The 2016 United States Presidential Election Thread. v. 2

Status
Not open for further replies.
Do you know what vote fraud means? I don't think you do. Countless investigations into voter fraud over decades provided NOTHING. There's no such thing as voter fraud. It's a myth. Five cases over decades? Please.

What you're claiming the DNC did isn't voter fraud. You think it is, but it's not.
As always you fail to follow the conversation. Can you point out to me where I said Hillary Clinton will commit voter fraud. You brought that up not I, so you're jumping the gun yet again and you're also wrong again.
 
Can you please show me where I said that? I'm not sure what it is about your binary thoughts as far as politics are concerned but it's kind of sad. Just because I understand that Hillary Clinton is an awful corrupt criminal doesn't mean I want Trump to win I'm not sure why that is above your level of comprehension but it's sad to watch.
There only two choices. Everybody knows this except a select few. You don't want Hillary in office then you want Trump in office. It's rather simple.

Trump is as corrupt, far worse for the little guy. He's s***ted on the little guy his entire life. He wants to go to war with everyone. He want to bomb random countries if they fly to close to out ships. You say parents should fear war if Hillary is in office? Have you listened to anything the unstable, ego maniac manic has said? If I have the nukes why can't I use them. We have to fear Hillary taking us into war? Please.
 
It has proven that the DNC and HRC cheated Sanders out of the primaries, so i don't think trump speculating that HRC might do the same here is out of line.

As always you fail to follow the conversation. Can you point out to me where I said Hillary Clinton will commit voter fraud. You brought that up not I, so you're jumping the gun yet again and you're also wrong again.

How could Bernie be cheated out of anything? People vote. That's how Hillary got the nomination. The people's vote gets the candidate in. What else could you possible mean other than fraud? What could Hillary 'cheat' Trump out of? He's getting absolutely destroyed in every poll imaginable.
 
How could Bernie be cheated out of anything? People vote. That's how Hillary got the nomination. The people's vote gets the candidate in. What else could you possible mean other than fraud? What could Hillary 'cheat' Trump out of? He's getting absolutely destroyed in every poll imaginable.
Thanks for proving my point, I find no mention of the word fraud: so as always you're wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong again.

Now how about we talk about the 12 million that Huma abedin admitted that Hillary Clinton took from Monaco. But you don't have a problem with their human rights records. How do you feel about them murdering homosexuals and women. How do you feel about their treatment of women, why did Hillary Clinton take 25 million dollars from countries who have huge human rights violations?

Why are you okay with a bought-and-paid-for politician?
 
There only two choices. Everybody knows this except a select few. You don't want Hillary in office then you want Trump in office. It's rather simple.

Trump is as corrupt, far worse for the little guy. He's s***ted on the little guy his entire life. He wants to go to war with everyone. He want to bomb random countries if they fly to close to out ships. You say parents should fear war if Hillary is in office? Have you listened to anything the unstable, ego maniac manic has said? If I have the nukes why can't I use them. We have to fear Hillary taking us into war? Please.
And this is where you and I differ, I believe that one should vote for the person that they feel best represents their ideas and beliefs. I could not and would not vote for her, nor could i ever vote for him. But i must admit watching the media lie, ficus on non stories and fail to report real HRC dirt has almost made me want to vote for the twit. I threw up and came back to my senses...
 
And this is where you and I differ, I believe that one should vote for the person that they feel best represents their ideas and beliefs. I could not and would not vote for her, nor could i ever vote for him. But i must admit watching the media lie, ficus on non stories and fail to report real HRC dirt has almost made me want to vote for the twit. I threw up and came back to my senses...
The Clintons have been in the news for 40 years. There's nothing we don't know about her. Failed argument.
 
Thanks for proving my point, I find no mention of the word fraud: so as always you're wrong, wrong, wrong, and wrong again.

Now how about we talk about the 12 million that Huma abedin admitted that Hillary Clinton took from Monaco. But you don't have a problem with their human rights records. How do you feel about them murdering homosexuals and women. How do you feel about their treatment of women, why did Hillary Clinton take 25 million dollars from countries who have huge human rights violations?

Why are you okay with a bought-and-paid-for politician?

Instead of deflecting, and not supporting your argument, how did Bernie get cheated out of anything when it's a persons vote that gets them in the election? How could Hillary cheat Trump out of anything when it's people votes that point the direction of delegates. Define "cheat." Support your argument.

When you can clarify your remarks then we can move on to other discussions. I don't think you can be sue you've yet to support any argument you've made on these forums.

I'm going to play gears of war so i can see what America will be like when Hillary's president.
 
