:/
It’s a bloody TV show, they are against it in all areas, time, money, staff etc, Trust me I know 
I think people are hating on her CG look, cos she is so smooth. Thanos has skin imperfections etc so gives it a more detailed, textured, weathered look. She is clean and smooth so people think it’s not as good, as not as many bells and whistles.
I think people are hating on her CG look, cos she is so smooth. Thanos has skin imperfections etc so gives it a more detailed, textured, weathered look. She is clean and smooth so people think it’s not as good, as not as many bells and whistles.
She just looks bad. Plain and simple.It’s a bloody TV show, they are against it in all areas, time, money, staff etc, Trust me I know
I think people are hating on her CG look, cos she is so smooth. Thanos has skin imperfections etc so gives it a more detailed, textured, weathered look. She is clean and smooth so people think it’s not as good, as not as many bells and whistles.
It’s a bloody TV show, they are against it in all areas, time, money, staff etc, Trust me I know
I think people are hating on her CG look, cos she is so smooth. Thanos has skin imperfections etc so gives it a more detailed, textured, weathered look. She is clean and smooth so people think it’s not as good, as not as many bells and whistles.
Referencing Thanos is interesting because he was changed over time since the first Avengers cameo or even GotG. I'm not even thinking of the quality of the modeling or the texture mapping, but simply the color saturation toned down. I think the look in GotG got a pass because Space is a very unnatural lighting environment. GotG Thanos didn't really Emote that much either so the expression Mocap wasn't really noticeable good or bad.
I think there is a Luminosity problem or they're unsure how to apply the fake 3D lighting. They're just making it match the non-CGI people around her, but deep green shouldn't light up the same way and I think it's come off a weird effect.
For example, Gamora is not as bright as Mantis. Now imagine if for some reason in Post, the Luminosity was bumped up to match for some reason. It wouldn't be bad 'CGI', but something would look weirdly Photoshopped.
I think the CGI model is basically fine, the Mocap for speech could be a touch better, something with the lighting is off. For a TV show I don't think it's terrible and maybe this is an early preview. Also, for what it's worth, Bruce Banner was a supporting character just appearing throughout the movies, while this will be the star of a show with much more screen time, so this is more demanding on the FX crew to sort out.
EDIT: It also looks like in this thumbnail Smart Hulk / Banner is toned down if not quite as much as Thanos, but they chose to have She-Hulk be more green.
EDIT EDIT: Ang Lee's 2003 HULK was also very Green and I think had some mixed results on the lighting. Newer Smart Hulk is not like this. You'd think would be sorted out by now, but maybe the creators of She-Hulk ( or marketing people ) were enthusiastic about emphasizing the green color not quite getting how tricky is was to make it look good.
Last edited:
I understand, I’m ok with it. But I think it’s just that one scane people point out that the reaction just doesn’t seem to move logically/normal?It’s a bloody TV show, they are against it in all areas, time, money, staff etc, Trust me I know
I think people are hating on her CG look, cos she is so smooth. Thanos has skin imperfections etc so gives it a more detailed, textured, weathered look. She is clean and smooth so people think it’s not as good, as not as many bells and whistles.
To me it’s just the hair, but long hair has always been a challenge, the folk doing avatar just seem to braid it or have it super short.
But if you compare it to Jane in Thor Love and thunder, she’s either got a body double with lots of makeup on her arms or them arms be CG. Like when you compare Hers to Valkries arm, Valkyrie has like very fine gradual gradations and or like freckles and her arms.
With Thor the lighting kinda washes it out, hiding it, I guess.
But it may also be the lighting in said scene people are complaining about.
I don’t care, I’m watching this, hope it’s fun/funny.
The hair is what clearly f***s everything up, but even skin textures etc looks bad.... I guess it's the budget? Avengers and star wars (they did a true-to-life CGI Leia ffs) look looks mostly amazing but at the same time most likely cost a lot more?
It is funny, once you post pics everything you said is forgotten because she looks so bad relative to everything else.Referencing Thanos is interesting because he was changed over time since the first Avengers cameo or even GotG. I'm not even thinking of the quality of the modeling or the texture mapping, but simply the color saturation toned down. I think the look in GotG got a pass because Space is a very unnatural lighting environment. GotG Thanos didn't really Emote that much either so the expression Mocap wasn't really noticeable good or bad.
I think there is a Luminosity problem or they're unsure how to apply the fake 3D lighting. They're just making it match the non-CGI people around her, but deep green shouldn't light up the same way and I think it's come off a weird effect.
For example, Gamora is not as bright as Mantis. Now imagine if for some reason in Post, the Luminosity was bumped up to match for some reason. It wouldn't be bad 'CGI', but something would look weirdly Photoshopped.
I think the CGI model is basically fine, the Mocap for speech could be a touch better, something with the lighting is off. For a TV show I don't think it's terrible and maybe this is an early preview. Also, for what it's worth, Bruce Banner was a supporting character just appearing throughout the movies, while this will be the star of a show with much more screen time, so this is more demanding on the FX crew to sort out.
View attachment 7846
View attachment 7847
EDIT: It also looks like in this thumbnail Smart Hulk / Banner is toned down if not quite as much as Thanos, but they chose to have She-Hulk be more green.
View attachment 7849
EDIT EDIT: Ang Lee's 2003 HULK was also very Green and I think had some mixed results on the lighting. Newer Smart Hulk is not like this. You'd think would be sorted out by now, but maybe the creators of She-Hulk ( or marketing people ) were enthusiastic about emphasizing the green color not quite getting how tricky is was to make it look good.
View attachment 7850View attachment 7851
I'll still watch it, and hopefully it improves before it airs.
The mandalorian had a similar issue with Luke in season 2.
And then there was gran admiral Tarkin in Rogue One
I thought it looked great in Rogue One lol
In the right lighting yeah but now and then it went a bit funny and struggled with any movement slightly faster than a snails.
She-Hulk Show Reveals New Look at Main Villain (Photo)
New photos provide the best look yet at Jameela Jamil's Titania from She-Hulk.
thedirect.com
'She-Hulk: Attorney at Law’ Finds Its Composer in Amie Doherty
The series drops on August 17 on Disney+
collider.com
She-Hulk and Black Panther: Wakanda Forever Will Conclude Phase 4 of the MCU, Phase 5 Revealed - San Diego Comic Con - IGN
Marvel Studios head Kevin Feige has not only confirmed that She-Hulk and Black Panther will conclude Phase 4 of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, but he also helped reveal the films and shows that will be part of Phase 5.
I think it looks fine, but weird mix on the humor.
Otherwise, is there room to develop Bruce Banner as a character more or what? Or the real reasons why he had the Angry Hulk problem so long and She-Hulk never has this issue? Maybe explain the whole Prof. Hulk thing? Is that really all resolved now?
Would be nice to see him more outside the Avengers stuff and probably show up in Thunderbolts?
Otherwise, is there room to develop Bruce Banner as a character more or what? Or the real reasons why he had the Angry Hulk problem so long and She-Hulk never has this issue? Maybe explain the whole Prof. Hulk thing? Is that really all resolved now?
Would be nice to see him more outside the Avengers stuff and probably show up in Thunderbolts?
Last edited:
Should they have gone a different route, something along the lines of law and order svu (super villains unit)?
The "She-Hulk" Creators Discussed The Show's Questionable CGI, And They Made A Good Point
“I know there’s lots of eyes on the CG and critique."
www.buzzfeed.com