Yep. There are a number of games that score well that I don't get the hype for, and a lot of games with middling scores that I love. Fuk the reviewers. Days Gone looks good to me. I'd have it already if I wasn't angling for a 600 dollar kayak at the moment...Watch the DF video, they comment on UE4 having issues for games like this so it's not something I'm pulling out of my ass.
As far as games that Sony makes that I haven't liked? They've done a very good job over the last couple of years so out of the ones I've purchased I've liked most of them as far as I can remember. Going back I think KZ:SF was alright but not all that good, didn't care for Shadow of the colossus and never bothered finishing the last guardian because I got bored with it, same for Bloodborne and I think PSVR is a waste of time and money, does that make you happy? lol. I love how when you can't actually have a logical discussion you come up with garbage like that, it's classic Val.
BTW there are just as many no name sites giving it 5's and 6's as there are giving it 8's and 9's so your argument doesn't hold up, hell out of the 26 reviews that scored it under seven I've only heard of six of them.
It does look good but the texture streaming some seem to be having issues with is likely related to UE4. I play on a Pro so it's not much of an issue for me, not much more than it is in any other game.
One thing I will say is that this is a phenominal looking Unreal Engine 4 game, but I guess that is to be expected with 7 years time to develop and also being a AAA title and first party studio.
Yep. There are a number of games that score well that I don't get the hype for, and a lot of games with middling scores that I love. Fuk the reviewers. Days Gone looks good to me. I'd have it already if I wasn't angling for a 600 dollar kayak at the moment...
The dated PS4 has problems with UE4 but that's still not a excuse.Watch the DF video, they comment on UE4 having issues for games like this so it's not something I'm pulling out of my ass. Plus Decima is a proven engine for 3rd person open world games and they'd likely be able to get a lot of input from GG when they need help.
As far as games that Sony makes that I haven't liked? They've done a very good job over the last couple of years so out of the ones I've purchased I've liked most of them as far as I can remember. Going back I think KZ:SF was alright but not all that good, didn't care for Shadow of the colossus and never bothered finishing the last guardian because I got bored with it, same for Bloodborne and I think PSVR is a waste of time and money, does that make you happy? lol. I love how when you can't actually have a logical discussion you come up with garbage like that, it's classic Val.
BTW there are just as many no name sites giving it 5's and 6's as there are giving it 8's and 9's so your argument doesn't hold up, hell out of the 26 reviews that scored it under seven I've only heard of six of them.
My go to is:The dated PS4 has problems with UE4 but that's still not a excuse.
Actually the less known sites are the ones who rated it high like i said.
More trust worthy sites like gamepot(5/10) and egm(5.5/10) rated it badddd.
Even the site that is know for overating games ign gave it a measly 6.5/10.
They didn't like it either.
They didn't like it either.
For the 3rd time the no name sites skewed the review with 9's the more reputable sites gave it 5-6.5 and eurogamer don't like it but we don't have a score from them.When a review starts with "When I first heard about it I wondered about it's reason for existing" it doesn't sound like that person was really willing to give it a fair shot..
As I said there are just as many no name sites scoring the game low as there are no name sites that were giving it extremely high scores so again your "argument" doesn't hold up at all, you can keep repeating your same flawed argument all you want but it just doesn't hold up. You keep coming in here to trash the game and the people who like it, why is that? You said you weren't going to buy it so why bother coming in at all? I'm not saying you can't, it's not my place to do that but I would think you'd have better things to do than come in and seemingly try to "celebrate" something you aren't even right about to begin with.
