For some reason I see Tulsi highway billboards in SC. Not sure if she has a base there or something.
She is polling at 1% there
For some reason I see Tulsi highway billboards in SC. Not sure if she has a base there or something.
Gabbard isn't hurting anyone by staying in but she's not going to win a thing either.
Warren needs to drop out, she isn't going to take this and but she's just popular enough to do damage to someone who could win. She's not polling any better than 3rd in any of the states coming up and she probably wouldn't win any state other than the one she represents. She's not going to win the more progressive voters because Bernie has that locked up and she's not going to beat the moderates who already have several choices, she has no real lane.
Well she is second in the most recent California poll with only the two of them viable but I have to assume Klob will eat into her support now
I have seen it suggested that it could be better for Bernie if she stays in because if a brokered convention happens she is really the only other person he would really want to see with delegates.
I could buy that especially since whatever support she has lost in the first two states don't really seem to have gone to Bernie.
I have a feeling that a good chunk of her supporters would go to Bernie and a chunk to Klobuchar or Buttigieg. Bernie would get the more policy driven progressives while the other two would get the people who voted based on identity stuff.
The most recent CA polling has her 14 points behind Bernie, yeah she's in 2nd but it's a distant second.
Yeah I get that about a brokered convention but my HOPE is that it doesn't come to that, if that happens I don't see the party coming together enough to beat Trump in November.
It's amazing how, no matter how many concrete plans Warren has, people reduce her campaign to "I'm a woman", and usually *they* are the ones complaining about identity politics.
It's amazing how, no matter how many concrete plans Warren has, people reduce her campaign to "I'm a woman", and usually *they* are the ones complaining about identity politics.
My point about California was if hypothetically they were the only two that were viable they would both get a lot of delegates and that would be a great night for Bernie.
The best case is it quickly gets down to Bernie vs whoever but we know Klob, Pete, Biden, and Bloomberg are going to be there on Super Tuesday. If she makes it harder for them to get viable in some of those states that is a good thing. Even if she drops out I don't think we are going to see him get 35-40% vs this many other candidates. At some point we do have to question how much of his 2016 support was because he wasn't Hillary. Last night just makes you wonder that more.
She should drop out after Nevada to avoid an embarrassing Super Tuesday
Yeah maybe its a funny tweet but Bernie supporters like that continue to do him no favors by being complete tools. She hasn't campaigned well but in terms of policy you can't claim someone has had more concrete plans.
Don't tell me you are falling for that "he lost support" media narrative, there were 9 other people on the ballot last night while in 2016 it was just him vs Hillary so of course he was going to lose support, you can't expect anyone to get a super majority with that many candidates.
It's because every time she speaks she brings up that she's a woman as if we don't have eyes of our own.
And yet, here's the top words used in the last debatr
The one before:
December:
Also;
Debate five
Four
Three
I don't see the first two. I think you are hearing what you don't want to hear and focusing only on that.
Seriously? It doesn't have to be one of her most used words in a debate lol, we all know she's a woman she doesn't need to keep pointing it out, just because it wasn't one of the top words she used in a debate doesn't mean she doesn't bring it up every time she makes a speech or participates in a debate and you know that.
Here are two just off the top of my head, her stupid line about "the women on stage are the only ones who haven't lost" or her lie about she and Klobuchar not taking PAC money even though she has a group doing basically the same thing it's just not called a PAC, she's misleading people just like she is about her plans to pay for healthcare. She has all of these supposed great ideas but she keeps saying she can pay for all of them out of the same pot and it won't work like that and she knows it.
The one that sticks out to me was her campaign saying that Bernie said that a woman couldn't be president. I think everyone felt that was either untrue or simply purposely given out of context to put him the worst light possible.Seriously? It doesn't have to be one of her most used words in a debate lol, we all know she's a woman she doesn't need to keep pointing it out, just because it wasn't one of the top words she used in a debate doesn't mean she doesn't bring it up every time she makes a speech or participates in a debate and you know that.
Here are two just off the top of my head, her stupid line about "the women on stage are the only ones who haven't lost" or her lie about she and Klobuchar not taking PAC money even though she has a group doing basically the same thing it's just not called a PAC, she's misleading people just like she is about her plans to pay for healthcare. She has all of these supposed great ideas but she keeps saying she can pay for all of them out of the same pot and it won't work like that and she knows it.
The one that sticks out to me was her campaign saying that Bernie said that a woman couldn't be president. I think everyone felt that was either untrue or simply purposely given out of context to put him the worst light possible.
Not long after meeting with Sanders at the end of 2018 to discuss her impending presidential run, Warren hosted an off-the-record dinner with a number of journalists, according to sources with knowledge of it. At the dinner, Warren was asked about her meeting with Sanders, and in the course of the discussion, she relayed that Sanders had warned that he didn’t believe a woman could beat Trump in 2020. Different reporters recalled the comments differently, a mirror image of the dispute between Warren and Sanders over exactly what Sanders said — with Warren saying that Sanders argued a woman couldn’t beat Trump, while Sanders said that he only said Trump would weaponize misogyny against a woman, not that it would work.
You're correct that is how it first came out. It's more that she doubled down and definitely didn't go out of her way to clarify with any specific context.I don't think he said it and I assume it was a misunderstanding. Her campaign didn't release that though. She told journalists about it off the record after it happened.
New Details Suggest Warren May Not Have Leaked Sanders Story
New details emerged on Friday night that offered an alternative narrative as to how CNN got tipped off about its highly controversial story claiming 2020 candidate Bernie Sanders warned fellow Democratic rival Elizabeth Warren that a woman can't beat President Donald Trump in this year's...www.mediaite.com
You're correct that is how it first came out. It's more that she doubled down and definitely didn't go out of her way to clarify with any specific context.
Seriously? It doesn't have to be one of her most used words in a debate lol, we all know she's a woman she doesn't need to keep pointing it out, just because it wasn't one of the top words she used in a debate doesn't mean she doesn't bring it up every time she makes a speech or participates in a debate and you know that.
I don't see any problem with saying the women haven't lost. We both know some voters are nervous about whether they would have a harder time because they are women. It doesn't matter if its true or not.
Nobody cares that Bernie can't pay for his plan and won't even pass most of them so complaining about stuff like that is holder her to a higher standard.