Ars Technica compares Xbox One and PS4 Specs
- Thread starter DriedMangoes
- Start date
I would of kept my PO if they were $100 cheaper and had a exclusive console seller like TF at launch.
360 had better multiplatforms last gen, you never gave them credit, you actually went out your way to downplay it. Now suddenly its all about 3rd party games? oh my how things have changed cutting, but yet very much still the same. I'm predicting another generation of sony cheerleading from you, all the while playing the middle.
Good times.
the funniest post you had this month!
QFT360 had better multiplatforms last gen, you never gave them credit, you actually went out your way to downplay it. Now suddenly its all about 3rd party games? oh my how things have changed cutting, but yet very much still the same. I'm predicting another generation of sony cheerleading from you, all the while playing the middle.
It is. 500$ is well worth the price of admission. It'll pay for itself in the first couple of months if not sooner. Also, think on this; Sony has a temporary win from the gate by not including their camera with the Ps4. Note, I said temporary. But I'd bet the farm that this ends up being a grave mistake on their part simply because the Kinect is much improved and included with the XO. We've already seen this.
Because its included every XO owner has the option to switch and snap apps and content at their leisure and instantly unlike any generation previously. Not to mention what it does with games. That in and of itself is a game changer.
Sony will have to market the hell out of the PSeye in order to get Sony gamers to purchase one, not to mention it will need to able to hold a candle to the Kinect v2. Which we know it can't do. That's going to be an uphill battle mate. What Sony is hoping for is that developers won't utilize the Kinect in any real significant way. But again, it comes with the system, its much more powerful, more accurate; so now its suddenly lucrative and guaranteed.
Yikes! So true.
But Sony did plow through all of those unfortunate events mate. Gotta give it to them.
If by plowing and kicking ass you mean losing almost half of their base from the PS2 then yes, they are plowing and kicking.
I never said most 3rd party games weren't better on the 360? lol what360 had better multiplatforms last gen, you never gave them credit, you actually went out your way to downplay it. Now suddenly its all about 3rd party games? oh my how things have changed cutting, but yet very much still the same. I'm predicting another generation of sony cheerleading from you, all the while playing the middle.
I said that certain PS3 games were unmatched vs the 360.
What changed is this time Sony will have the best looking 1st party and 3rd party games...due to better hardware AND much better dev tools then they had with the PS3.
Most of last gen I was a 360 fanboy....the latter years the PS3 wooed me.
Sorry my cheer-leading IS in the middle...its just XB doesn't get much cheers anymore from me.(this could change)
Its never changed. Who you kiddin' mate?! LOL.
You still bleed green! And you'll bleed green next gen too.
Hmm
Going by just the last 2 gens Sony vs the competition....
PS2 157 million
PS3 80 million
GC 22 Million
Wii 100 million
XB 25 million
XB 360 80 million
Well for what its worth in my history of gaming...I was a longer XB brand fan then PS Brand fan.
PS1 luved
PS2 meh
PS3 luved
XB LUVED
XB 360 luved
Need dat price drop XBO!
360 hit 8o million before the ps3......yeah it's like that!Hmm
Going by just the last 2 gens Sony vs the competition....
PS2 157 million
PS3 80 million
GC 22 Million
Wii 100 million
XB 25 million
XB 360 80 million
Hmm
Going by just the last 2 gens Sony vs the competition....
PS2 157 million
PS3 80 million
GC 22 Million
Wii 100 million
XB 25 million
XB 360 80 million
That isn't how it works. MS more that tripled their base, Nintendo more that quadrupled theirs and Sony lost almost half.
Yes. Yes it did.
Great console. I actually may have abandonment issues when I get my XO
Quit the crap! You want the XO asap like everyone else. You know dis mate. Go on and spend the 500$. You know you wanna....
Okay not what I was saying....but anyway Sony has been the leader as the numbers show.
Again, you have to be pulling our dicks. You have to be. No one is this devoid of brain cells.
Ah. The quick snip.
Let me put it more clearly for you. In your argument you're basically ignoring everything from every other manufacturer. All while giving the nod to Sony about owning up the competition. 8 years. That's how long Sony played in the backseat in total numbers. Now you're right, certain regions the 360 wasn't even worth mentioning. On the same hand, there were quite a few that did a 180 as they were supporting MS far more than Sony. NA and UK wasn't even a race, it was domination for a very long time. So sure, Sony did the damn thing. No where near what the PS2 did (even going off of your numbers), but entirely respectable. But let's not act like it was close for the first 5-6 years.
Yes. MLG. The people that actually play a fps seriously and play the game for what it is. Not counting pixels . What's your gamer tag dude so I can plug it into my cod\battlefueld app to see how much fps experience you have which I'm sure is going to be 0. But you want to post how much better the ps4 controller is then the xbox for fps games.
Lol
I believe the PS3 outsold the 360 almost every year WW since it launched... correct me if I am wrong?