Nvidia 4000 series

DLSS3 is turning out crazy performance.



Except there's no way to cap framerates with it, it has to run flat out without vsync or frame cap, and as soon as the framerate skyrockets out of your Gsync Monitors refresh range you will get terrible screen tearing. That's not good IMO.
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Two Pennys Worth
Would it be better to get the nvidia one or a different brand? Are there any major trade offs, pros cons to either one?


Can't go wrong with either. I go 3rd party for the overclocking capabilities. They usually use higher quality components for their best cards for overclocking. Better cooling too. But the nvdia's 4090 has great cooling also and it's better than expected.
 
Last edited:
You might not have a choice.

But if a choice exists... get custom non NVIDIA made one.
I would keep a eye on Aorus and Asus.

This time it seems the AIB cards are a waste:



"Founders Edition Cards waaayyy more competitive and even besting AIB cards"
-Hence why EVGA left.
 
I game at 1440p on the PC, give me a 4070 that will give me 160 fps in every game.
 
This time it seems the AIB cards are a waste:



"Founders Edition Cards waaayyy more competitive and even besting AIB cards"
-Hence why EVGA left.


Not to mention the 4080 12GB marketing mess. They got so much blowback that they "unlaunched" it. LMAO. I hope AMD takes them to task this gen.
 


A Q&A by GN with Nvidia engineers. Very informative. These guys really put in a lot of work into the design. How will 3rd party manufacturers respond?
 
It's faster at resolutions lower than 4K. At 4K the 3090 Ti is still consistently faster.

A 800+ xx70 Ti card is not enticing. The 3070 Ti was faster than 2080 Ti and Titan RTX, for 599.

I have a 1440p 165hz monitor so the larger resolution would not benefit me much. Still don't really see a need to upgrade yet... Deciding whether to go for a 40xx or wait for 50xx series Hmm..