Is console exclusivity good for gamers? Is it good for the industry?

Plainview

I am a sinner.
Sep 11, 2013
48,130
25,387
4,279
With Microsoft securing a major coup, Rise of the Tomb Raider being exclusive to the Xbox One, questions arise. Is this good for gamers? Is this good for the gaming industry?

On paper, this looks like it sucks for gamers. For those of us that only own one console, seeing a game we were waiting to play end up on another console really twists our balls. I mean, how could they do this? Don’t they know that I’ve been dying to play it? I’ve bought all of their games prior to this and now I can’t buy this one. SCREW YOU (INSERT COMPANY NAME)!

I can understand the frustration some gamers are feeling now. Even though I never really felt pissed that another game was exclusive to another console, I can still understand the frustration. You were hoping to play a game on the console you just shelled out over $400 for only to see it end up on another console. It’s frustrating. Many of us can’t justify owning two consoles. I know I can’t justify it. When consoles were cheaper, or launched far apart, it was different story.

d93y8p0.jpg

In the past I had both SNES and Genesis. They came out far enough apart, and were cheap enough, to justify owning both. I mean, we had to play Sonic and Mario, am I right? The only game I could have seen my buy an SNES for, I had Genesis first, was Street Fighter 2. It was exclusive to the SNES for about a year if memory serves. Sega Genesis ended up getting Street Fighter 2: Special Champion Edition. If I hadn’t had an SNES at the time it would have pushed me to buy one. While I can understand the negative feedback the Tomb Raider exclusive deal has garnered, one thing remains certain, exclusives are necessary for the future of the video game industry.

Each console already has first party exclusive. Some may say that’s enough exclusives per console and that multiplatform games should come out on all consoles at the same time. If that were the case there would be one dominant console. The dominant console would be the one with the most power and price trade off along with the following the console has. It wouldn’t happen overnight but it would happen. We’ve seen it already with the Xbox One and PlayStation 4. If multiplatform games look and perform better on the PlayStation 4, what’s the reason to buy an Xbox One? The reason, exclusives. That includes first and third party exclusives.

B11NlJl.jpg

First part exclusives can only carry a console so far. The games don’t come out often enough and production costs are coming in at an all-time high. In order for console makers to secure a strong market share, they have to look beyond their first party exclusives. They need to secure third party exclusives in the way of wholly, timed and content exclusives

The video game industry has always been about exclusives. That's how it’s going to continue for the foreseeable future. Console makers need a reason to brag and sell their console beyond what they’re doing first party wise. While this may fan the fanboy war flames, it’s needed for the survival of the industry. Don’t look for it to change any time soon. In the end, you’re either going to end up enjoying the games by buying the other console or realize it’s not worth the money.
 
Well said. As much as I want to have access to all games, I understand the need for exclusives. In tomb raiders case, it sounded like MS is involved in some way. The money coming in from those interested parties can also fund a game that may not have happened otherwise( though I think tomb raider was probably a given).

As long as these big companies are heavily competing we will continue to see improvements in the hobby we all love.

Battle it out, big two...Battle it out...
 
Exclusives deals wouldn't happen unless it benefited both companies in the long run. I understand the need for exclusives. There is a reason that the Xbox exclusive library has grown so immensely huge.
 
I don't really believe it's bad for the actual industry. People say that word and really only mean themselves, not anybody else. It's good for the dev/pub because they get a nice juicy paycheck out of the deal, and odds are that this will still release on other platforms at some point. For MS, they give more reasons for gamers to steer toward the X1 and begin earning a reputation of being the console with the most playable exclusives, timed/permanent. At the end of the day, it's a business. You can either choose to wait, by an X1, or never buy the game outright.
 
I've got zero issues with console exclusives. They incite people to buy consoles. If the game warrants me buying me a console, I'll buy it.
 
it's kinda funny cause all of a sudden ppl start saying console exclusives are bad for gaming
some of the comments sections are hilarious.


The video game industry has always been about exclusives. That's how it’s going to continue for the foreseeable future. Console makers need a reason to brag and sell their console beyond what they’re doing first party wise. While this may fan the fanboy war flames, it’s needed for the survival of the industry. Don’t look for it to change any time soon. In the end, you’re either going to end up enjoying the games by buying the other console or realize it’s not worth the money.

i agree with you right there.
 
