It's not a car crash. It's the white Ford Bronco speeding down the highway at eleventeen miles per hour.
i see your coal barron and raise you one NaziJust when you think the GOP can't sink any lower. One of them says hold my beer.
https://splinternews.com/gop-shocked-to-discover-another-hell-monster-may-win-a-1823916741
"
Politico reports today that the Republican Party is aghast and baffled that yet another miserable demon from beneath the world of men may end up winning the party’s nomination in a crucial race.
West Virginia coal baron Don Blankenship—who recently completed a one-year prison sentence for conspiring to violate health and safety standards at Massey Energy’s Upper Big Branch Mine, where 29 of his workers died in unimaginable horror—is running for the GOP nomination for Senate in West Virginia, and f*** me, it looks like he could win it.
"
I'm selling everything. Your posts, your viewing history, and your email addresses!But..... but..... UnionVGF is free ? ? ?
To what extent do NDA's carry in the states? I know internationally, there's a huge amount of wiggle room, and if anything seems shady, the agreement is f***ed.I said it a while back that non-disclosure agreements are not legal for public servants.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...sure-agreements-washington-post-idUSKBN1GU11E
White House officials made to sign non-disclosure agreements: Washington Post
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump ordered senior staff after they joined the White House to sign non-disclosure agreements following several leaks in the early months of his administration, the Washington Post reported on Sunday.
.
And the non-disclosure agreements reportedly stayed in effect even after these officials left the White House. The newspaper wrote that the agreement would restrict the ability for Trump aides to discuss certain information beyond their White House service "at all times thereafter."
To what extent do NDA's carry in the states? I know internationally, there's a huge amount of wiggle room, and if anything seems shady, the agreement is f***ed.
I'm baffled by the amount of people that willingly signed them after reading the details of them in the USA. Some of the clauses in Weinstein's explicitly stated that you couldn't repeat what you saw, but you had to facilitate it.
By the by, Stormy Daniels is handling it like a f***ing champ.
https://mobile.twitter.com/stormydaniels?lang=en
Check out her tweets. She's brutally honest.
I died when Stormy lawyer pulled the picture of Cohen and asked where is he! LOLI said it a while back that non-disclosure agreements are not legal for public servants.
https://www.reuters.com/article/us-...sure-agreements-washington-post-idUSKBN1GU11E
https://www.cnbc.com/2018/03/19/for...ed-white-house-non-disclosure-agreements.htmlWhite House officials made to sign non-disclosure agreements: Washington Post
WASHINGTON (Reuters) - President Donald Trump ordered senior staff after they joined the White House to sign non-disclosure agreements following several leaks in the early months of his administration, the Washington Post reported on Sunday.
The agreements stipulated officials could face monetary penalties if they disclosed confidential White House information to the press or others, and were intended to remain in effect after Trump was no longer president, according to the report.
A draft copy of the agreement would have subjected violators to a $10 million penalty for each instance, payable to the U.S. Treasury, according to Ruth Marcus, the Post’s deputy editorial page editor. Sources familiar with the final document do not remember a similarly large penalty, she said.
Top officials in the Trump campaign signed similar agreements, but legal experts questioned whether such an agreement would be legal for a high-ranking government employee, given constitutional free-speech protections.
Officials ultimately agreed to sign the agreements, in part after concluding they were likely not enforceable, according to the Post.
The White House did not immediately respond to a request for comment.
President Donald Trump had senior administration officials sign agreements muzzling them from discussing confidential information even after leaving the White House, the Washington Post reported Sunday.
Transparency watchdogs and civil liberties groups are criticizing the reported NDAs as unconstitutional.
"Public employees can't be gagged by private agreements," said Ben Wizner, director of the American Civil Liberties Union's Speech, Privacy, and Technology Project, in a statement on Monday.
"These so-called NDAs are unconstitutional and unenforceable."
The Washington post reportedly viewed a draft version of the non-disclosure agreements. The draft would impose crippling $10 million penalties against a signee for each public statement of confidential information uttered, according to the Post. That money would go to the federal government, the Post reported.
"I guess it's like, pick your poison," Wizner said of the various legal problems with the draft agreement in an interview with CNBC. "I don't know which would be more absurd: paying Trump, or paying the U.S. Treasury."
"The fact that the government is listed here makes it even clearer" that the agreement violates the First Amendment, Wizner said.
Non-disclosure agreements in government — even those that extend beyond one's time of service — are not uncommon in certain contexts. Standard Form 312, for instance, is a form of non-disclosure agreement that applies to certain classified information.
But outside of those relatively narrow bounds, Wizner said, "the president has no authority to impose a gag as a requirement of the administration."
The draft reportedly defined "confidential" information as being "all nonpublic information I learn of or gain access to in the course of my official duties in the service of the United States Government on White House staff," including "communications ... with members of the press" and "with employees of federal, state, and local governments."
A person who signed the final version of the agreement told the Post that Trump himself, with support from then-Chief of Staff Reince Priebus and the White House Counsel's Office, had senior White House staff sign the agreements.
And the non-disclosure agreements reportedly stayed in effect even after these officials left the White House. The newspaper wrote that the agreement would restrict the ability for Trump aides to discuss certain information beyond their White House service "at all times thereafter."
I died when Stormy lawyer pulled the picture of Cohen and asked where is he! LOL
That's my understanding too. But the NDA's that follow a settlement are the ones that baffle me.NDAs for government employees is not possible. Any NDA signed is invalid.
NDAs are strong unless it’s used to cover up a crime, endangers the public, or the party that asks for it breaks it.
That tweet is I don’t give a f*** tweet and she knows the NDA is invalid.
McCabe authorized a pergery investigation against Sessions.
Did someone officially offer him a job yet?Well, that's even more reason to be grateful for the Democrats who have offered McCabe a staff job so he can earn the pension they tried to screw him out of for, you know, doing his job.
Mark Pocan of WI did. Not sure what came of that though. I think others have offered as well but not sure who.Did someone officially offer him a job yet?
A cooperating witness in the special counsel investigation worked for more than a year to turn a top Trump fund-raiser into an instrument of influence at the White House for the rulers of Saudi Arabia and the United Arab Emirates, according to interviews and previously undisclosed documents.
Hundreds of pages of correspondence between the two men reveal an active effort to cultivate President Trump on behalf of the two oil-rich Arab monarchies, both close American allies.
High on the agenda of the two men — George Nader, a political adviser to the de facto ruler of the U.A.E., and Elliott Broidy, the deputy finance chairman of the Republican National Committee — was pushing the White House to remove Secretary of State Rex W. Tillerson, backing confrontational approaches to Iran and Qatar and repeatedly pressing the president to meet privately outside the White House with the leader of the U.A.E.
Keep digging Mueller!About half way through listening to last night's Rachel Madow show, and some new information from the New York Times last night regarding George Nader. tldr of the story is that he might have been given immunity and flipped on another guy to show that the White House has been making policy decisions due to foreign money influence from UAE and Saudi Arabia.
https://www.nytimes.com/2018/03/21/...column-region®ion=top-news&WT.nav=top-news