I was just joshing you. It just had to suck because it was before the Sony era (BCE), if you get my drift...
Uncharted 4
- Thread starter Andy
- Start date
I was just joshing you. It just had to suck because it was before the Sony era (BCE), if you get my drift...
The numbers actually support his opinion. 6 million bought the games, 20-60 million did not
Uncharted was teh flopNo, I am not actually be serious.
lol dude, come on.
His point was actually the same as yours, does that make your point irrelevant also?
I didn't see where you made the humor, not that i care that much, since you just quoted what I said with a follow up question and left it there. In return, I was compelled to reply with a logical statement, which, if you read the text, was not very "serious" at all but rather thorough. Apparently what i said must have rubbed you wrong since you were obliged to suddenly pass it off as "humor" when you could have easily done this ahead of time (original quote) to save both you and myself the drawed out explanation.
Do you see how much sense that makes?
The numbers actually support his opinion. 6 million bought the games, 20-60 million did not
No, I am not actually be serious.
lol dude, come on.
His point was actually the same as yours, does that make your point irrelevant also?
His point was based on the dark ages of the company and not currently or since the acquisition or the actual series, which obviously is where my point was directed. Instead, a single line was omitted from that passage and completely dissected and molded into ones own meaning. Because of this, I thought it was flawed and thus i gave a logical reasoning as to why that was. Its nothing personal, but rather a relevant point to take into consideration. Its a hell of a lot better than throwing random questions out in the wild hoping to get the punchline across, I think.
Now, before you ask, because the original statement was made to myself regarding the current state, there really wasn't a need to go into any great explanation regarding the context in that message. Now, had I been asked about the conditions at which that statement applied, THEN I could have given an more elaborate description. Since that was never asked, why bother?
Its easier to assume than there is to ask.
I didn't see where you made the humor, not that i care that much, since you just quoted what I said with a follow up question and left it there. In return, I was compelled to reply with a logical statement, which, if you read the text, was not very "serious" at all but rather thorough. Apparently what i said must have rubbed you wrong since you were obliged to suddenly pass it off as "humor" when you could have easily done this ahead of time (original quote) to save both you and myself the drawed out explanation.
Do you see how much sense that makes?
Why do you think I picked Way of the Warrior out of all of ND's games? Because I was serious? No. I'm a huge ND fan.
I guess I won't joke around with you anymore.
I thought Mr. Spock died?
Last edited:
I have no idea, Dno. I can't read your mind, and you certainly didn't leave much to go off of, and since I don't know you like that, i think its fair to say that I didn't know how serious you were. To me, it seems you had a question leading up to ND's track record, and with not much hinting to a punchline, that's how I took it.
In the future, you might want to use a sarcastic tag and/or be a little more thorough with your punchline rather than assuming that it was delivered effectively based on a vague message that way there is no confusion on anyones part.
I have no idea, Dno. I can't read your mind, and you certainly didn't leave much to go off of, and since I don't know you like that, i think its fair to say that I didn't know how serious you were. To me, it seems you had a question leading up to ND's track record, and with not much hinting to a punchline, that's how I took it.
In the future, you might want to use a sarcastic tag and/or be a little more thorough with your punchline rather than assuming that it was delivered effectively based on a vague message that way there is no confusion on anyones part.
I'm pretty sure you're the only one that took it as anything other than a joke.
But you're right. I could have used an emoticon for the super defensive.
or at least that's what you assumed once again........on both accounts. But I guess a start is better than none. No need to take it personal. It was a mere suggestion.
or at least that's what you assumed once again........on both accounts. But I guess a start is better than none. No need to take it personal. It was a mere suggestion.
Nah, I don't take any of this personally or serious at all.
Maybe you'll understand my personality eventually.
Itt: Posters who hate Sony and PS4 spreading BS and FUD about PS4's game lineup. Calling the Ratchet & Clank AAA game a "port", denying PS4's upcoming games exist, and insulting anyone who corrects their trolling with "Oh he's got a grip, white knuckled on Sony..."
Good thing the Xbox subforum is never s***posted like this.
Good thing the Xbox subforum is never s***posted like this.
Last edited:
It'll be out Q1 2016.
"Uncharted 4: A Thief's End will release before April 2016, Sony Computer Entertainment has confirmed.
"During its annual Investor Relations Day conference, PlayStation president Andrew House revealed that Naughty Dog's upcoming action-adventure game will be out before the company's 2015 fiscal year comes to a close, which ends March 31, 2016."
http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/05/28/uncharted-4-a-thiefs-end-release-window-revealed
"Uncharted 4: A Thief's End will release before April 2016, Sony Computer Entertainment has confirmed.
"During its annual Investor Relations Day conference, PlayStation president Andrew House revealed that Naughty Dog's upcoming action-adventure game will be out before the company's 2015 fiscal year comes to a close, which ends March 31, 2016."
http://www.ign.com/articles/2015/05/28/uncharted-4-a-thiefs-end-release-window-revealed
Like I said to those that doubted them (you know who are), give it time.
With enough time, Naughty Dog can do a lot of damage with their talent.
With enough time, Naughty Dog can do a lot of damage with their talent.
It surely looks fun, but no one made ND claim a 2015 release date, they did that themselves. Sure the game is no doubt better because of the delay, but there is no excuse for the delay. As E3 now shows, the rest of retail 2015 is empty now on the AAA front.
Ooooh, you mean by a few months which we have not yet fallen over into.
Excuses, excuses, excuses....
Naughty STILL have the rest of the year to go, not including the first quarter of next year, and look at where they are right now. 'Give it time' is what I told you and many others in this very thread. But unfortunately, tunnel vision is what blinds you just like Flynn. Convincing anyone at this magnitude is pointless. Its best to let them see it when the writing is on the wall, and it is THEN where i will call you out.
What? They've had plenty of time. Its not like sony has some stellar lineup this fall to carry the torch since UC4 was delayed, that's the point, but I guess it flew over your head.
Who is surprised a game is better by being delayed? lol, makes no sense you claim some sort of victory from that, guess what, the sky is blue!
The gameplay they showed off tonight was jaw dropping. The graphics are one thing, but the main thing that I found amazing was the set pieces and how everything flowed together so well. I don't know how people think this stuff up, but it's amazing.
Idk what you are saying, I haven't made any excuses. Enjoy talking about games that aren't coming this year.