I don't care about timed exclusives as long as they are timed and not permanent. But it is good that Mixrosoft and Sony fight for our sake even if it means we do have to take some disappointments such as "Microsoft won exclusivity of my favorite game!"
 
As someone who only ever owns one console, I don't like them. I get that MS is going to promote Halo games and keep them exclusive, but Tomb Raider? Does MS really have to keep that title away from Sony?
 
Is TR even really exclusive or just timed?

As far as 3rd party game exclusivity it's a stupid move on the part of the dev/publisher, it could be damaging to the series if they limit it to just one platform, especially to the one that's behind in sales. The last TR game sold better on PS3/PS4 than it did on 360/X1 globally so I'm sure MS had to pay out the rear to get this deal even if it is just timed. We don't live in the 90's or early 2000's anymore, developers/publishers need all of the exposure for their products they can get, it costs too much to make games now. That's why the prevailing wisdom has been that 3rd party exclusives will become more rare and they have.
 
Last edited:
If a company is willing to pay the big bucks to secure the big games, I think they deserve the big rewards.
 
Sounds like to me that this game isn't coming to PS4... this title will likely be XB1 exclusive.
It was stated earlier that this was a genuine exclusive, not timed. I think its just hard for some people to believe as TR has primarily been a multiplatform game. And I agree with PV on this one. Exclusives are important, especially to this gen. There has to be differentiating factors to separate these machines and as it stands, thats going to be what games the manufacturers supply for their product on tap. Making TR was a good move and its going to change the landscape for how exclusives are perceived. Things need to be, "GET IT HERE AND NO WHERE ELSE!" in order for this industry to thrive. Hell!, we might even get back into mascots!
 
Yup...from the horses mouth. In the end, if you want to play the game, get an X1 or play it at a friend/family member's house if they have an Xbox One.

Getting exclusives, especially big ones, not niche games... will move consoles. MP games are nice, but if you can get a game on multiple platforms, a lot of sales are missing for the other console hardware.

I think exclusives are fine. Last gen, I liked the look of Sony exclusives, so I got a PS3. Simple. I know not everyone can or will do that this gen, but that is the bed you sleep in. Get the console, or don't, but don't get all fanboyish about it when you don't get a title on your console you want badly to play.
 
It was stated earlier that this was a genuine exclusive, not timed. I think its just hard for some people to believe as TR has primarily been a multiplatform game. And I agree with PV on this one. Exclusives are important, especially to this gen. There has to be differentiating factors to separate these machines and as it stands, thats going to be what games the manufacturers supply for their product on tap. Making TR was a good move and its going to change the landscape for how exclusives are perceived. Things need to be, "GET IT HERE AND NO WHERE ELSE!" in order for this industry to thrive. Hell!, we might even get back into mascots!
Only if it's a fresh batch and not just Mario/Master Chief.
 
Well in this case it will be timed, but I don't think transitioning a multiplatform title to exclusive is healthy for the industry. If you're a casual gamer and are a fan of 3rd party titles--whether you know they're 3rd party or not--and a series you've been playing shifts unexpectedly to a console you don't own, I'd feel cheated. I'd probably be upset. I'm not sure how upsetting your fans is good business.
 
Of course it is
1 promotes competition
2 promotes sales
3 promotes console and
fanboy wars
4 promotes innovation, which to me is most important.
5 as much as I kid around about Mario eventually coming to X1. Really could you see it on there? It just wouldn't be the same.m, for Halo. Certain titles wouldn't have the aura if they went muti plat.
Now this exclusive only applies for new games. ( hence help innovate, and showcase a console)
Personally I hate it when a multi plat franchise decides to go exclusive.
Times exclusives are ok, but if say Red Dead went full out exclusive, who ever didn't get it would be justified being upset.
Everyone fattened these people pockets, everyone should be able to play.
New franchises get their pocket fattened they should show some loyalty to that fan base.
Just an opinion.
 
