Why? If it was 60fps I'd be pissed cause I already own the Pro version...
It looked almost identical with fake to real going by playing it on pro(fake 4k) and pc(4k)
Don't mention me like this anymore man or I'm blocking you.
The Xbox Onesie
- Thread starter TAVIS206
- Start date
Why? If it was 60fps I'd be pissed cause I already own the Pro version...
It looked almost identical with fake to real going by playing it on pro(fake 4k) and pc(4k)
Don't mention me like this anymore man or I'm blocking you.
I think playground just started working on that second IP. With their working relationship I'm sure Microsoft would have gotten first dibs to publish it.
Its really not. By that logic it would be better if Destiny launched later on Xbox.
Knowing MS, they passed on it "because we feel it didn't offer anything new to our portfolio at the time", only to have it turn out an excellent franchise.
If those are the specific and only games you care about, I see how you'd feel that way, but there's a laundry list of things MICROSOFT has destroyed Sony on this generation, and that laundry list FARRRR outweighs that one shortcoming in my opinion.
When you take all of the ID@Xbox games, the first and third party X1 games, the list of backwards compat games - Xbox One owners have a longer list of titles to choose from than Sony owners.
I know that was true at one point, and I think it's still true.
Depends. Playground are indeppendant and I would imagine they would want to broaden there consumer base at some point.
Well something is going wrong then cause so far Sony is bending Microsoft over the table and ramming it hard.
Now don't get me wrong... I love my Xbox and will be getting Xbox xoxoxox day 1.
It's different with Indies. Most Indies can only afford to get their game out on one platform at a time so whoever gives them the most help/push/marketing/development money will get the game first. That's not a bad thing. With AAA games, any exclusive is a result of Microsoft or Sony paying them to withhold content.
I find the two situations completely different. In one situation, you're helping smaller developers grow which is good for the industry. Money hating AAA developers is wasted resources. You're paying them to not make something. That's destructive...unless it's a Tomb Raider or Street Fighter situation where the publisher may not have developed the game otherwise. Even in those situations I'm skeptical of the reasoning.
I know Microsoft did that a lot last gen and I found it crappy and bad for the industry then as I do now.
MS tracks success by number of monthly active Live users and its annual growth. Last I read, that was 55 million users, up 17% I believe from the previous year's same period.
Their engine doesn't help you are right but again the vast majority of games will have target 30fps on X1X if they do on One S, the bump from a 1.75 to a 2.3Ghz isn't enough to double a framerate when in most games the framerate is tied to CPU. What will happen is games that struggle to hold a solid 30 on the base console will be a solid 30 on the One X.
But that wasn't what he was on about.
55 million. That means there are far more 360 gamers than X1 gamers.
Like a month or two ago Phil tweeted when asked that console sales were up. He didn't say by how much.
Correct. Just said better than before. You could probably beg, plead and hold a gun to his head, and he won't release numbers.