Official Thread Star Wars Jedi: Survivor
- Thread starter karmakid
- Start date
-
- Tags
- fallen order jedi sequel star wars
*edit to update link
news.xbox.com
How Star Wars Jedi: Survivor Breaks the Metroidvania Mold - Xbox Wire
Cal Kestis is back and more powerful than ever in Star Wars: Jedi Survivor. Read more about how Cal's abilities have evolved ahead of the game's launch on April 28.
news.xbox.com
Last edited:
'Star Wars Jedi: Survivor' Is Coming in Very Hot, But Dark Souls and Star Wars Is Still Fun
What to make of 10 hours with a video game that had performance issues, only to have many of those issues disappear right before release? A conundrum.
www.vice.com
Sounds like the game's performance is dogsh*t no matter where you play it. Shame.
Last edited:
Loved the first one, this sounds to be a more expansive and refined version of that, I'll buy it.
Hopefully it will be patched and performing perfectly by the time I finish the first game and finally get to this. I'm in no rush.
Sounds like a good time following Sony's narrative footprint if this guy's words are to be trusted.
I started but didn't finish the first one yet
Sounds like console is the way to go for now at least 
In short, Jedi: Survivor not only joins the list of poorly optimized titles on PC, but it is one of the worst so far this year, much worse than The Last of Us Part I, since the latter in 4K at with the Ryzen 9 5950X and RTX 3080 Ti, it never went below 40 FPS, but the general average is 60, since in many parts it stays at 70-80 FPS. Broadly speaking, Jedi: Survivor is closer to Hogwarts Legacy optimization or The Callisto Protocol WITH ray tracing. While there is preloading of shaders, there is traversal stuttering (fixed stuttering when entering or leaving certain zones) and as I mentioned previously, the big issue with VRAM which will cause highly inconsistent frametime, remote texture popping and late loading or erratic of the same,
At 1080p with everything maxed out, the game can eat up to 11GB of VRAM in the most open spots, while the bottleneck in some graphics-heavy spots doesn't help either. To put it simply, if you don't want VRAM issues to play 1080p, you'll need a board with 12GB of VRAM, whereas 16GB would be ideal for 1440p and 4K (and I don't think more than 16GB will be required in the future, unless the game doesn't have DLSS 2 or FSR 2, both of which help reduce VRAM usage by 1-1.5GB). While it runs at 4K at 30 FPS and 1440p at 60 FPS on consoles, for its quality and performance mode respectively, on PC there will probably be a lot of complaints about its performance and Nvidia will once again be the focus of contention for lashing out on the game. amount of memory from mid-range motherboards like the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070.
Summary:
No DLSS Support since this is an AMD sponsored title.
VRAM issues plaguing even the 12GB 3080 Ti
Prolonged Stuttering/pop-in plentiful
Overusage of VRAM, spikes to 20GB
FextraLife says the game's performance on PC is really bad. Calls it abysmal. Does not recommend getting it on PC. Says XBox version is fine. Single digit dips through out the game's 20-25 hour campaign on a 3080Ti at 1440p high settings.
Source: https://www.pcmrace.com/2023/04/26/star-wars-jedi-survivor-review/
In short, Jedi: Survivor not only joins the list of poorly optimized titles on PC, but it is one of the worst so far this year, much worse than The Last of Us Part I, since the latter in 4K at with the Ryzen 9 5950X and RTX 3080 Ti, it never went below 40 FPS, but the general average is 60, since in many parts it stays at 70-80 FPS. Broadly speaking, Jedi: Survivor is closer to Hogwarts Legacy optimization or The Callisto Protocol WITH ray tracing. While there is preloading of shaders, there is traversal stuttering (fixed stuttering when entering or leaving certain zones) and as I mentioned previously, the big issue with VRAM which will cause highly inconsistent frametime, remote texture popping and late loading or erratic of the same,
At 1080p with everything maxed out, the game can eat up to 11GB of VRAM in the most open spots, while the bottleneck in some graphics-heavy spots doesn't help either. To put it simply, if you don't want VRAM issues to play 1080p, you'll need a board with 12GB of VRAM, whereas 16GB would be ideal for 1440p and 4K (and I don't think more than 16GB will be required in the future, unless the game doesn't have DLSS 2 or FSR 2, both of which help reduce VRAM usage by 1-1.5GB). While it runs at 4K at 30 FPS and 1440p at 60 FPS on consoles, for its quality and performance mode respectively, on PC there will probably be a lot of complaints about its performance and Nvidia will once again be the focus of contention for lashing out on the game. amount of memory from mid-range motherboards like the RTX 3060 Ti and RTX 3070.
Summary:
No DLSS Support since this is an AMD sponsored title.
VRAM issues plaguing even the 12GB 3080 Ti
Prolonged Stuttering/pop-in plentiful
Overusage of VRAM, spikes to 20GB
FextraLife says the game's performance on PC is really bad. Calls it abysmal. Does not recommend getting it on PC. Says XBox version is fine. Single digit dips through out the game's 20-25 hour campaign on a 3080Ti at 1440p high settings.
Source: https://www.pcmrace.com/2023/04/26/star-wars-jedi-survivor-review/
Dono but the first one. And Respawn had a whole support team dedicated to PC, granted they’re busy working on apex….so, um, yeah, they need another studio. Cos I think respawn is the only ea studio that works with unreal engine 4, had they switched to 5 this game would still be in development.