Sony Might Owe You Money, Here's Why

menace-uk-

menace-uk-

Starfield Gazer
Sep 11, 2013
37,416
15,448
3,930
Six years later, Sony settles a class-action lawsuit related to the PlayStation 3

The ability to install Linux was one of the reasons some users purchased the older PlayStation 3 model, so when Sony locked out support for this in 2010, not everyone was happy. A class-action lawsuit was filed against Sony that year, and now, six years later, Sony has agreed to settle the case.

Ars Technica reports that, under the terms of the settlement--which has not yet been approved--Sony has agreed to pay as much as $55 to as many as 10 million PS3 owners. To get the full $55, gamers need to "attest under oath to their purchase of the product and installation of Linux, provide proof of their purchase or serial number and PlayStation Network Sign-in ID, and submit some proof of their use of the Other OS functionality."

Console owners can also claim $9 in a process that is less involved. To do this, they must send in a claim that explains how, when they bought the system, they "knew about the Other OS, relied upon the Other OS functionality, and intended to use the Other OS functionality."

Alternatively, gamers can get the $9 if they "attest that he or she lost value and/or desired functionality or was otherwise injured as a consequence of Firmware Update 3.21 issued on April 1, 2010."

Only gamers in the US who bought a "fat" PS3 between November 1, 2006 and April 1, 2010 are eligible for the settlement offer. Additionally, there is $2.25 million provided in the settlement in attorneys' fees for the legal counsel that brought the claims against Sony.

A judge will decide in July if the settlement offer will be approved.

According to the agreement, which was filed in court last Friday, Sony will reach out to customers via the PlayStation Network email database. There will also be internet banner ads and search-related ads on sites including GameSpot and sister company CNET, the deal said. You can read the full, 30-page documenthere.

This case dates back to 2010, when a man claimed Sony breached its sales contract, as well as "the covenant of good faith and fair dealing," by removing the Other OS feature from the system. The person who brought the suit, Anthony Ventura, alleged that the removal of the Other OS feature was unlawful due to four main reasons. One of the claimed reasons was that Sony marketed the Other OS functionality, and many owners purchased the system over competing products because of the functionality.

The suit also claimed the Other OS feature was valuable, in that it "saves consumers money from having to…buy many additional electronic devices or applications." It further alleged that Sony reneged on its promise to support the functionality, and it did so by surreptitiously announcing the removal of Other OS only as an update on playstation.com.

The update that removed Other OS wasn't technially required, but not installing it would lock you out of PSN.

We have contacted Sony in an attempt to get more details.
Click to expand...
 
Cool. I get 9 bucks if I fuss around filling out a bunch of forms. Meanwhile, the attorneys walk away with two and a quarter million. Our legal system at work, ladies and gentlemen.
 
How the hell would you provide proof of using a feature when they patched out the OtherOS?

Gimme my cash Soony.
 
"To get the full $55, gamers need to "attest under oath to their purchase of the product and installation of Linux, provide proof of their purchase or serial number and PlayStation Network Sign-in ID, and submit some proof of their use of the Other OS functionality."

lol. I'll pay you $55 not to have to do that.

I always end up with a check for like $1.25 from these class action lawsuits. Woohoo! Payday!
 
Didn't own a PS3. I didn't even know this was a thing. You could install Linux on the PS..... Errm, I mean, Christ sakes, Sony, I wanted to install Linux for years. Gimme my $9!
 
I feel like i owe Sony money for all the great years of gaming they've given me. You'd have to be pretty poor and petty to try and get $50 from them or whatever because wahhh, they took a feature out of the box.

If that were the case for all things in life, then Comcast owes me a hell of a lot of money for my internet service going out randomly for hours on end. Mass lotto owes me money cause i lost on their scratch tickets and it says they're loaded with winners on the ticket.
 
pravus said:
How the hell would you provide proof of using a feature when they patched out the OtherOS?

Gimme my cash Soony.
Click to expand...

That's what I've asked on other forums. The only proof I have of ever using yellow dog Linux is if I take a picture of the DVD I burned and wrote on with a marker.
 
MR X said:
That's what I've asked on other forums. The only proof I have of ever using yellow dog Linux is if I take a picture of the DVD I burned and wrote on with a marker.
Click to expand...

Sounds like it's the court's way of basically acknowledging that people have a case but making it so nobody wins in the end. Who is going to bother with all that nonsense for $55? This is nothing more than people just trying to make Sony look bad.
 
I would...just like I took the $25 for the Vita settlement. They deserve to look bad for removing/disabling features that people paid money for.
 
You must log in or register to reply here.
Top Bottom
Back