IGN giving multiplayer 4/10
Ouch lol
Unsurprising, it's really just a tech demo that they HAD to get in there some how.
IGN giving multiplayer 4/10
Ouch lol
Honestly, I really think there was a ton more they could/should have done. I'm saying that what they did do is still a step up and quite enjoyable.Not saying it is a carbon copy. But you really think that is enough after a decade?
It does! I just wish the launch pad didn’t take up the same space as the grenades.
For me, co-op is where it’s at. Playing through it with the same buddy I played through CD1 with.
This game is really like an homage to CD. As stated here already, there is so much they could do with this title! I hope they give it to a new studio and we get a full-on, proper 4 one of these days.
Agree, you may have opinions on it whether you like it or not though.Basically if you're a fan of the first Crackdown, you will enjoy this game. If you're not a fan of the first Crackdown or never played it, you most likely will not like this game.
hope his family doesn't check metacritic.
It's nice that they were able to do that.
Agree, you may have opinions on it whether you like it or not though.
Take rdr2, in my top 5 games ever made, I still think the main story missions (until the last two chapters) are handled poorly gameplay wise and that they are way too restricted, still, it's 10/10 for me. So me criticizing crackdown for its many shortcomings (which are all mostly correct and not just opinions) isn't me saying I don't like the game.
Still, the 1-10 scale are mostly used as a 1-5 scale where a 5 basically is a 0-1 and a 6 a 1-2, which would be fairly poor to mediocre. An average games score today (looking at gaming media reviews) would be 7-7.5. It's a strange evolution but I'm guessing this happened when reviewers didn't have time to play all games anymore because of the flood of games that's been coming the last two decades. They mostly only review good games or hyped games (which aren't always good).I like it but it's really just a slightly above average game overall, it's fun but very shallow. It does some things really well, they've fixed some things that were problems with the original game like the melee combat and handling but in some other areas they haven't advanced it much at all. Either way I'm having fun with it, I'd recommend it to people who liked the first game for sure. People who are getting offended by 6's need to realize that's not really a bad score, it's just above average. Yeah we all wish every game was a 9 or a 10 but that's just not reality, on a 1-10 scale 5 is average and this is just slightly above that so a 6 is fair and also still worth giving a shot IMO.
Still, the 1-10 scale are mostly used as a 1-5 scale where a 5 basically is a 0-1 and a 6 a 1-2, which would be fairly poor to mediocre. An average games score today (looking at gaming media reviews) would be 7-7.5. It's a strange evolution but I'm guessing this happened when reviewers didn't have time to play all games anymore because of the flood of games that's been coming the last two decades. They mostly only review good games or hyped games (which aren't always good).
Sure, I've had numerous poorly reviewed games giving me lots of fun (too human, that 50 cent game, AC Unity and more).Oh yeah I know some people think anything below a 7.5 is terrible but I think we can all find a game we've enjoyed in the past that scored poorly in reviews. I liked Blood wake but that is generally regarded as a bad game lol. I think anything from a 6.5 to a 7.5 is totally fair here, anything beyond that would seem a bit much to me, that being said this is my 2nd favorite X1 exclusive (Ori is first) that I've played on my One X. It's not the best looking but I'm having more fun with it than I did Halo 5 or Gears 4.
Basically if you're a fan of the first Crackdown, you will enjoy this game. If you're not a fan of the first Crackdown or never played it, you most likely will not like this game.
The game is at least an 8 in my book. Sumo killed this s***. Great job!
I don't see where it is 8.The game is at least an 8 in my book. Sumo killed this s***. Great job!
I don't see where it is 8.
The story is basic at best.
The combat is detached and not very satisfying.
The leveling up hasn't really given anything great, i am level 4 on everything but driving.
The boss fights have been a joke thus far.
The mission structure and overall gameplay loop is extremely repetitive and grows boring rather quckly.
The 2 good things that stand out for me are: Weapon diversity and Propaganda towers.
Dont what to tell you. I never care about stories in video games but this one has more story than the first. It is basic though, yep.I don't see where it is 8.
The story is basic at best.
The combat is detached and not very satisfying.
The leveling up hasn't really given anything great, i am level 4 on everything but driving.
The boss fights have been a joke thus far.
The mission structure and overall gameplay loop is extremely repetitive and grows boring rather quckly.
The 2 good things that stand out for me are: Weapon diversity and Propaganda towers.
That last sentence is utter bulls***, and a lame way to try and dismiss my opinion.Dont what to tell you. I never care about stories in video games but this one has more story than the first. It is basic though, yep.
I like the combat. That's the best part aside from leaping from buildings in search of orbs. What do you mean detached?
Boss fights are pretty epic after the second boss (to me)
Gameplay loop has always been the same. Though this is a bit better than first or second Crackdown together.
But, I mean, your Menace. You're like, part Ukrain or Russian. Always gloomy on everything. I can dig it. You arent feeling the game. I just disagree
.... I thought the "uk" was because him being british, you mean he's Ukrainian...? Interesting.But, I mean, your Menace. You're like, part Ukrain or Russian. Always gloomy on everything. disagree
I dont know what that boi is. I know he can find the darkness and negative in a piece of Wonder bread though. Menace don't play....... I thought the "uk" was because him being british, you mean he's Ukrainian...? Interesting.
Lol..... I thought the "uk" was because him being british, you mean he's Ukrainian...? Interesting.
That last sentence is utter bulls***, and a lame way to try and dismiss my opinion.
Detached, I mean it is just something you do...it doesn't have any kind of feedback at all. There is no excitement to it, no satisfaction. Same thing for the bosses really.
As you progress the enemies do get tougher and smarter. Thats for sure!All the criticism are correct, it is just a matter of how you feel about them!
Poor story: True, but it's an arcade game and it's refreshing to just be able to play a simple game without tons of exposition.
Most of the problems it is that it is an arcade game, not an epic game. If you enjoy arcade games it's worth a download on gamepass.
The one issue that really holds this game back is the AI: It's fun to rain destruction, but some basic enemy dodges and movement would really improve the game. Even the teleporting enemies are easy since you gan just blow them up before they phase.