From the article:
"What's the ultimate goal of Project Stream? While Google's yet to say one way or another, it's very possible that this will tie into reports from earlier this year of Google working on its own gaming console called "Yeti." We already know that Yeti will have a focus on cloud-based streaming, so it only seems logical that Project Stream is our first introduction to that."
So it's unlikely to be a console killer, any more than MS or Sony's streaming services are console killers.
Game Pass downloads the game and PS Now is now allowing downloading of (PS4) games.
It's hard to imagine anything killing sony for me. So much what makes ps4 worth every penny is the exclusives. Can I play God of War on chrome?
Eventually yes, you will be able to.
I got into Google's Project Stream. And while its does not look as good as a dedicated console or PC, it works. I played Assassins Creed: Odyssey and for the most part it was enjoyable and most importantly playable. For non-graphic snobs and casuals, this may be for them.
I've got a 100 Mbps connection and while my I played, my wife watched an Amazon Prime Video and there was minimal latency and lag. Now for twitch shooters and competitive games, this will not be the answer. But single player games? This could be the next big thing IF priced correctly.
Now while I will never give up my dedicated consoles or PC, I can see some viablity with this project. Now I'm curious about how well Microsoft's streaming service will be.
Have you tested the latency when your wife wasn't watching Amazon Prime?
Was it like a 60fps game, or 30? I know that not all games need 60, but I'd hate to not have the option for certain genres..OK I've given it another try, this time without anything else running on my network.
Again it works and works surprisingly well. I did lose connection to their servers momentarily this time around, maybe due to my router or my ISP but when it came back up, I started at where I stopped at. Ethernet is the preferred way to play versus wifi it seems.
Its by NO means the definitive way to play. While the game is very responsive and the lag and latency was virtually not noticeable, the game's visuals, for lack of a better term looked like there was "butter on the lens". Without having the game on consoles I can't definitely say, but I'd wager the base Xbox 1 version of the game looks better than what I was playing. The stream seems to struggle to keep the game-play clear instead of fuzzy. I don't know what resolution the game is running as there are no graphic options but I'd say at best its between 720p and 900p. So to recap the game was responsive to the controls but the visual were just passable not great
Overall, this is a decent start to viable streaming. I still stand by this will not be for me personally as local hardware is still vastly superior for the way I like to play ( high framerate and/or superior visuals) but it might be a viable way to play for people who don't want to invest in the hardware/consoles.
Was it like a 60fps game, or 30? I know that not all games need 60, but I'd hate to not have the option for certain genres..