The End of the World: A Political Thread. A New Hope coming soon!

Status
Not open for further replies.


I am so angry after watching that video.

Heartless c***s. Zero empathy/sympathy. These are the kind of people that I would walk away laughing if they ever needed my help.
 
“It suggests to me that the goal here is not expose a scandal, but the goal is to impugn the credibility of the relevant actors and to satisfy an existing narrative,” said Stephen Vladeck, a University of Texas law professor who specializes in national security issues.
 


I am so angry after watching that video.

Heartless c***s. Zero empathy/sympathy. These are the kind of people that I would walk away laughing if they ever needed my help.


Stupid me watched that thinking some of them were going to be turned around

If the world was fair they would have all got hit by a bus afterwards.

"Go back to your own country" This is her country you c***
 


I am so angry after watching that video.

Heartless c***s. Zero empathy/sympathy. These are the kind of people that I would walk away laughing if they ever needed my help.


Yeah I got angry watching it, those people can f*** off. It also pisses me off that there is an expiration date to qualify as a "dreamer" Anyone who was brought here as a child should qualify no matter how old they are, if you grew up here this is your home. I'm all for following the law but you have to have common sense when it comes to situations like this.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viktor
I honestly wish someone could explain to me how someone can hate someone else for seemingly no reason other than a technicality?

I know they cherry pick these people for Kimmel but lots of people feel this way.

I would not have the balls to stand there and tell a US serviceman that his wife needs to go home because of a rule that they followed just happened to expire.

Where do people get that much hate in their hearts? Honestly, why do they care?
 
I honestly wish someone could explain to me how someone can hate someone else for seemingly no reason other than a technicality?

I know they cherry pick these people for Kimmel but lots of people feel this way.

I would not have the balls to stand there and tell a US serviceman that his wife needs to go home because of a rule that they followed just happened to expire.

Where do people get that much hate in their hearts? Honestly, why do they care?



Zero Tolerance comes from a crazy fear of the 'Slippery Slope' or that its about granting exceptions. Basically, making the rule of law worthless or soon leading to amnesty for all.
 
A pathetic being. He just lies every single day

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/factcheck/trump-falsely-claims-most-watched-state-of-union/ar-BBIyn7C

Trump falsely claims most-watched State of Union

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump says the ratings for his first State of the Union address this week are "the highest number in history," but that is not true.

Nielsen reports that about 45.6 million tuned in to watch Trump Tuesday night. That's below viewership for President Barack Obama's first State of the Union, which was about 48 million, and Trump's own joint address to Congress last year.

It also trails the 46.8 million viewers who tuned into President Bill Clinton's first State of the Union speech, and the 51.7 million who watched President George W. Bush's 2002 address.

Trump falsely argued last year that his inauguration was the most well-attended one ever.​

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/fact...uring-his-first-state-of-the-union/ar-BBIwrQj
 
My mother in law was raving on Facebook how amazing the address was. It's like she, and the rest of my wife's family, don't think a president would not lie, or, just for once, not know what the f*** is coming out of his own mouth.
 
A pathetic being. He just lies every single day

https://www.msn.com/en-us/news/factcheck/trump-falsely-claims-most-watched-state-of-union/ar-BBIyn7C
Trump falsely claims most-watched State of Union

WASHINGTON — President Donald Trump says the ratings for his first State of the Union address this week are "the highest number in history," but that is not true.

Nielsen reports that about 45.6 million tuned in to watch Trump Tuesday night. That's below viewership for President Barack Obama's first State of the Union, which was about 48 million, and Trump's own joint address to Congress last year.

It also trails the 46.8 million viewers who tuned into President Bill Clinton's first State of the Union speech, and the 51.7 million who watched President George W. Bush's 2002 address.

Trump falsely argued last year that his inauguration was the most well-attended one ever.​

 
The memo is out

IpDAgCi.gif
 
The democrats were afraid of this? This memo is so boring, and nothing, and everything we already knew. WTF? This is so non-news unless I missed something in it?
 
