Saw another tweet saying Sony sold more PS4's in 2018 than Nintendo did Switch by about 300k.
I saw one that said the Switch was the number one selling console in 18..
Cool but 10 cents still dwarf Sony & all other game companies, & gaming isn't even their core business.So PSN alone brought in more money for Sony than all of Nintendo made last year and all of MS's gaming division revenue brought in for MS, that's just PSN that's not including hardware and physical game sales, that's crazy.
Is that good or bad?Kingdom Hearts III did 610,077 in Japan in its first week not including digital
Is that good or bad?
Rootin' Shootin' Cootin' Tootin'
I dunno. I hear the 41 million number of Xbox One's sold is false and that we should hear about what they really sold at E3. That's just rumor right now so take it with a grain of salt.Switch is on pace to surpass the Xbo,possibly in less than a year.
I dunno. I hear the 41 million number of Xbox One's sold is false and that we should hear about what they really sold at E3. That's just rumor right now so take it with a grain of salt.
The real name for Red Dead Redemption 2
Monster Hunter has shipped over 10M
http://www.capcom.co.jp/ir/english/news/html/e190204b.html?_pb_uid=1776
If it was only 41 by now, that means it sold 900k in the past year.I dunno. I hear the 41 million number of Xbox One's sold is false and that we should hear about what they really sold at E3. That's just rumor right now so take it with a grain of salt.
No it sold 6.5 million..If it was only 41 by now, that means it sold 900k in the past year.
No idea WHAT you are talking about. But I am laughing.No it sold 6.5 million..
Go in the thread with your false links and I'll watch you get laughed out of it.
I disagree. I think it could be more - thats just me.Probably false, I doubt they (or anyone in their position) would announce what they've actually sold, when you are really far behind you generally focus on numbers that you can sort of fudge to paint your product in the best possible light. If they aren't telling investors exactly how many they aren't going to announce it at a trade show. Even if it's not 41 it's not likely much more.
I don't think they will announce the number either. First, they already said they don't anymore. Secondly, why announce a number that is nearly half as much as the competitor?If they are going to announce their numbers they would just do it. No point in saving it for some big stage like the number is going to blow anyone away.
Thats all fine and dandy for this gen but next gen, hardware sold will fade to the back and software and services will take the lead. Hardware will still matter of course, but I dont think it'll be the be-all-end-all it typically has been.Probably false, I doubt they (or anyone in their position) would announce what they've actually sold, when you are really far behind you generally focus on numbers that you can sort of fudge to paint your product in the best possible light. If they aren't telling investors exactly how many they aren't going to announce it at a trade show. Even if it's not 41 it's not likely much more.
Thats all fine and dandy for this gen but next gen, hardware sold will fade to the back and software and services will take the lead. Hardware will still matter of course, but I dont think it'll be the be-all-end-all it typically has been.
It really isnt now, now that I think about it.
Thats all fine and dandy for this gen but next gen, hardware sold will fade to the back and software and services will take the lead. Hardware will still matter of course, but I dont think it'll be the be-all-end-all it typically has been.
It really isnt now, now that I think about it.