Kotaku: WTF? Hypocracy? What?

Frozpot

Well-Known Member
Sep 13, 2013
13,275
5,384
3,629
Ok, normally I'm all for this kind of thing, but given that it's Kotaku, and their history of criticism of "objectification", what do you guys think of this? Click-baiting? Attention seeking? What? I've got to say that it's a bit interesting to see this site posting this.

https://www.kotaku.com.au/2017/02/nsfw-overwatch-cosplay-was-the-star-of-the-show/

What's even "worse" it that it is so very barely cosplay. More like Lingerie with a couple related props. I will say it's bad taste to be so critical of this sort of thing, and then engage in it... Cake and eat it too? Thoughts?
 
Ok, normally I'm all for this kind of thing, but given that it's Kotaku, and their history of criticism of "objectification", what do you guys think of this? Click-baiting? Attention seeking? What? I've got to say that it's a bit interesting to see this site posting this.

https://www.kotaku.com.au/2017/02/nsfw-overwatch-cosplay-was-the-star-of-the-show/

What's even "worse" it that it is so very barely cosplay. More like Lingerie with a couple related props. I will say it's bad taste to be so critical of this sort of thing, and then engage in it... Cake and eat it too? Thoughts?
Getting clicks because of hot women. They have a couple of guys, may be the same guy, so they can't be called out for 'objectifying women.'
 
Getting clicks because of hot women. They have a couple of guys, may be the same guy, so they can't be called out for 'objectifying women.'
It's like all the hollywood hypocrites wearing their "Me Too" buttons.

To be clear, I have no issues if ladies wanna dress up all hotness as long as it's their choice. I will gladly consume this media! It's the holier-than-thou, pretentious, condescending posturing they do, then turn and engage in it when it suits them.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Registered User 1
Sorry Bellybama since you’re our resident Aussie/Asian Is the metoo movement huge in Australia as well? For those ignorant like myself who don’t really keep up with the media and world news
 
I can't stand the double standard stuff that goes on, women are supposed to be better than men yet are helpless and need white nights at every turn, they can dress how they want but you are a pig if you notice them showing everything but their nipples and what their second hair style is because "they aren't dressing that way to get attention" (Bull). Not all women do this but plenty do, just like not all men are pigs but many are and on that point if you want to see what pigs women can be just get a group of them around some firemen and see what happens, they are like male construction workers when a woman in a short skirt walks by lol.

Just look at that stupid story that was put out the other day about Aziz Ansari, it was another girl trying to get attention for "sexual assault" which it wasn't, thankfully a good amount of people are saying the story sounds like revenge porn but there are still plenty of women supporting it as well.
 
Sorry Bellybama since you’re our resident Aussie/Asian Is the metoo movement huge in Australia as well? For those ignorant like myself who don’t really keep up with the media and world news
I'm a bad person to ask about that... My version of politics is "f*** everyone, and then their horse they rode in on."

But I have no issue with them displaying the photoshoot. The title of the article is click-bait, but I wouldn't call anything about it exploitive.

I recognise three of those girls and two of the guys, and they're actors/models. Two of the girls are bio-drag-queens(females who dress up as men dressing up as women) who host a panel at drag-con, and one of the guys is an underwear model, and the other was a dancer On "Hey Qween!"

It's a video-game themed lingerie shoot, posted on a videogame site with 3 warnings before you get to the exposed stuff.

The models going into it would have known what the vibe of the shoot was going to be, and you'd have to willingly know what the subject matter is to reach the photos.

And generalising how "women" are and double standards is pretty rediculous in regards to this shoot. That's like saying all men are rapists (hello Female Eunuch) and are abusive wife bashers, because they play football. (They may be, I don't trust footballers) There's an entire spectrum of people, but it's generally the loudest who bring change, and most of the time they've got some s***ty stuff to say, to go along with all the good stuff.

We've had 150 years of women's suffrage, and there's still inequality on both sides of the spectrum, and we now have women and men saying they "hate feminists" without understanding what feminism is.

A woman wears a short dress and she can be considered "fair game" for heckling. But at the same time, a bloke can walk up the street shirtless exposing his nipples, but a woman will get charged with multiple offences.

The fact that these women were afforded the same chance as the men, IS feminism. Both sexes could be considered exploited, but at the same time they've gotten some brilliant photos and pullouts for their look-see folios, to help them get future middling gigs.

As far as the complaint about Kotaku, they could post whatever imo. They're written as oppinion articles most of the time, by the same 3 writers. They're also the same articles that generate a lot of clicks, and by far the most derision.

The only thing that I could consider exploitive about it all, is that the costume designer managed to bring in heaps of clicks for some REALLY AVERAGE designs. (Although I do like Stella's shot with the horns)
 
It's like all the hollywood hypocrites wearing their "Me Too" buttons.

To be clear, I have no issues if ladies wanna dress up all hotness as long as it's their choice. I will gladly consume this media! It's the holier-than-thou, pretentious, condescending posturing they do, then turn and engage in it when it suits them.
The Media's only job is to get stories thrown at you until you look at it.

It's not like any of these sites actually have credibility.

Kotaku generally post more-progressive op-ed pieces. They also show more risque stuff that could be construed as offensive. I like the mix.

But relying on them for a narrow, controlled message, would be like relying on BuzzFeed to keep you updated about the political climate in Syria.

They cut out their niche, and then they regurgitate 200 articles out of the successful stuff.

Look at Cosmopolitan magazine. In a single issue, there can articles about how to deal with work place sexual harrassment, how to deal with your best friend being raped, how to get blemish free skin from orgasms, and the best way to suck dick on a plane.

They seemingly don't belong together in the one publication, but why shouldn't they?

(And before anyone goes and slags off Cosmo, go do some googling. Some of the most important articles in women's lib have been published there when other mediums were afraid.)