The End of the World: A Political Thread. A New Hope coming soon!

Status
Not open for further replies.
Hold f***ing s***. Read the tweet and then watch the video at 28 if it doesn’t jump to that mark.



Yikes. The signs are all there that a decline is happening fast now. And a list of symptoms he's shown, its just too many to be just aging and narcissism.


EDZoGyzUwAAXC9U.jpg:large
 
  • Informative
Reactions: Plainview
Screw Joe Manchin but Democrats need him at the same time. Wish there was a way to toss him.
 
Screw Joe Manchin but Democrats need him at the same time. Wish there was a way to toss him.
If he doesn't try to keep his senate seat, there's no doubt going to be a republican elected. He is sketchy at best, but he also is protecting the backasswards state known as West Virginia, from electing someone truly despicable. He most definitely votes to keep his seat in the senate.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viktor
I'll tell you what wouldn't help with transparency and that is changing the rules at the last minute to help certain candidates.

Telling people why some polls are accepted and some aren't isn't changing the rules.
 
Telling people why some polls are accepted and some aren't isn't changing the rules.

It is when its too late to do something about it. The polls that were picked also weren't done so to specifically keep her out but she is totally fine with letting people think that is what happened

So much for transparency

And she absolutely wants them to change the rules even though its too late to do so in a fair or transparent way

We both know what she is doing
 
Last edited:
It is when its too late to do something about it. The polls that were picked also weren't done so to specifically keep her out but she is totally fine with letting people think that is what happened

So much for transparency

And she absolutely wants them to change the rules even though its too late to do so in a fair or transparent way

We both know what she is doing

All they have to do is say why they go with the polls they do and why they won't accept others that are considered more reliable, do that and she'll have nothing to complain about. No rule gets changed and it takes her argument away from her.
 
All they have to do is say why they go with the polls they do and why they won't accept others that are considered more reliable, do that and she'll have nothing to complain about. No rule gets changed and it takes her argument away from her.

Of course, and yet we know that having nothing to complain about equates to zero complaints about as frequently as anal causes pregnancy. The reason for the specific polls is just something to complain about when you can't qualify - if she made it in four of the listed ones with no other ones close she wouldn't give a fleck of crap.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: yankeessuck
All they have to do is say why they go with the polls they do and why they won't accept others that are considered more reliable, do that and she'll have nothing to complain about. No rule gets changed and it takes her argument away from her.

She already has nothing to complain about. Its about sowing discord not making real complaints and we both know it. The only legitimate time to complain would be when they picked the polls. Why didn't she ask for transparency at the time where something can actually get done about it?

If you can only get 2% in 2 of 21 polls you don't have 2%
 
She already has nothing to complain about. Its about sowing discord not making real complaints and we both know it. The only legitimate time to complain would be when they picked the polls. Why didn't she ask for transparency at the time where something can actually get done about it?

If you can only get 2% in 2 of 21 polls you don't have 2%

She has 2 and above in plenty of polls, she's averaging higher than Klobuchar who just happened to qualify in 4 of the polls that they accept. She's not going to be the nominee but the amount of crap that gets spread about her and the fact that the DNC is already not happy with her for rocking the boat last time is enough for me to at least question how she's being treated. I know the polls aren't specific to her, they all have to qualify for the same ones, I would like to know what heir decision making process was on which polls they feel are acceptable vs the ones that aren't though.
 
She has 2 and above in plenty of polls, she's averaging higher than Klobuchar who just happened to qualify in 4 of the polls that they accept. She's not going to be the nominee but the amount of crap that gets spread about her and the fact that the DNC is already not happy with her for rocking the boat last time is enough for me to at least question how she's being treated. I know the polls aren't specific to her, they all have to qualify for the same ones, I would like to know what heir decision making process was on which polls they feel are acceptable vs the ones that aren't though.

Klobuchar got lucky and that is a good argument for more polls with more requirements but that isn't really the issue. She is either spreading the conspiracy theory directly or just allowing herself to be used for it to be spread.

The reality is them using a small number of polls is fine and really doesn't need to be explained as long as they chose them and announced them well ahead of time.

And I don't think any candidate should go on Tucker Carlson but they certainly shouldn't go on if he is using them for his agenda of helping Trump. This is why she can't be trusted. This is the type of thing that forced her to come out and say she wouldn't run as an independent. That isn't people spreading anything about her that is her acting is such a sketchy way that people don't trust her.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Plainview
I would like to know what heir decision making process was on which polls they feel are acceptable vs the ones that aren't though.
No, you don't. You only care that they're not picking the polls that would let her qualify; if you had any legitimate interest in methodology you would have asked when the polls were designated. When the standard is clear as day and announced in advance and then the candidate tries to meet it (and does for two debates) but suddenly has qualms when she doesn't meet it for the next debate, that's simply whining. That they don't change the rules for her is evidence that it's rigged? Gtfo.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Plainview
It is so sad that people fall for this. I love how he says the world economy may be in trouble, but pretends that the US would be immune to this.
These people aren't middle and lower class in their minds. They're rich, but democrats are holding them back.
 
  • Agree
Reactions: Kerosene31
These people aren't middle and lower class in their minds. They're rich, but democrats are holding them back.

Yep, the kind of people with a 2nd mortgage on the house and an 8 year car loan on a pickup truck who still believe in trickle down economics.
 
No, you don't. You only care that they're not picking the polls that would let her qualify; if you had any legitimate interest in methodology you would have asked when the polls were designated. When the standard is clear as day and announced in advance and then the candidate tries to meet it (and does for two debates) but suddenly has qualms when she doesn't meet it for the next debate, that's simply whining. That they don't change the rules for her is evidence that it's rigged? Gtfo.

Didn't say it was rigged but knowing the methodology would be nice, especially when some polls that are more accurate than the ones being used for consideration are being left out.
 
Long night of TV with these climate change town halls. I got home when Harris was on. She’s just a poor candidate. Her speaking skills are terrible. She’s a terrible presenter. She’s just bad.

Klobuchar has a lot of stances I agree with. We can’t go kamikaze on everything. It will take steps. She’ll never get the nomination because she lacks the “it,” factor IMO.

Neither one of their seats are up for grabs, so them staying in is of little consequence.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JinCA
Status
Not open for further replies.