I don't count death threats between rabid fanboys. But I guess that's not fair to you, so I'll let it slide. You need to fill that catalog, after all.
Was I supposed to send you a death threat? I was in the middle of writing one up for Val.I don't know who that is but I also didn't know that death threats didn't count anymore. I blame Hedon for not sending me the memo.
Death counts only count when you say so? That says it all. You are too biased towards Xbox to look at this honestly.
Just so we’re clear, death threats are not okay. They should be taken seriously. A person’s or persons’ overall gross behavior does not excuse or reduce the harm induced by such threats. Neither does making distinctions based on who such threats are made against.
The Frank O'Conner one was a good example of what I meant when we were talking about which is worse.
I wonder why I'd count that and not a death threat among rabid fanboys dedicating their twitter and YT to fanboying.
I mean, a death threat against a developer or voice actress or gamer is the same as against a rabid fanboy who dedicates all his time to antagonize others, right?
But my reasoning is crazy. I am too Xbox biased.
Well, before we get too crazy, they have consistently carried one of the highest payrolls year after year to buy talent for their winning teams.
Yup
No player signs with a team in a high tax state without the huge over pay. Spending money is a requirement to compete for most teams.
Doesn't matter what the pay role is. Fact is the Yankees are the Greatest Baseball franchise in American Baseball history.
Packers? Really?Yup
No player signs with a team in a high tax state without the huge over pay. Spending money is a requirement to compete for most teams.
Doesn't matter what the pay role is. Fact is the Yankees are the Greatest Baseball franchise in American Baseball history.
For example the Red Sox are also a great organization that carries a high pay role. Nothing wrong with paying players.
Other Great Sports Franchises are the Lakers, Celtics, Steelers, Giants, Patriots, Packers, 49ers etc.
f00k those teams(except the lakers and celtics)Yup
No player signs with a team in a high tax state without the huge over pay. Spending money is a requirement to compete for most teams.
Doesn't matter what the pay role is. Fact is the Yankees are the Greatest Baseball franchise in American Baseball history.
For example the Red Sox are also a great organization that carries a high pay role. Nothing wrong with paying players.
Other Great Sports Franchises are the Lakers, Celtics, Steelers, Giants, Patriots, Packers, 49ers etc.
Packers? Really?
I would certainly hope so. If you’re going to pay to win, then it would be best to win.
In all seriousness though, the payroll does matter. One of the core reasons that led to the strike was the grievances over how much power owners had to build teams through high salaries as compared to the small market teams. There was a distinct disadvantage issue. Ultimately, it led to the luxury tax imposed on teams for exceeding the salary threshold. If it didn’t matter, the threshold would not have been set and subsequent tax for going over it. Regardless, it doesn’t really make much a difference. The large market teams continue to pay to win, often spending more money on one or two players than other teams’ entire roster.
They are clearly not affected too much by it. They probably make enough money through merchandising to offset any sting they would feel from the tax. Especially considering those markets have so many bandwagon fans.
f00k those teams(except the lakers and celtics)
I have nothing good to say about the Packers.Historically the Packers are a Great Franchise.
Considering the bolded, that's exactly my point, just because you spend a lot of money doesn't mean you're winning all the time.
There is a lot more to it as proven by teams that spend and lose and teams that barely spend such as the Florida Marlins that have already won 2 world series chips.
I would be OK with a Hard Cap in Baseball if it excludes the tax rate.
So Players would still bring home the same amount of money at the end of the day.
Set a hard cap that doesn't include the amount of taxes being paid out. This way it would truly be an even playing field.
Hopefully Xbox does well enough to stay in business but outside of that, "winning" doesn't f***ing matter. Last time they won, they began to suck.