Kinda funny how some Xbox fans were being critical of Sony after E3 for what they said was deliberately avoiding saying if a game was timed exclusive or not yet today MS seems to be doing all they can to avoid saying that about TR while Sony made it very clear at their conference if games were truly exclusive or just timed, hell they even called the destiny content timed exclusive.
 
For sure its good for the company that secured them, but for gamers, obviously not (unless you have all consoles +PC, & Vita), ok, I kidded about Vita. I can however understand why it was done.

But I rather a new franchise, than one that already have established fanbase, like Tomb Raider. But again, that's how you make an impact. Bloodbourne & Sunset Overdrive are all third party exclusive, & I do not see people lose their mind.

My hand maybe force to get all consoles, or X1 & PC (PC will always be on the list). Before today, I am actually convinced to stick purely PC. Oh well....
 
For sure its good for the company that secured them, but for gamers, obviously not (unless you have all consoles +PC, & Vita), ok, I kidded about Vita. I can however understand why it was done.

But I rather a new franchise, than one that already have established fanbase, like Tomb Raider. But again, that's how you make an impact. Bloodbourne & Sunset Overdrive are all third party exclusive, & I do not see people lose their mind.

My hand maybe force to get all consoles, or X1 & PC (PC will always be on the list). Before today, I am actually convinced to stick purely PC. Oh well....

Bloodborne isn't really 3rd party, Sony is also working on the title.
 
Ok, thanks for the clarification.


Talk about Street fighter II. It actually make a BIG impact being exclusive to SNES. A lot of people bought the SNES just to play Street fighter 2. Street fighter 2 eventually release on Genesis, but it was too late.
 
Bloodborne isn't really 3rd party, Sony is also working on the title.

BS, its made by a third party and if Sony didn't pay it wouldn't be exclusive. The double standards are just hilarious.

I like to see people lose their sh!t over these things. :laugh:
 
BS, its made by a third party and if Sony didn't pay it wouldn't be exclusive. The double standards are just hilarious.

I like to see people lose their sh!t over these things. :laugh:

It's with Sony Japan and From Software. Sony is publishing. It's also a new IP. They're no double standards here; it's a different scenario.
 
Wait, the next Tomb Raider title is XBO exclusive?

Now is this "exclusive" (wink wink) also coming to PC or is it "EXCLUSIVE" (no wink wink) really and truly only on the XBO platform.

If the former then SE is immensely stupid. I mean weren't they just crying last year how 4m or so sales was "poor" across all platforms and now they're going to tie it to one platform.

One platform that's not even the dominant one? (pun intended).

SMH...
 
Back in the day it did not matter as I could afford/they release the consoles further apart. Now that I am older(see other thread http://unionvgf.com/index.php?threads/getting-too-old-for-this-sh-t.5267/ ) I don't care as much. Last year I was ready to jump ship from MS to SONY due to the better performance and less issues the PS4 was having but deciding to sit on the sidelines and play my 360 some more I saw MS change their system. Now I just got an XB1 and I am happy as I really like Halo and Gears which both will be on this console. I don't have the time to play lots of games so only one console at time for me. I am keeping my 360 though. Way too many good games to still play through. :)
 
  • Like
Reactions: Typhoon20
BS, its made by a third party and if Sony didn't pay it wouldn't be exclusive. The double standards are just hilarious.

I like to see people lose their sh!t over these things. :laugh:

I guess you haven't been paying attention when they constantly say being made alongside/with sony japan studio.
 
The money MS saved on their less powerful XB1 consoles now comes in handy .
 
Exclusives are good if it's for the console you like, bad if it's for the console you don't like.

Basically how it's always been.
 
Wait, the next Tomb Raider title is XBO exclusive?

Now is this "exclusive" (wink wink) also coming to PC or is it "EXCLUSIVE" (no wink wink) really and truly only on the XBO platform.

If the former then SE is immensely stupid. I mean weren't they just crying last year how 4m or so sales was "poor" across all platforms and now they're going to tie it to one platform.

One platform that's not even the dominant one? (pun intended).

SMH...

The official line is that it's exclusive FOR Holiday 2015, that makes it sound like a timed exclusive.