11-14 cops shot 4 confirmed dead

morfeeis

The Big Bad Wolf
BANNED!
Sep 11, 2013
2,132
227
1,139
Your moms room
Don't have a link yet, was listening to the radio and heard it. Not happy about random acts of violence and it sucks for the cops family's. That said, this took way longer than i thought and I'd expect to see more shootings like this in the future.

A group of people can't feel as though jystice doesn't apply to them and not act out. There have been way to many blackmen gunned down by police over some sketchy crap...
 
An eye for an eye and the whole world goes blind :sad:. I'd rather see cops prosecuted than killed.
 
These cops rarely get prosecuted though. Not that I agree with this, if it is connected to the other shootings.

I'm just sad.

Yeah, far too often they go unpunished but he is right, I'm sure we all agree that randomly killing police isn't going to help change anything. One thing I generally don't do is base my thoughts on cell phone videos that start half way through a confrontation but it's hard to see how either of the last two shootings can be considered justified at all. That video of Alton Sterling lying there dying (second video that was released I believe) is hard to stomach. Watching a persons light go out (may sound corny but I believe an accurate description) just feels wrong, it just seems like something we shouldn't be watching and clearly shouldn't have been happening.
 
And N.W.A lyrics are just as relevant today as they were back in the 80's.

4c2ca07d48960cf5d9542d8a1b9e3907bce987b23e59c19cdb6d4ccd6e05e239.jpg
 
Don't think it was protestors. Maybe extremists that took BLM to the next level(or not even affiliated at all), but definitely not the protestors that were there. Protest was over from what I have read and people were disbursing.

Seems like it was very coordinated. The footage of the guy that lays suppressing fire and comes around the column behind the police officer. Def looked like he had some training, maybe ex-military.
 
Don't think it was protestors. Maybe extremists that took BLM to the next level(or not even affiliated at all), but definitely not the protestors that were there. Protest was over from what I have read and people were disbursing.

Seems like it was very coordinated. The footage of the guy that lays suppressing fire and comes around the column behind the police officer. Def looked like he had some training, maybe ex-military.

I have to agree, the more info that comes out the more this looks like a well trained group. Wonder if this is another terrorist attack?

That or retired armed forces or police.
 
Since no names have been released, I am going to just guess that they have Muslim sounding names...
 
Dallas police said no connection to terrorism.
It is terrorism, just different kind of ideology & political agenda.

Base on Wiki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_terrorism
  • It is the use of violence or threat of violence in order to purport a political, religious, or ideological change.
  • It can only be committed by non-state actors or undercover personnel serving on behalf of their respective governments.
  • It reaches more than the immediate target victims and is also directed at targets consisting of a larger spectrum of society.
  • It is a group that believes that an attack against civilians is an acceptable consequence because it is in order to achieve its greater goal of achieving societal change
At least point 1 is true, & point 3 is partically maybe.
 
Another tragic consequence of the continued devaluation of human life. Find these f***ers and bring them to justice.
 
I heard this morning that they sent in a robot and used the robot to detonate one of the shooters own explosives to kill him when they thought it was going to be impossible to get him out without risking losing more police lives.
 
It is terrorism, just different kind of ideology & political agenda.

Base on Wiki

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Definitions_of_terrorism
  • It is the use of violence or threat of violence in order to purport a political, religious, or ideological change.
  • It can only be committed by non-state actors or undercover personnel serving on behalf of their respective governments.
  • It reaches more than the immediate target victims and is also directed at targets consisting of a larger spectrum of society.
  • It is a group that believes that an attack against civilians is an acceptable consequence because it is in order to achieve its greater goal of achieving societal change
At least point 1 is true, & point 3 is partically maybe.
Correct. I omitted Islamic.
 
Well, that didn't take long....not even 24 hours, and already its Obama's fault.
 
Cops kill blacks and whites. But the more staggering fact is that "about 92 percent of blacks who were murdered were killed by other blacks..."

The energy, time, and rhetoric used to protest cops and whites are misdirected, irresponsible, and dangerous.

Difference is, when blacks kill blacks, they're punished if caught. When cops kill blacks...nothing is done. THAT is what they're upset over. The issue isn't "who" is killing blacks, but rather, the lack of justice when it's done.
 
Difference is, when blacks kill blacks, they're punished if caught. When cops kill blacks...nothing is done. THAT is what they're upset over. The issue isn't "who" is killing blacks, but rather, the lack of justice when it's done.

Interesting.

Prevailing in the criminal prosecution of cops is very difficult, which is part of the reason why they're rarely prosecuted. For example, even the DOJ under the Obama administration stated that its "federal investigation into the fatal shooting of Michael Brown does not support federal civil rights charges against Ferguson Police Officer Darren Wilson." However, I am curious to see statistics of criminal prosecutions of cops who kill whites v. cops who kill blacks.

One of the remedies available to relatives and victims of excessive force is through civil litigation. I have personally worked on cases where our clients received substantial sums for violations of their civil rights. Money doesn't replace a life, nor does it justify a wrong, but it is one remedy that the "justice system" affords victims and their families.
 
One of the remedies available to relatives and victims of excessive force is through civil litigation. I have personally worked on cases where our clients received substantial sums for violations of their civil rights. Money doesn't replace a life, nor does it justify a wrong, but it is one remedy that the "justice system" affords victims and their families.
I believe that.

Governments hand out money all the time. They just keep it on the down low and you rarely hear about it.

If a tree on crown land falls and damages your car or home, you can make a claim. Your car breaks an axle by hitting a huge pothole, you can make a claim. Doesn't mean you'll get it since their are rules, but there is a chance.

Improper imprisonment? You can get paid too.
 
Will have to see after 2017 election, if the witch is still in power.

If you like to refer to a winner of an election as "a witch in power" you'll fit right in pretty much anywhere in the South.
 
This is truly sad.

No one should have to fear this in their work day. I truly hope things get better.

Passing blame wont solve this issue, and I fear this will make things get worse, before they get better.
 
If you like to refer to a winner of an election as "a witch in power" you'll fit right in pretty much anywhere in the South.
You know I am talking about Merkel right?

And yes, she is a witch, ask all the girls getting sexually assaulted by her madness.
 
The problem is the people starting riots and this guy who shot those cops doesn't even care about the actual problem. He didn't do it because two black guys got killed. He did it because he's unstable and needed a reason to act out.

This world is headed to a very bad place. You want to end racism? Stop bringing it up like Al Sharpton. Might sound ridiculous, but if you keep talking about it and using it as an excuse every time something happens, guess what? It might just eventually go away.
 
Its call victim-hood indoctrination. Many were indoctrinated since young they are the victims, & the root of their problem is someone else. Can you imagine some African Americans still blame White folks for Slavery that happened over 150 years ago, committed by 4-6% of the population? We got it, slavery was bad, it was wrong, but using something that long ago to justified the victim-hood?

Groups like BLM make things worst by flaming this more, Blaming others mostly white for their problem, while completely ignored most homicide of blacks are by another black (over 90%), & more cops were killed by blacks the the other way around, & more whites were killed by cops than African Americans.

But victim-hood indoctrination always follow the same pattern. Project any signs that show the narrative of victim ( can be true, and be twisted, can be exaggerated) , while suppressing any evidence otherwise, while projecting a 'Bogeyman' as aggressor any way possible while suppressing any information that show otherwise.

This is nothing new, this type of indoctrination has been since civilization begin.
 
Last edited: