YouTube Network "Deceived Customers" With Paid-For Xbox One Videos

menace-uk-

Starfield Gazer
Sep 11, 2013
37,539
15,541
3,930
The United States government has determined that some Xbox One video materials from around the time of the system's launch in November 2013 qualified as "deceptive marketing." The Federal Trade Commission (FTC) announced on Wednesday that popular YouTube network Machinima--which claims to have more than 400 million unique subscribers--has agreed to settle charges related to publishing positive videos about the Xbox One without disclosing it had been paid tens of thousands of dollars to do so. Microsoft, meanwhile, is mostly absolved of wrongdoing.

According to the FTC, Machinima paid YouTubers--called "influencers"--to post videos that spoke positively about the Xbox One and some of its games. This is not necessarily a problem, but the FTC alleges that the YouTubers "failed to adequately disclose" that they were being paid for what were presented as objective videos. A pair of YouTubers were paid $45,000 between them to publish two video reviews each, both of which beamed positive messages about Xbox One without stating that they were paid endorsements


"When people see a product touted online, they have a right to know whether they're looking at an authentic opinion or a paid marketing pitch," FTC Bureau of Consumer Protection director Jessica Rich said in a news release. "That's true whether the endorsement appears in a video or any other media."

The FTC's complaint also outlines another phase of the paid-for Xbox One campaign. "In a separate phase of the marketing program, Machinima promised to pay a larger group of influencers $1 for every 1,000 video views, up to a total of $25,000," it said. "Machinima did not require any of the influencers to disclose they were being paid for their endorsement."

As part of the settlement, Machinima is required to ensure the people it pays to make videos "clearly disclose when they have been compensated in exchange for their endorsements." This applies to all future Xbox-related materials and everything else.

But does Microsoft bear any responsibility in this case? In short, not really.

"While Microsoft and Starcom both were responsible for the influencers' failure to disclose their material connection to the companies, [FTC Commission] staff considered the fact that these appeared to be isolated incidents that occurred in spite of, and not in the absence of, policies and procedures designed to prevent such lapses," the FTC said. "The companies also quickly required Machinima to remedy the situation after they learned that Machinima was paying influencers without making the necessary disclosures."

We have followed up with Microsoft to see if the company has any further comment to provide. You can read the FTC's full complaint against Machinima here [PDF].

Earlier this year, the UK's Advertising Standards Authority said ithas yet to receive one official complaint, despite widespread debate over clandestine paid game promotions on video websites such as Twitch and YouTube.

Microsoft's response
"We are pleased that the FTC recognized Microsoft has vigorous compliance processes and procedures for sponsored campaigns," a representative said in a statement.


I imagine this happens a lot with a lot of products. I know this one is specifically about the Xbox One but lets try to stay away from console wars and talk about the actual issue, which is deceiving consumers with paid for advertisements presented as objective opinions.
 
Yesterday there was a gal making rounds on TV news shows that had been hired by Ashley Madison (the cheaters website) to do similar deceptions. She said that 90% of the female profiles on the website are fake and controlled by the Ashley Madison employees to milk money from unsuspecting male customers looking for an affair.

I've heard stories of all the fake reviews on Amazon done by employees of various products because getting 4 or 5 star reviews can mean the difference in tens to hundreds of thousands of dollars in revenue.

And video games have their stories of shill reporters getting paid off for reviews, magazines softening reviews with ad dollars, and on and on and on.

Buyer Beware!
 
Quite shocking, no way would $ony and Nintendo do "anything" like this.
Its often not the question of if one engaged in controverial business actions, which almost all corperation will be guility for, but rather how far the actions are. Some just went a bit too far.

Very few things are Yes/No, or all/none.

I would say MS is pushing slightly over the edge of the reasonable limit, there are corpoeration that went much further, & others that does controverial things but within 'reasonable' limits.
 
Last edited:
It was just after I had finished washing my hair the amazing Pantene Pro-V Shampoo and Pantene Pro-V Conditioner, which is good for all hair types, that I went into my lounge room, sat down on my extremely comfortable Lay-z-Boy recliner, which supports you for hours of reclining without any discomfort, that I saw on my Samsung Galaxy Tab, in a crisp, bright high resolution format, that some people are willing to fudge their opinions for pay?

