GTA V Remastered runs 1080p on PS4

Status
Not open for further replies.
I don't think we know yet what the Xbox One resolution is, so "only on PS4" seems premature. It may work out that way, but we should save the dick-waving until it's confirmed.
 
  • Like
Reactions: The Living Tribunal
[QUOTE="VaLLiancE, post: 264986, member: 14"full HD is only on PS4(and PC) in the example I was referring 2.

Your failure to actually get this with a sheet load of off topic responses shows your butt hurt and what sucks about these forums :)[/QUOTE]

You couldn't possibly be just talking about GTAV though as the X1 version hasn't had the resolution confirmed.
I think you're the one who is butt hurt. Your trolling has stepped up a notch since the failure of Driveclub to be the supposed Forza killer that is struggling to get people online even though there's only around a million copies floating around. Dat PSN? Can read you like a book buddy.
Also I own an X1, PS4 (which i unfortunately bought for all these amazing exclusives lol) and a gaming PC so i can take my pick but as i'm primarily going back to GTAV for online that's a no brainer to buy on X1.:laugh:
 
Last edited:
I don't think we know yet what the Xbox One resolution is, so "only on PS4" seems premature. It may work out that way, but we should save the dick-waving until it's confirmed.

Come on, didnt you know the Internets turns everyone into John Holmes...
 

You couldn't possibly be just talking about GTAV though as the X1 version hasn't had the resolution confirmed.
I think you're the one who is butt hurt. Your trolling has stepped up a notch since the failure of Driveclub to be the supposed Forza killer that is struggling to get people online even though there's only around a million copies floating around. Dat PSN? Can read you like a book buddy.
Also I own an X1, PS4 (which i unfortunately bought for all these amazing exclusives lol) and a gaming PC so i can take my pick but as i'm primarily going back to GTAV for online that's a no brainer to buy on X1.:laugh:[/QUOTE]
Now you bring up DC last time i checked i never said anything positive about it. I think Forza 5 is the best racer OH NOES! you missed when I said that eh? What are you bloody smoking!? Oopz Its not drugs must be dat butt hurtness lolz yeah you mad.
PSN is better but that's OT as are all of the things you have said due to being butt hurt.
Buying inferior versions of games :laugh:
Sarcastic comment regarding PS4 exclusives when XBO aint got sheet either.
 
Actually Val you said more than once that DC would have the better Meta scores but anyways.

Again no resolution has been confirmed by the developers. But they should be able to do 1080p on both.
 
I don't think we know yet what the Xbox One resolution is, so "only on PS4" seems premature. It may work out that way, but we should save the dick-waving until it's confirmed.

The source comes from a Playstation Magazine so yeah -- they wouldn't say or ask what the resolution is.
 
I played a decent amount of this game on 360, but didn't even come close to finishing the campaign (I spend most of my time exploring and causing problems).

My biggest disappointment with it was the massive amount of jaggies, so I'm psyched to see it looking as good as I wanted it to!
 
hopefully it's at least 900P on X1.

I'll be getting it on PS4 and probably PC later. But gloating about whatever (possible) differences there may be is silly, petty and presumptuous.
 
We don't know the XB1 resolution. For that simple fact there is absolutely no reason to even discuss one version being full HD and another not.
Until facts surface it is purely speculation and therefore trolling as far as I'm concerned.
No need for it.
 
YW

somebody has to speak the truth even when its painful right?

Hardly painful man. Let's just assume it's 900p. It really is not the end of the world. Yes i would like every X1 game to be the highest resolution, but at the same time i look at Metro Redux, Shadow of Mordor and Ryse and i'm like.....ok it's alright. I barely see a differnce with Metro and Mordor...if at all and Ryse is one of the best looking, if not best looking current gen game.

If Rockstar has most (hopefully everything) the same things on X1 as PS4 in 900p resolution, i am alright with that.

I don't think we know yet what the Xbox One resolution is, so "only on PS4" seems premature. It may work out that way, but we should save the dick-waving until it's confirmed.

It's clear that Sony has yet again a deal with Rockstar. They had it with GTA V and only showing PS3 version to the press and now with PS4 as well, so it is possible i guess that they only announced PS4's resolution. It's also possible that MS don't want it out there was the resolution is. Whatever the case....i won't complain if it's 900p. Like someone said on this forum recently...900p is the sweet spot for X1.
 
It'll be 1080p and 60 fps on the xb1. You know, the power of the cloud and all that jazz.
 
Hardly painful man. Let's just assume it's 900p. It really is not the end of the world. Yes i would like every X1 game to be the highest resolution, but at the same time i look at Metro Redux, Shadow of Mordor and Ryse and i'm like.....ok it's alright. I barely see a differnce with Metro and Mordor...if at all and Ryse is one of the best looking, if not best looking current gen game.

If Rockstar has most (hopefully everything) the same things on X1 as PS4 in 900p resolution, i am alright with that.



It's clear that Sony has yet again a deal with Rockstar. They had it with GTA V and only showing PS3 version to the press and now with PS4 as well, so it is possible i guess that they only announced PS4's resolution. It's also possible that MS don't want it out there was the resolution is. Whatever the case....i won't complain if it's 900p. Like someone said on this forum recently...900p is the sweet spot for X1.
Its painful for some shouldn't be but it is...especially if they own both formats as they can just buy the better version.
 