Resetera is full swing sdf for this game.From the impressions I've been reading, most people seem to be enjoying it. Sounds more like a 7.5 to 8.0 type game than a 7.2 game, although I guess that's getting overly focused on decimals. Scores might be somewhat depressed by reviewers who played it without the 1.4 patch. (Bug fix patch 1.05 just came out, btw, from what I heard.) The SJW/PC tilt of the gaming press might have depressed the scores as well, although that's hard to know, since that sort of bias operates unconsciously. Wouldn't be surprised, though. It also seems to me that a lot of people made up their mind on the game early on, so I think there was a kind of confirmation bias or self-fulfilling prophecy effect operating; they went in expecting it to be a s***ty rehash, and that's what they found. That happens with other games, too, of course. People went into RDR2 expecting a masterpiece, so that's what they found. Only in retrospect did we discover that the game had a lot of problems, which the reviewers somehow overlooked in their rush to heap praise on it. I think the opposite happened here. It probably happened to some degree with Crackdown, too. A perception sets in, and it really influences how people experience things. One more factor is the rush to get reviews finished. Everyone scrambles to finish the game in time, so their review can hit the press on release day. I think that impacts the enjoyment of a game like this, which is probably best enjoyed slowly.
Anyhow, the impressions I've seen lead me to believe I'll enjoy it, when I get around to it eventually. It's obviously not god's gift to gaming, but it sounds decent.
For the 3rd time the no name sites skewed the review with 9's the more reputable sites gave it 5-6.5 and eurogamer don't like it but we don't have a score from them.
Average would be lower if not for the suspect 9's. Funny thing is a few of the supposed biased PlayStation sites trashed it.
Nobody is being trashed...only person i am in here addressing is you and the predictable defending which has no argument and much spin.
Sales data, first week UK (physical only):
"Sony's Days Gone comfortably beat Mortal Kombat 11 in the UK boxed games charts.
"Its launch week physical sales are 27% lower than last year's PS4 exclusive action adventure God of War. It is actually a decent performance when you consider this is a new IP - and the review scores for this new game have not been as impressive as last year's multi-award winning effort."
https://www.gamesindustry.biz/artic...s-gone-defeats-mortal-kombat-11-to-claim-no-1
Sounds pretty good, especially, as the writer says, for a new IP with average/mixed reviews. Hopefully the sales will continue and not drop off a cliff.
Here are other first-week UK sales of PS exclusives, for comparison:
Uncharted 4 - 192k (TUE)
Spider-Man - 190k (FRI)
Horizon Zero Dawn - 114k (WED)
God of War - 96k (FRI)
Uncharted The Lost Legacy - 80k (WED)
GT Sport - 74k (WED)
Days Gone - 70k (FRI)
inFamous Second Son - 70k (FRI)
Bloodborne - 43k (WED)
The Order 1886 - 39k (FRI)
Uncharted Nathan Drake Collection - 39k (WED)
Ratchet & Clank - 38k (FRI)
Detroit Become Human - 22k (FRI)
So, middle of the pack. Not as good as their huge hits, but as good or better than some games that have sold reasonably well. But we'll see how it plays out over time. My hope is that word of mouth will to some extent counter the doom and gloom around the review scores.
Nope it can't be said about the sites that rated it bad...well at least not EGM,GameSpot or EG(who didn't recommend it) to name a few.Except I wasn't defending it from anything other than your ignorant comments since you haven't even played it. Eurogamer from other regions did score it btw and it did well, the DF guys sounded like they enjoyed it when talking about it. You were the one calling the game a flop or bomb or some nonsense like that, you are the one that says no name sites are driving the score up when the exact same argument can be said for the ones giving it 5's. Bottom line is a game is only going to be as good as each individual playing it thinks it is, this game isn't a masterpiece but it's not trash either and I can say that because unlike you I have played it.
The fact that you were coming in here talking about how you didn't care about it (strange thing to do, take time to talk about something you don't care about) before it even launched meant you really had nothing to add to the discussion and makes me think you were only looking for people to take your bait to argue, that's something I won't do anymore in this thread. You are wrong, you can have your uninformed opinion all you want but I'm not going to bother paying it anymore attention.
I think the scores are a bit harsh, maybe because Sony have set the bar so high this gen.
WWZ a more complete game? This is a joke right?WWZ is a more complete game and lower priced
I skipped it due to it being a exclusive to Epic Game Store.
Sony guys will buy and defend this game.
Its happening in this thread and @era LOL