If my GPU has to borrow from my slower system ram... I'm having problems
Yea, it's called your game would have crashed.
If my GPU has to borrow from my slower system ram... I'm having problems
In this day and age this console warz bulls*** is played out. People in here acting like children with Val leading the charge.
A great time for all gamers coming soon.
Yup. So they’re both different. How odd.
AMD's RDNA2 Next-Generation Architecture For Radeon Is Not Identical To Xbox Series X Or PS5
Architectural reveals of the next-generation consoles have had enthusiasts discussing AMD's upcoming RDNA2 architecture with much gusto and has started the inevitable speculation on how RDNA2 will translate into next-generation […]wccftech.com
AMD’s RDNA2 Next-Generation Architecture For Radeon Is Not Identical To Xbox Series X Or PS5
Usman Pirzada9 hours ago
Architectural reveals of the next-generation consoles have had enthusiasts discussing AMD's upcoming RDNA2 architecture with much gusto and has started the inevitable speculation on how RDNA2 will translate into next-generation Radeon graphics cards. Unfortunately, or fortunately, a source intimately familiar with the matter tells me that AMD's RDNA2 implementation for its upcoming graphics cards is not comparable to the next generation console's at all.
RDNA2 for AMD Radeon graphics cards not the same as next-gen consoles 'custom RDNA2'
There is a very good reason why both the PS5 and Xbox Series X have listed the architecture used as "custom RDNA2" instead of just "RDNA2". This is a point that AMD wanted to drive home and specifically insisted on. They do not want gamers confusing the RDNA2 used in the XSX and PS5 with that of the upcoming Radeon cards, therefore the "custom" prefix. To be clear, my source did not say how it would be different, but I did feel the implication was that AMD's RDNA2 implementation for Radeon GPUs will be superior.
Here is what I do know:
What I do not know right now:
- AMD's RDNA 2 Next-Generation GPU architecture for Radeon is notthe same as the XSX or the Sony PS5. The semi-custom implementation is a different architecture as the one soon to be featured in the upcoming Radeon GPUs.
AMD's upcoming Big Navi GPUs were originally expected to land by the end of Q2 but it remains to be seen whether the ongoing Coronavirus crisis will have any impact. The company has already revealed however that the upcoming RDNA2 based GPUs will feature support for Direct X 12 Ultimate APU - which should give quite an edge to these graphics cards. DX12 Ultimate, like other DirectX APIs before it requires a certain feature level to be achieved (the last feature level to be released was 12_1 so we are likely looking at hardware that corresponds to 12_2 or above. [/exclusive]
- Difference between the implementation of RDNA 2 in the XSX and PS5.
- Difference between the RDNA2 implementation in next-gen consoles and in upcoming Radeon cards. (While my source did not explicitly state as such, the implication in the conversation was that the Radeon-based RDNA2 will be superior.)
Rumored so far: AMD's Big Navi GPUs spotted in EEC filings
What are thought to be AMD's upcoming Big Navi GPUs have previously been spotted in EEC filings. Keep in mind however that AMD can change the nomenclature and the only thing these filings tell us are the number of variants.
The EEC filing mentions four new GPUs: Radeon RX 5950XT (the flagship), Radeon RX 5950, Radeon RX 5900 and the Radeon RX 5800. This means we can expect at the very least one more Navi GPU with three variants each. It is entirely possible that this is the Big Navi that was promised to us almost 2.5 years ago and the one that will deliver to AMD fans the high-end card they have been waiting for. On the other hand, it is also possible that this is a new die that the company prepared and while these graphics cards will obviously more powerful than the RX 5800 series, it is still not Big Navi.
Without any further ado, here is a screenshot of the EEC filing submitted by AFOX corporation - an add-in board partner for AMD Radeon.
Nomenclature would dictate that the RX 5950 XT be significantly more powerful than any of its younger siblings (like the already-released RX 5700) and going by the steps involved, we can easily see that this is going to be quite a powerful card.
the ramThe Xbox One GPU run faster the PS4 GPU 853 MHz - 800MHz. What advantages did that give the Xbox One?
Ask PS3 how that worked for it.
Sound on.
I think the break down to fp16 and even down to 4 will matter more this gen because there are so many features dedicated to rendering the screen and its components at different levels of detail. All the VRS, RT, and Geometry engine stuff can is processes things at lower precision and save headroom.It reminds me of the FP16 debate and how it would enable the PS4 Pro to double its TF’s.
I know the a Series X has something similar but it’s not going to double its power.
But it is an interesting setup and I’m curious to see the benefits.
I think the break down to fp16 and even down to 4 will matter more this gen because there are so many features dedicated to rendering the screen and its components at different levels of detail. All the VRS, RT, and Geometry engine stuff can is processes things at lower precision and save headroom.
It seems to me that half this new gen is about getting the most out if every process. Its probably why they can so much more out of each "flop". Last gen didn't have these techniques so the lower precision stuff had less impact.
people are becoming celebrities and gaining cult status on internet...but rather downplaying and being negative
i have watched this like a 1,000 times and it is still funny AF!I watched it without sound the first time. NOW watching it a second time with sound is
A 16gb @448gb/s is superior to 10gb @560gb/s setupIt's not the same.
1st PS3 used two DIFFERENT types of RAM, XDR AND DDR3. Not the same situation no matter how many times you tell yourself because the XSX is using the same type of RAM but with a set of faster and slower modules in a single pool.
CPU has access to the slower 6Gs while the GPU has access to the faster 10Gs on a bus that is WIDER than the PS5s.
A 16gb @448gb/s is superior to 10gb @560gb/s setup
My original statement said exactly the same.I mean when I'm presented with facts I usually try to have a counter point to what the original statement was...lol.
You said the PS3 ram situation is the same. I provided proof that it wasn't.
It will be okay Val. You can't be right all the time. The world will go on.
My original statement said exactly the same.
I have spun away from that and said not exactly the same
Both setups run the ram at different speeds which is a bad thing.
Well in my history of gaming Ive never seen more spinning than from the XB camp and these forums are majority XB so I gotta act like the natives(as I should being one anyway)I should change your username to 'Spinmaster.'