The GOP's little rule change they hoped you wouldn't notice

I prefer my political nonsense in article form. Political youtube vids scream of tinfoil hattedness.
 
Ok, heres some information about the video..

a guy is talking to a member of the political party.. I hope that answers all your questions..
 
Ok, heres some information about the video..

a guy is talking to a member of the political party.. I hope that answers all your questions..
In that case I completely agree. Anyone who doesn't agree is just ill-informed.
 
Why temporarily nullify the first seven amendments? How does that help them do their job and get the government back up and running?
 
Good Ol Uncle Sam



This wasn't as good a rule change as when Obama granted a special permit so illegal aliens could demonstrate on the national mall, while directing the park service to arrest the families of war heroes trying to go to the various war memorials.

Starving out the single moms seems a small price to pay to get rid of Obama Care. Im hoping these cuts go permanent like the Sequester cuts last year.
 
In the hours working up to the government shutdown on Sept. 30, Republican members of the House Rules Committee were developing a strategy to keep a clean CR off the floor, guaranteeing the government would remain shut down.

Though at least 28 House Republicans have publicly said they would support a clean CR if it were brought to the floor -- enough votes for the government to reopen when combined with Democratic support -- a House rule passed just before the shutdown essentially prevents that vote from taking place.

During a floor speech on Saturday, Rep. Chris Van Hollen (D-Md.) drew attention to the quietly passed rule when he attempted to present a motion to accept the Senate's clean continuing resolution and reopen the government.

Rep. Jason Chaffetz (R-Utah), presiding over the chamber, told Van Hollen that the rule he was asking to use had been "altered" and he did not have the privilege of bringing that vote to the floor. In the ensuing back and forth, Chaffetz said the recently passed House Resolution 368 trumped the standing rules. Where any member of the House previously could have brought the clean resolution to the floor under House Rule 22, House Resolution 368 -- passed on the eve of the shutdown -- gave that right exclusively to the House majority leader, Rep. Eric Cantor of Virginia.

"The Rules Committee, under the rules of the House, changed the standing rules of the House to take away the right of any member to move to vote to open the government, and gave that right exclusively to the Republican Leader," said Van Hollen. "Is that right?"

"The House adopted that resolution," replied Chaffetz.

"I make my motion, Mr. Speaker," said Van Hollen. "I renew my motion that under the regular standing rules of the House... that the house take up the Senate amendments and open the government now."

"Under section 2 of H.R. 368, that motion may be offered only by the majority leader or his designee," Chaffetz said.

"Mr. Speaker, why were the rules rigged to keep the government shut down?" Van Hollen asked.

"The gentleman will suspend," Chaffetz interjected.

In print for those who wish too read.