Again what I will say is that Wikileaks has proven that Hillary lied, obstructed Justice, destroyed evidence, colluded, conspired, worked with the media to promote her propaganda, she did every underhanded dirty trick in the world to get as far as she has. If you are comfortable with such a person then so be it. I think this country is stupid enough to put that woman in office and will suffer for it. Better yet the poor will suffer for it when their children are fighting unnecessary Wars and paying off her ridiculous expansion in government spending given to her friends for decades to come.

All that WikiLeaks has proven is they are not who they said they were. They were non partisan pro transparency. He has shown his true colors now.
 
And this is where you and I differ, I believe that one should vote for the person that they feel best represents their ideas and beliefs. I could not and would not vote for her, nor could i ever vote for him. But i must admit watching the media lie, ficus on non stories and fail to report real HRC dirt has almost made me want to vote for the twit. I threw up and came back to my senses...

You must not like the idea of knowing what Aleppo is or being able to name any foreign leaders.
 
Donald Trump CAN smile! A charity roast on news stations right now. Only caught Killary's. Need to see trumps. List of ammo on both sides.
 
I would disagree on the concept that if she had done something illegal she would face charges. By any stretch clinton broke the law, destroyed evidence, obstructed justice and had any less equal animal done what she had they would be in jail...

Except, of course, that's not what happened. They archived the work-related emails in December 2014, well before a subpoena, and she instructed the management company that she did not need to keep emails on the server beyond 60 days. The technician responsible for this failed to change the retention policy and at some point late in March, acted on his own to delete the emails.

https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-01-of-04/view (see pages approx 17 - 19)

But again, here is a case where you have accused and convicted someone because you hate her, not because you know the evidence or care. The people who rely on to think for you are telling you that Hillary herself saw a subpoena, got out her trusty jug o' bleach, and started to personally cover up whatever right-wing jizz fantasy conspiracy that they're pretending she's hiding. You see, the thing is, prosecutors generally don't bring charges based on anything other than the probability of being able to get a conviction, and while the narrative Trump and his Breitbart/Sputnik media sources are parroting would actually have led to that, the simple fact is that based on the evidence the FBI has, there is no reasonable probability of getting a conviction or probably even an indictment based on the facts.

Now, the thing is, if you would just focus on the fact that she was very irresponsible in how she handled her emails, I'd buy it. But that's never good enough - you have a hard-on for having her incarcerated and many other people who are in your cult think she should be shot, because they're being lied to and since it fits the hatred that's been bred in them for decades, they accept it without question. I wish I could say that you were better than that, and maybe you'll surprise me and read the report I linked and have the intellectual decency to recognize that if you change the name in the article to Trump, Bush, Rice, Powell, or Brutus the Buckeye, in every single case no charges would be filed and in every case I would agree with that and say the person was irresponsible for doing that.
 
You're either misinformed or willfully ignorant of what has happened.

You're right. Voter fraud exists, and scientifically shown to occur at a rate of nearly 50 illegal votes over the last billion cast.

Seriously, tell me how HRC or the DNC or anyone is going to get the Republican Governor and Republican Secretary of State (a Trump foundation Bribee!) to rig Florida for her, for example. The fact that dead people aren't purged off the rolls quickly enough is of course an issue that could be improved, but it's only fraudulent if someone attempts to actually vote for them. Almost all the cases of the supposed dead vote, minimal as it is, are people who filled out early ballots and then died before the actual election date, which is as much fraud as taking out a loan and then dying before the first payment was due.
 
And this is where you and I differ, I believe that one should vote for the person that they feel best represents their ideas and beliefs. I could not and would not vote for her, nor could i ever vote for him. But i must admit watching the media lie, ficus on non stories and fail to report real HRC dirt has almost made me want to vote for the twit. I threw up and came back to my senses...

And many Americans, thank the lord, differing from you, in believing that while voting based on ideals is neat, voting is also based on who they believe will do the better job.
Ideals aside, most Americans believe Hillary, regardless of how they feel about her, would do a better job, while trump not only will do worse, but he'll also fan the fires of bigotry.

That is the point PV is trying to make. By you voting 3rd party, and mostly just attacking the better candidate over trump, you are kinda admitting, that while you don't like trump, you're ok with a trump candidacy over Hillary.

Yeah, I know...you probably won't admit it, but we know.
 
