It's barely weaker and it has advantages over the Series X in some ways , the money went to different areas but this thing likely cost right around the same ballpark to make as the Series X.
I don't disagree. That is why they have to cost the same.
It's barely weaker and it has advantages over the Series X in some ways , the money went to different areas but this thing likely cost right around the same ballpark to make as the Series X.
I don't disagree. That is why they have to cost the same.
If Sony prices higher it's because they can't afford the loss but I'm sure we'll see a ton of "arrogant Sony has returned" nonsense, there are already people trying to give MS credit for Sony's pricing if they go $399 digital and $499 standard even though those prices have been predicted and even "leaked" for a while. Bottom line is these are meant to be consumer products and they'll get it out at as low of a price as they can afford to so they can get their adoption rate up as quickly as possible. They aren't going to try to make $50-$100 profit on a console at launch but they also aren't likely going to be willing to lose more than $100 on a box either.
I wouldn't doubt Sony's pricing was going to depend on what MS will be charging. Why else would they wait? MS would have been the same if they went second. It was a game of chicken. I still theorize that the reason Sony still hasn't revealed price is that it may in fact, be more expensive and they need to put some distance from MS's reveal.
Hopefully we know soon, because the wait is ridiculous...
Also need to factor in the extra plastic in the casing, that is larger. The exterior of the PS5 based on the shape, size and amount of plastic needed will add to that cost.I think we can't be sure yet - Sony's got less silicon in the GPU but much higher clocks and having to volt pretty heavily to get there, so the yields may be noticeably different. Plus the SSD controller is custom, rather than an off-the-shelf one which may add some as well. But I also presume they as well as MS went into this with a target price point for their cost even before the sell price target and I don't imagine Sony's would have been set significantly higher.
I still don't see how removing the disk drive will get them 100 dollars cheaper.
I wouldn't doubt Sony's pricing was going to depend on what MS will be charging. Why else would they wait? MS would have been the same if they went second. It was a game of chicken. I still theorize that the reason Sony still hasn't revealed price is that it may in fact, be more expensive and they need to put some distance from MS's reveal.
Hopefully we know soon, because the wait is ridiculous...
I still don't see how removing the disk drive will get them 100 dollars cheaper.
I still don't see how removing the disk drive will get them 100 dollars cheaper.
Sony is expected to announce details such as price and release date at the PS5 related video event to be held on the 17th. Masahiro Wakasugi, an analyst at Bloomberg Intelligence, expects the cheapest case to be priced at $ 449 for a model with a disk drive and $ 399 for a model without a disk drive.
Funny thing is Redtech said yields were going better than expected just a month or so ago.
This means I'll have 3 less consoles to scalp on eBay. Thanks Sony.
you still gonna get my cardboard variant it’s one ps5 right
That guy doesn't know anything.
Just like Zhuge was banned as well but people use him as a source today.That guy doesn't know anything, he got permabanned on neogaf and resetera for spreading BS.
What was the point in that?Just ask for menace-uk- and VaLLiancE opinions and "speculations" and you'll know what not to expect.
Just like Zhuge was banned as well but people use him as a source today.
He has been problematic at Gaf.Well he isn't banned at resetera. He does seem to be banned on GAF but it isn't related to his info being reliable or not.
He has been problematic at Gaf.
Eurogamer: Sony's PSN made more money than all of Nintendo last fiscal year
The bee is Nintendo!www.neogaf.com
And he also mentioned that MS was no longer investing in Xbox as a fact, but 8 months later MS had grown to 15 Xbox studios, which he was called out for being unreliable. He is notorious for being anti-xbox as well for quite awhile.
Ok we will have to agree to disagree.Like I said he wasn't banned for his info so that doesn't really matter that he is. Nothing really wrong with any of those posts anyway.
He has got a lot right and has credibility which doesn't mean he is never wrong. Some of these supposed insiders never get anything right.