Suppressors dont silence a weapon. Its still very loud. Especially if you use sonic rounds. They make it possible to not need ear protection on some guns. The argument is really no use to either side IMO. They dont make guns silent like the left wants to believe, and they dont really have a great benefit of quieting the sound other than the fact it may save some ear damage. In a hunting situation it will probably help with how far the sound travels. Its not like how they are portrayed in the movies at all. Not even close.
If the Vegas guy had used on it would have most likely cause a misfire within 200 rounds. They get very hot very fast.
It lowers the sound from 140dB to around 120-130dB, this is the range that will not cause damage to the human ear. While the supersonic crack is still loud as well as the shot itself it is still far more enjoyable to shoot. A firearm with a suppressor is still as loud as a jackhammer or an ambulance, so it's not some super-secret killing machine. Hell they're legal in Europe.Hunters say that it helps muffle the sound of the shot so that they dont scare off their prey. However the NRA is arguing that silencers don't really do much to muffle the sound of a shot. So why the need for silencers? These idiots cant get their arguments straight.
From cnn. Us has 31% of the worlds mass shootings, but 5% of the worlds population.
What's quite pathetic is that, right wingers would rather have a list of people who voted instead of people who own a gun. I guess one constitutional right is worth more than others, or do they skip the first amendment, read the second one, than negate the rest?
The NRA is just scary powerful. They own enough of congress that it doesn't matter what anyone thinks. The NRA is so big they don't just target Republicans but Democrats as well.
http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-spending-budget-lobbying-in-2017-2017-9
Here's what the NRA thinks of you (us)
The NRA is just scary powerful. They own enough of congress that it doesn't matter what anyone thinks. The NRA is so big they don't just target Republicans but Democrats as well.
http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-spending-budget-lobbying-in-2017-2017-9
Here's what the NRA thinks of you (us)
The NRA is just scary powerful. They own enough of congress that it doesn't matter what anyone thinks. The NRA is so big they don't just target Republicans but Democrats as well.
http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-spending-budget-lobbying-in-2017-2017-9
Here's what the NRA thinks of you (us)
The NRA is just scary powerful. They own enough of congress that it doesn't matter what anyone thinks. The NRA is so big they don't just target Republicans but Democrats as well.
http://www.businessinsider.com/nra-spending-budget-lobbying-in-2017-2017-9
Here's what the NRA thinks of you (us)
I think that had to do with the millions of people across the country who wrote that Congress men and women, those who protested, those who called, those who stated that they laws they were trying to put in place where Ludacris and outrageous. I can also point to the fact that Converse all that gun control is a losing battle in anywhere else besides New York California and other Democratic strongholds. Those outside of major Metro areas and those outside of media do not often hold the same view. Again the NRA is a very weak lobbying group.Yep. They're pretty powerful. When a school full of dead children wasn't enough to change things, you know they've won.
The nra, sure. Conveniently, I’m sure by design, you are ignoring the millions, upon millions, its members, gun manufacturers, ammo manufacturers, donate for their gun totin’, rootin’ tootin’, outdated dogma, outside of the “nra”.Yet another myth, the NRA barely gives to those in Congress, compared to other lobbying groups, they don't control Congress they couldn't even rent them for the lousy 3 million they give a year. And that was in a presidential election year.
https://www.opensecrets.org/orgs/summary.php?id=d000000082
You want to see who owns Congress, take a look at how much employee unions and pharmaceutical companies donate to Congress. I'm not disputing that they're not owned I'm just disputing who owns them. The gun lobby is weak
I think that had to do with the millions of people across the country who wrote that Congress men and women, those who protested, those who called, those who stated that they laws they were trying to put in place where Ludacris and outrageous. I can also point to the fact that Converse all that gun control is a losing battle in anywhere else besides New York California and other Democratic strongholds. Those outside of major Metro areas and those outside of media do not often hold the same view. Again the NRA is a very weak lobbying group.
Hey, I don't live in your country and as much as I respect it, I'm glad I don't. I don't want to live anywhere that thinks it's ok to change nothing after nearly 30 children are murdered.
I’m assuming being 2500 miles away is his alibi.Does the brother have an alibi for the night of the shooting?