expand...
Thank you for the insight oh hallowed one, one day I shall buy you lunch, maybe kbbq, as a token of my appreciation for descending to our level
 
  • Winner
Reactions: aceattorney
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back