Except, of course, that's not what happened. They archived the work-related emails in December 2014, well before a subpoena, and she instructed the management company that she did not need to keep emails on the server beyond 60 days. The technician responsible for this failed to change the retention policy and at some point late in March, acted on his own to delete the emails.

https://vault.fbi.gov/hillary-r.-clinton/hillary-r.-clinton-part-01-of-04/view (see pages approx 17 - 19)

But again, here is a case where you have accused and convicted someone because you hate her, not because you know the evidence or care. The people who rely on to think for you are telling you that Hillary herself saw a subpoena, got out her trusty jug o' bleach, and started to personally cover up whatever right-wing jizz fantasy conspiracy that they're pretending she's hiding. You see, the thing is, prosecutors generally don't bring charges based on anything other than the probability of being able to get a conviction, and while the narrative Trump and his Breitbart/Sputnik media sources are parroting would actually have led to that, the simple fact is that based on the evidence the FBI has, there is no reasonable probability of getting a conviction or probably even an indictment based on the facts.

Now, the thing is, if you would just focus on the fact that she was very irresponsible in how she handled her emails, I'd buy it. But that's never good enough - you have a hard-on for having her incarcerated and many other people who are in your cult think she should be shot, because they're being lied to and since it fits the hatred that's been bred in them for decades, they accept it without question. I wish I could say that you were better than that, and maybe you'll surprise me and read the report I linked and have the intellectual decency to recognize that if you change the name in the article to Trump, Bush, Rice, Powell, or Brutus the Buckeye, in every single case no charges would be filed and in every case I would agree with that and say the person was irresponsible for doing that.


Hence why multiple republican led witch hunts end up going no where. Time and time again, she's been proven to have not committed any crime. It's just the hate in people's eyes that make them believe otherwise.


You should have included a gif of a mic being dropped with this post.
 
Trump's Monologue. He was actually humble... for a while.....

Pardon me joke was awesome. Hillary's largest crowd joke was awesome. His ambassador joke was good. His Hillary first time not getting paid to talk to corporations was great. Nasty woman/ Rosie joke wasn't as bad as people made it out to be. Networks working hard to get her elected was great. Michelle/Melina joke was a home run. Hillary confession jokes were good. Right after that he pivoted and went stupid with the corruption joke. It wasn't funny and absolutely derailed what was a good monologue. Anything after that could be funny was dead, but there wasn't. It's like he had other people write the jokes prior to that and then he wrote the jokes after that.

 
And many Americans, thank the lord, differing from you, in believing that while voting based on ideals is neat, voting is also based on who they believe will do the better job.
Ideals aside, most Americans believe Hillary, regardless of how they feel about her, would do a better job, while trump not only will do worse, but he'll also fan the fires of bigotry.

That is the point PV is trying to make. By you voting 3rd party, and mostly just attacking the better candidate over trump, you are kinda admitting, that while you don't like trump, you're ok with a trump candidacy over Hillary.

Yeah, I know...you probably won't admit it, but we know.

He probably still thinks Gary Johnson is going to be President
 
Hillary's Monologue. Trump was a good sport about it considering how thin he usually is. Lots of smiles, laughs and 'That was a good one.' Much different than he was when Obama ripped him.

Nasty, disgusting Giuliani's face at 7:22 = lolz. 10:32 and 10:53 = even massive lolz! Sour puss.

Maria Bartiromo..... my goodness.

 
:hehe:
Hillary's Monologue. Trump was a good sport about it considering how thin he usually is. Lots of smiles, laughs and 'That was a good one.' Much different than he was when Obama ripped him.

Nasty, disgusting Giuliani's face at 7:22 = lolz. 10:32 and 10:53 = even massive lolz! Sour puss.

Maria Bartiromo..... my goodness.

 


More proof that the DNC and HRC were working together to incite violence at Trump rallies. Too bad the sexist racist homophobic media won't cover what's happening to this poor innocent woman
 


More proof that the DNC and HRC were working together to incite violence at Trump rallies. Too bad the sexist racist homophobic media won't cover what's happening to this poor innocent woman

I thought Hillary didn't create jobs? She's hiring people left and right to yell at Trump rallies according to this video.

So, you're comfortable with Trump as our next president?
 
Why is it the people who complain about the biased media happen to like Project Veritas aka James O'Keefe who not only edits videos to distort events he is also been given money by the Trump Foundation.
 
Why is it the people who complain about the biased media happen to like Project Veritas aka James O'Keefe who not only edits videos to distort events he is also been given money by the Trump Foundation.

If you're leaning at a 45 degree angle, something else at the same degree of slant will look like it's perfectly straight. It takes looking for some foundational perspective other than where you are at to see the actual leans.
 
Why is it the people who complain about the biased media happen to like Project Veritas aka James O'Keefe who not only edits videos to distort events he is also been given money by the Trump Foundation.
Shhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhhh. Just let him wallow. I wanted to see how far he dug into this one.

Teh biaaaaseed.
 
I like how O'Keefe refuses to release the raw footage because in his words "you would see a different story."
 
Status
Not open for further replies.