I think that the original idea was to have him be the young ver. of Nathan Drake, but this movie has been in production limbo so long, he's getting closer to the appropriate age now, yet weirdly in the middle in age, and imo, still WAY off. Maybe when Holland ages a little more... but then how would they know that?Such strange casting decision.
Holland will look 14 until he starts decomposing in his grave at the age of 83 (if drugs and/or alcohol doesn't take him first).I think that the original idea was to have him be the young ver. of Nathan Drake, but this movie has been in production limbo so long, he's getting closer to the appropriate age now, yet weirdly in the middle in age, and imo, still WAY off. Maybe when Holland ages a little more... but then how would they know that?
This movie has had more directors quit than anything else I've ever heard about. It will be a bona-fide miracle if the end product is watchable.
Holland will look 14 until he starts decomposing in his grave at the age of 83 (if drugs and/or alcohol doesn't take him first).
Just a really bad casting decision imo, he doesn't even feel like a semi young Nathan Drake, he's too boyish.
Sure. Gene Hackman (too old now) would've been cool. How about William Hurt?*cough*tomhanksforsully*cough*
Best Sully by far would have been JK Simmons