Commenting on movie posters is a lot like commenting on the logo of your particular toothpaste. Who gives a s***?!
Imagine your toothpaste logo with a giant penius on it, extreme example, but you start to wonder about the people behind it when they let stuff like that out.
There isn't a penis on the movie poster in question. It's two well known and talented actors dressed in character trying to look cool. The person behind this movie (Ridley Scott) is, safe to say, a known quantity at this point. I don't think we have to worry too much about our yearly Ridley Scott movie. It's going to be a Ridley Scott movie.
You didn't get my post. I don't care if the cover was an actual photo taken of God himself, you can still fvck it up. Ridley Scott, or those actors didn't design this, they act and direct, not design posters. The movie could be awesome, thats not my point at all though. Its just odd the art directors would allow that to be seen, makes me wonder about other things.
Just a movie poster, dude.
Right, so maybe I or yourself can design it then since its just a poster? Millions of people see it for the first impression of the film, its important. Imagery is incredibly powerful.
Yes it is practically 2 different movies. The theatrical version is a mess and you have no idea why some of the characters are doing what they are doing. All fixed on the DC on DVD/BD.Kingdom Of Heaven DC was sooooo much better than when I saw it in theaters.
How did its going? Was it good? I'm curious about that. I will see it someday.Going to see this tonight.
How did its going? Was it good? I'm curious about that. I will see it someday.