The 2016 United States Presidential Election Thread. v. 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
He's gonna enforce all immigration laws. That means he wants to deport all illegal immigrants. Will that included his wife who seems to be here illegally? People are saying she's here illegally. That's what people are saying. They're saying it. That's what I heard.
 
Can't become a citizen when you enter the country illegally. Except your speech stealing, Kaitlynn Jener look alike, 3rd place trophy wife? Right? People are saying she's here illegally. She's gotta go. That's what I heard.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JinCA
Plainview said:
He's s***ting all over that plaque on Ellis island. He's a f***ing a******. f*** off you anti-American c***.
Click to expand...

shocked_owl.gif
 
I said that there was only one person I truly hate on the planet and that's Giuliani. It's actually two. I f***ing hate Hannity. He's a piece of s***. A truly piece of s***.
 
Lmfao. Lewandowski just claimed Trump is going to talk to a black communities in Detroit. He's actually going to talk one on one with a news figure for TV. Lewandowski said, "But it's the biggest African American channel." Lmfao.
 
yankeessuck said:
Plainview I saved you a seat on the Hilldawg train. Jump on board
Click to expand...

I've never heard of her being coined "Hilldawg" before so I had to look it up.

zc1hf.jpg


:laugh::laugh::laugh:

Trump better beware of getting his heels nipped with those chompers.
 
Plainview said:
Lmfao. Lewandowski just claimed Trump is going to talk to a black communities in Detroit. He's actually going to talk one on one with a news figure for TV. Lewandowski said, "But it's the biggest African American channel." Lmfao.
Click to expand...

He already did. And it was tremendous.

 
Plainview said:
He wants to much deregulation... pretty much everything. The kind that would make cases like Flint Michigan a common occurrence. Tha alone is enough to not vote for him.
Click to expand...

Yeah, most libertarians that I talk to say they think being able to sue someone over something they've done will be enough to keep them from doing things that will have a harmful impact on others and that regulations don't work anyway. That doesn't make sense to me, if the regulations aren't working it's because they are either too weak to being with or aren't being enforced properly, both of which would likely be due to the fact that too many lobbyists write our regulations or are appointed to be the heads of departments that handle enforcement.
 
Last edited:
Plainview said:
I don't know how someone who says nothing, lies through his false teeth, has an extremely limited vocabulary, uses words that simply don't exist, can get a "pop" from the crowd. They must be complete morons. Utter morons. Believe me, bigly morons.
Click to expand...

Brawndo has what plants crave.
 
JinCA said:
Yeah, most libertarians that I talk to say they think being able to sue someone over something they've done will be enough to keep them from doing things that will have a harmful impact on others and that regulations don't work anyway. That doesn't make sense to me, if the regulations aren't working it's because they are either too weak to being with or aren't being enforced properly, both of which would likely be due to the fact that too many lobbyists write our regulations or are appointed to be the heads of departments that handle enforcement.
Click to expand...
I agree, completely.
 
  • Like
Reactions: JinCA
JinCA said:
Yeah, most libertarians that I talk to say they think being able to sue someone over something they've done will be enough to keep them from doing things that will have a harmful impact on others and that regulations don't work anyway. That doesn't make sense to me, if the regulations aren't working it's because they are either too weak to being with or aren't being enforced properly, both of which would likely be due to the fact that too many lobbyists write our regulations or are appointed to be the heads of departments that handle enforcement.
Click to expand...

Basically it's the whole "rule of law" being replaced by "rule of lawyers" as in the person who can afford the best lawyers can do whatever they damn well please, no matter how much it infringes on your rights or property.
 
hrudey said:
Basically it's the whole "rule of law" being replaced by "rule of lawyers" as in the person who can afford the best lawyers can do whatever they damn well please, no matter how much it infringes on your rights or property.
Click to expand...

Well, the magical part is this is intended as part of Libertarian policy at the Federal Level. The bonus being this respects State's Rights.

I think this is the card Rand Paul tried to play or how any Libertarian can dodge stupid Social issues. Marijuana?! State's Issue! Abortion? State's Issue.

I think this is actually a good way to handle some issues, but in other cases it can seem really stupid.
 
hrudey said:
Basically it's the whole "rule of law" being replaced by "rule of lawyers" as in the person who can afford the best lawyers can do whatever they damn well please, no matter how much it infringes on your rights or property.
Click to expand...

Yeah, their idea may come from what seems like a place of logic to them but it's obvious that in the real world things wouldn't play out the way many of them think they would.
 
Andy said:
I don't think or vote along party lines, so that doesn't mean much to me.
Click to expand...
I wish I could just vote for a person regardless of their politics,, or the people that work for them.
Andy said:
Even if he got into office (which isn't going to happen, so this is sort of academic), he wouldn't be able to unilaterally deregulate everything. He'd face opposition from both parties, not to mention all the vested interest groups. I'd be surprised if he got 10% of what he wanted. It's not like he'd have a party in congress or the senate behind him. He'd have to win them over. If you look at his state record, he did a great job fiscally, but I just know the political machine was not happy with him. He's not the kind of figure that a bunch of republicans and democrats are going to rally around. That's why he's independent in the first place.

Anyhow, I'll continue to read more about him as we get closer to erection day. All I know is that I don't trust or respect either Hillary or Trump, and I can't in good conscience vote for either of them. So for me, it's basically a choice between skipping the election and finding an alternative I can vote for.
Click to expand...
Harambe is gaining in the polls.
 
Spiritech said:
The whole interview with Anderson Cooper.



"The wall will have tunnel technology."


591.gif
Click to expand...

Anderson Cooper is a brilliant, well spoken and educated gentleman.

Why on earth would you allow Trump to be contrasted next him, if you were his campaign leader?!

He sounds like a drunk Frat boy, that raises his voice, instead of his argument.


Also, found this pretty funny. (And yes, thats a drag queen)
 
Last edited:
JinCA said:
Honestly I don't care one way or the other if he stands or not, it's his right to do what he wants. My thing is if you are going to "protest" and you are a person of financial means than you should be out there actively trying to change what it is you think is wrong, not just sitting down or making a song about it (which makes even more money for you) and leaving it at that. People in that position need to start recruiting young people with character to run for office and backing them financially so they can help make change from within. What he's doing now isn't going to change anyone's mind who doesn't already agree or disagree with his position so it's really just a waste.
Click to expand...
I have no idea who the bloke is (I think a basketball player?), But by sitting down during a majorly televised event, he has created a discussion for free.

It's a discussion that's so powerful, it's reached a political thread in a videogame forum, where people who are all around the world would never have heard it.

I don't know he full story, so I can't comment on he intricacies, but if I were to write the headline, "Man sits, over-patriotic people s***."

And there's never a winner when you're an expendable celeb, speaking out in a way that is a zealot of patriotism. Look at the Dixie Chicks, and their record sales.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back