Since when has using 'unnamed sources' in journalism been a problem ? I thought it was the standard for those that do not wish to be identified and face possible repercussions of talking publicly.
Because it's being used as an excuse to write barely true articles for the page clicks. It has happened from both sides, with places making articles based on MisterX's insiders, or CBOAT's claim, or some anonymous dev, it all boils down to bulls***, especially when people who don't have a problem coming forward have said contradictory statements to this 'anon' sources