I will not stand for that! No matter how comfortable my Nike Air Jordans are, nor how much they support my ankles and arches, I will not sell out in such a way... Ever!!!

(unless someone is willing to pay? I accept wine, troll dolls, or maybe cash)
 
It was just after I had finished washing my hair the amazing Pantene Pro-V Shampoo and Pantene Pro-V Conditioner, which is good for all hair types, that I went into my lounge room, sat down on my extremely comfortable Lay-z-Boy recliner, which supports you for hours of reclining without any discomfort, that I saw on my Samsung Galaxy Tab, in a crisp, bright high resolution format, that some people are willing to fudge their opinions for pay?

I will not stand for that! No matter how comfortable my Nike Air Jordans are, nor how much they support my ankles and arches, I will not sell out in such a way... Ever!!!

(unless someone is willing to pay? I accept wine, troll dolls, or maybe cash)

The issue is not that they fudged their opinions for pay. The issue is they presented their opinions as being objective and never stated that it was a paid for endorsement.
 
Great. Now if we could just get the FTC to investigate politicians and "news" broadcasters... :crazy:
 
  • Like
Reactions: blofeld65
This explains the positive Ryse reviews.

Boo. That game us underrated, if anything. I understand it's criticisms, but still found it very enjoyable. It was a 7 out of 10 fame, and it reviewed at tad lower, I believe.

Evolve, on the other hand was so diconnected from the previews/reviews for me that it screams 'paid for' hype.
 
Damn, for a second I thought this was gonna be about how premium youtube videos don't work on the xbox. Not sure if it does on the X1, but the 360 was a no-go for me.
 
This is why major review sites suck now. Even when they aren't directly getting paid, they never want to anger any of the big publishers and be shut out of future access.
 
It was just after I had finished washing my hair the amazing Pantene Pro-V Shampoo and Pantene Pro-V Conditioner, which is good for all hair types, that I went into my lounge room, sat down on my extremely comfortable Lay-z-Boy recliner, which supports you for hours of reclining without any discomfort, that I saw on my Samsung Galaxy Tab, in a crisp, bright high resolution format, that some people are willing to fudge their opinions for pay?

I will not stand for that! No matter how comfortable my Nike Air Jordans are, nor how much they support my ankles and arches, I will not sell out in such a way... Ever!!!

(unless someone is willing to pay? I accept wine, troll dolls, or maybe cash)
post of the month....
 
  • Like
Reactions: Registered User 1
I very rarely read game reviews anymore. Usually if I see a potentially interesting game coming out that I'm unsure about getting, I wait for it to come out, and watch threads in forums to see what actual unpaid people who spent their hard earned money on the game have to say. I saw an article from VERGE blasting the Mad Max games yet have seen a lot of people in forums talking about how much they enjoy the game.
 
According to the FTC, Machinima paid YouTubers--called "influencers"--to post videos that spoke positively about the Xbox One and some of its games. This is not necessarily a problem, but the FTC alleges that the YouTubers "failed to adequately disclose" that they were being paid for what were presented as objective videos. A pair of YouTubers were paid $45,000 between them to publish two video reviews each, both of which beamed positive messages about Xbox One without stating that they were paid endorsements
That's shady videogaming at it's finest. And not surprising.

Disclosure is among the most basic principles when it comes to advertising and product pitches. You won't learn that in a marketing class, but any company in the real world whose marketing managers have an ounce of professionalism knows about disclosure.

The companies offering the deals to the partnering company doesn't have to disclose anything. It's that final spoke in the wheel that has to disclose to the public.

Unfortunately, the number of websites, YT guys, bloggers etc... who actually disclose a deal is in place is probably 1%. And they get away with it.
 
Technically Microsoft isn't responsible. But the whole practice of "influencers" is lame.

Sony have done it. So have many others. Always lame.
 
Most of the "real" reviews would be influenced too I think. If you know that your wage is coming from an advertiser that has booked 5 weeks worth of ads and themes plastered over your site, you're probably going to be more lenient with your judgement...