Bloodborne to be 30fps by choice.

Higher resolution not needed, higher frame rate not needed, higher textures not needed. AKA these consoles are weak as hell so instead of pushing them we will settle for barely doing better than last gen consoles. At this point lets just go back to 8-bit graphics.
 
  • Like
Reactions: de3d1
I will post some pics when I get home.
5ED4FB867F8CC872D3DBEA43646EEF1122A289FD


691BD96D93EDA5F8DB2CB6F8764D3C3134DE29F5


Very comparable imo and it runs @ 60+ fps.
 
that top pic is just ugly Val, it looks like next gen crossed with a ps2 game.
 
http://www.playstationlifestyle.net...ts-the-best-for-action-games-claims-producer/

Bloodborne Frame Rate Targeting 30fps Since It’s “the Best” for Action Games, Claims Producer
October 27, 2014 Written by Alex Co



While we already reported that Bloodborne is targeted to run at “only” 30 frames-per-second (fps), it seems we now know why.

In an interview at the GameStart gaming convention last week withBloodborne Producer Masaaki Yamagiwa, we asked him what the target resolution and frame-rate was for the upcoming action-RPG. Yamagiwa noted that while they “haven’t made an official announcement yet but they will probably go for 30fps since that’s what they found to be the best fps (frames-per-second) to play action games.”

Yamagiwa added that “from the beginning, they weren’t targeting 60fps because it’s not first-person shooting, it’s an action game.”

like I said in the AC:U thread, fps and res are small potatoes. with the extra horse power, it only makes sense to blow the extra resources on game play mechanics - the very same thing Sony did last gen for the PS3. this allowed the worlds to become larger, more interactive, and alive. this is where you could clearly see where competitors had trouble keeping up and where you would also witness the true muscle from the platform.

now, if res and fps is all that deems a platform next gen, then we might as well have a PS2 type experience in 4k at 120 fps. its a lot of wasted resources if you ask me, which adds nothing new to the next gen experience regarding game play.
 
How high are you right now?



That looks awful. Get your eyes checked.

Why aren't you playing in 4k?
No, they don't look terrible. And I'd even say the second one looks really fantastic.
 
Those pics were bait to expose people.

3k downsampled to 1080p with 4 x smaa.

But I need my eyes checked? Lol

Well I said 4k. It doesn't look super sharp, so that's why I asked. I know you're rocking a Titan, so I figured that would get it there with no problems.

Still looks bad. The geometry on everything gives it a dated look. From the janky looking rope, everything super low poly, the meh textures and the old last gen light reflection in the first pic (where it looks like glow in the dark Vaseline rubbed onto the wood).. etc etc.

Didn't look good. Just my opinion, which isn't worth much, but I don't think I'd ever mistake that for a next gen on any day. And it certainly doesn't look comparable to Bloodborne.
 
Those pics were bait to expose people.

3k downsampled to 1080p with 4 x smaa.

But I need my eyes checked? Lol

Bait for what ? Sorry fella but it would take a lot of Mods to make DS2 look visually impressive, and that is coming from a huge DS fan. From what we have seen of Bloodbourne, Bloodbourne >> DS2 downsampled from 3k & 4xsmaa. There is only so much a bit of AA and downsampling can do and that is tied directly to the quality of assets from the start.
 
Its downsampled not upscaled.

You know exactly what I meant. Ugly game is ugly. I know you have a DS boner, and that is fine, its a good game. But a graphically impressive game it is not.

The environments alone in BB are substantially more detailed than DS2. All the resolution in the world wont change that.
 
Vaseline eh? Lol
You prob think Ryse is the best looking game right?

That's about as accurate of a comparison I can make.

3IpkV3O.jpg


Look at that thick sheen of a lighting effect. I was going to say it reminded of the low quality effect that they use in Morrowind for when you enchant armor/weapons.. but that would be a little bit TOO spot on.
 
Cool. So your idea of graphic quality is that everything can be ugly as hell, as long as there are no jaggies.
 
Bait for what ? Sorry fella but it would take a lot of Mods to make DS2 look visually impressive, and that is coming from a huge DS fan. From what we have seen of Bloodbourne, Bloodbourne >> DS2 downsampled from 3k & 4xsmaa. There is only so much a bit of AA and downsampling can do and that is tied directly to the quality of assets from the start.

I stand by what I said its comparable.
Neither look all that imo.
A opinion which can change when I actually play BB.
 
I stand by what I said its comparable.
Neither look all that imo.
A opinion which can change when I actually play BB.

Well you can believe whatever you wish, but even from these terrible screengrabs from a poor quality youtube vid shows that BB is way ahead.
Look at the lighting, shadows, textures..etc. BB is exactly what it should be, the next step up from last gen.. The only thing your pics have an upper hand with is AA, and that it is be expected when downsampling from such high resolution and adding other AA methods to boot.

maxresdefault.jpg
GnK-h.jpg


Why is this discussion about graphics anyway ? it is supposed to be about that last-gen FPS.
 
Also, before you go on with the Ryse angle, just take note that I do own DS2. There is only one version I own and it's the same as you.