Wouldn't Rockstar just be able to update the game like Shadow of Mordor had on day one? Apparently you can do that.

As for the game itself, eh. I keep coming in and out of wanting it, mostly out. If I haven't picked it up for the 360, then I don't see myself getting for the X1 outside of a GWG deal.
 
We don't know the XB1 resolution. For that simple fact there is absolutely no reason to even discuss one version being full HD and another not.
Until facts surface it is purely speculation and therefore trolling as far as I'm concerned.
No need for it.

Absolutely this. Yeah you can tell certain posters are just hoping its not 1080p on X1 so they can troll it, then go back to being all "stealth."

i expect it to be 900p on X1, but maybe they'll surprise us.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dno69
I played the hell out of this on the360 so I'm not interested this time around. I'll have plenty of games keeping me busy.
 
Wouldn't Rockstar just be able to update the game like Shadow of Mordor had on day one? Apparently you can do that.

As for the game itself, eh. I keep coming in and out of wanting it, mostly out. If I haven't picked it up for the 360, then I don't see myself getting for the X1 outside of a GWG deal.

Game is fantastic. Best GTA since Vice City IMO.
 
I think honestly, MS is not making it easy for developers (like PS3 last gen). I think if honestly answered, most developers will tell you they rather X1 & PS4 closer in power than it is now (30-50% estimated), & have a simpler, faster 8gb DDR5.

Then there will be no need to have the dilemma to enforce parity, which will anger fans of the more powerful machine, or push each system to its limit & then the performance difference will be apparent, then fans of weaker machine will be angry, upset & subject of trolling by fanboys of more powerful machine. Or they can have a more subtle effects like less stuff or effects on screen, so both side of fans will be less upset. Because effects or AA are hard to quantify(unlike say FPS & Res).

You just cannot win as developer no matter the decision.

900p/1080p is about 40% difference, so its roughly the performance difference between PS4 & X1. If MS and X1 fans can accept that game will be a mostly min of 900p (With higher res a possibility), then I think its a nice middle ground for the console game development to move forward instead of continuous debate of parity, force parity, disparity.
 
I think honestly, MS is not making it easy for developers (like PS3 last gen). I think if honestly answered, most developers will tell you they rather X1 & PS4 closer in power than it is now (30-50% estimated), & have a simpler, faster 8gb DDR5.

Then there will be no need to have the dilemma to enforce parity, which will anger fans of the more powerful machine, or push each system to its limit & then the performance difference will be apparent, then fans of weaker machine will be angry, upset & subject of trolling by fanboys of more powerful machine. Or they can have a more subtle effects like less stuff or effects on screen, so both side of fans will be less upset. Because effects or AA are hard to quantify(unlike say FPS & Res).

You just cannot win as developer no matter the decision.

900p/1080p is about 40% difference, so its roughly the performance difference between PS4 & X1. If MS and X1 fans can accept that game will be a mostly min of 900p (With higher res a possibility), then I think its a nice middle ground for the console game development to move forward instead of continuous debate of parity, force parity, disparity.


and 900p to 1080p is such a small difference. Just just shows how much 40% extra power actually = in the real world. I would much rather have 900P and solid FPS than force 1080P because of fanboy wars.
 
and 900p to 1080p is such a small difference. Just just shows how much 40% extra power actually = in the real world. I would much rather have 900P and solid FPS than force 1080P because of fanboy wars.
60 vs 30fps is also not super obvious but required double the performance. Thats is why we still have so many games running at 30fps. The trade off to run a game at 60fps is massive.

However, if these 40% premium can be used for say make the world more rich, dense, or more details on existing world, than its more meaningful, & you can see the difference. But no multiplatform dev will want to do this, because unlike resolution, AA, or FPS, game details are hard to scale or turn on/off. You cannot scale a character model for instance by 30%. It doesn't work like that.


That is why, although the power difference between PS4 and X1 is about 40%, you do not feel so visually in comparison.

This is also why cross gen games just do not look as good as next gen game, even when next gen game run at higher res & texture density. Just look at dragon age. Because they have to share the same low poly world, & 5-10K character models, though next gen is capable of character models of over 70k.
 
the xb1 ver was 1080p but lowered it to 900p to avoid parity debate :p
 
and 900p to 1080p is such a small difference. Just just shows how much 40% extra power actually = in the real world. I would much rather have 900P and solid FPS than force 1080P because of fanboy wars.

Ryse is flashing it's best looking game award right now.
 
I have both and have found for me that the best version to get rarely has had anything to do with resolution differences and more on other factors like content, online play, controller comfort, and/or friends.
 
60 vs 30fps is also not super obvious but required double the performance. Thats is why we still have so many games running at 30fps. The trade off to run a game at 60fps is massive.

However, if these 40% premium can be used for say make the world more rich, dense, or more details on existing world, than its more meaningful, & you can see the difference. But no multiplatform dev will want to do this, because unlike resolution, AA, or FPS, game details are hard to scale or turn on/off. You cannot scale a character model for instance by 30%. It doesn't work like that.


That is why, although the power difference between PS4 and X1 is about 40%, you do not feel so visually in comparison.

This is also why cross gen games just do not look as good as next gen game, even when next gen game run at higher res & texture density. Just look at dragon age. Because they have to share the same low poly world, & 5-10K character models, though next gen is capable of character models of over 70k.
900p against 1080p isnt 40%. Not in the real world. Try harder....
 
Status
Not open for further replies.