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ), Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, released the following statement on partisan attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice:

“In 2016, the Russian government engaged in an elaborate plot to interfere in an American election and undermine our democracy. Russia employed the same tactics it has used to influence elections around the world, from France and Germany to Ukraine, Montenegro, and beyond. Putin’s regime launched cyberattacks and spread disinformation with the goal of sowing chaos and weakening faith in our institutions. And while we have no evidence that these efforts affected the outcome of our election, I fear they succeeded in fueling political discord and dividing us from one another.

“The latest attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice serve no American interests – no party’s, no president’s, only Putin’s. The American people deserve to know all of the facts surrounding Russia’s ongoing efforts to subvert our democracy, which is why Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation must proceed unimpeded. Our nation’s elected officials, including the president, must stop looking at this investigation through the warped lens of politics and manufacturing partisan sideshows. If we continue to undermine our own rule of law, we are doing Putin’s job for him.”
 
  • Like
Reactions: Hazard71
Washington, D.C. – U.S. Senator John McCain (R-AZ), Chairman of the Senate Armed Services Committee, released the following statement on partisan attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice:

“In 2016, the Russian government engaged in an elaborate plot to interfere in an American election and undermine our democracy. Russia employed the same tactics it has used to influence elections around the world, from France and Germany to Ukraine, Montenegro, and beyond. Putin’s regime launched cyberattacks and spread disinformation with the goal of sowing chaos and weakening faith in our institutions. And while we have no evidence that these efforts affected the outcome of our election, I fear they succeeded in fueling political discord and dividing us from one another.

“The latest attacks on the FBI and Department of Justice serve no American interests – no party’s, no president’s, only Putin’s. The American people deserve to know all of the facts surrounding Russia’s ongoing efforts to subvert our democracy, which is why Special Counsel Mueller’s investigation must proceed unimpeded. Our nation’s elected officials, including the president, must stop looking at this investigation through the warped lens of politics and manufacturing partisan sideshows. If we continue to undermine our own rule of law, we are doing Putin’s job for him.”
f***ing John McCain!
 
So, like we can label Nunes, Gaetz, Johnson and any other GOP member in the gov’t that is actively trying to hinder this investigation as brown shirts at this point right?

If trump and his cronies have done nothing wrong, why try so hard to discredit the investigation? Makes you wonder what they are afraid of?

I assume a lot of people in the government, more likely a lot of GOP c***s, are probably on the Russian take also...
 
The democrats were afraid of this? This memo is so boring, and nothing, and everything we already knew. WTF? This is so non-news unless I missed something in it?

They could have released a memo that said literally only the words: "Godless Commie Liberals in the FBI want to make Trump look bad" and they'd eat it up as proof of a conspiracy against their Lord and Saviour Jesus H. Trump.
 
The Russian thing all comes back to Trump. Did Trump and Russia actually collude? Maybe. Maybe not. Either way, Trump can't take any criticism and sees it as an act of disloyalty, so he starts doing what he does - fire back. In Trump's world, that's normal, but as President, that's obstruction of justice.

Even if the investigation comes back and finds nothing, it is still on Trump for obstructing justice. Had Trump just cooperated and not fired Comey, this scandal would be over and we'd be back onto what cat he's grabbing or what porn star he's paying off...err allegedly paying off.
 
  • Like
Reactions: Viktor
or what porn star he's paying off...err allegedly paying off.

He was just thinking that she's a beautiful young lady, by the way, and that she really looks prettier with her mouth closed and so contributed some money to her so she could keep her mouth closed. #DrumpfLogic
 
  • The State Department declined to comment on the specifics of visa cases and referred further questions to the Russian Embassy.
Um... What? That doesn't sound suspicious at all.

This whole thing is screwed up. Three Russian spies who have been banned from the US just walk in and talk to the CIA?
 
Last edited:
  • Like
Reactions: Viktor
Status
Not open for further replies.