The End of the World: A Political Thread. A New Hope coming soon!
- Thread starter Plainview
- Start date
- Status
Sheriff Who Once Endorsed Roy Moore Accused Of Having Sex With Underage Girls
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...b4f6279e4b0de86f488eb64?utm_source=reddit.com
Yep
https://www.huffingtonpost.com/entr...b4f6279e4b0de86f488eb64?utm_source=reddit.com
Yep
A reporter says to Trump all our intelligence agencies believe there is collusion from Russia, so what do you believe?
And will you say to Putin right now do that interfere again?
Obviously this is a loaded "question" as it's really just the reporter saying Russia hacked us 100% and will you confront Putin right now.
Trump answers: I want to know where the DNC server is. I want to know where all of Hilary's emails are.
So I have great confidence in my intelligence people but President Putin was extremely strong and powerful in his denial today and he has made the offer to work together have our people working on the case work with his people in regards to this.
....what did you expect him to do? Punch Putin int he face on live TV? Do you actually think Obama or Hillary would have been any "tougher"?
The entire press conference was very sensible....even a tad boring. The epic meltdown by all of you is from the last 5 minutes of it and I think it's hilarious. He "threw" the intelligence community under the bus? By saying what? That he has great confidence in said intelligence community but Putin is very much denying the allegations so we need to work together and hopefully get to the truth? Realistically what other response could he have given? "
Yes I do think Putin hacked the election, I'm on his payroll (even tho I'm a billionaire), and Russia is the reason I won the election."
lol k
In response to the backlash towards Zuckerberg and Facebook about why they claim they're combating the real fake news and propaganda they willingly allowed Facebook and their refusal to ban Info Wars, Zuckerberg had the below to say. He doesn't think Info Wars "Intentionally gets it wrong"? I'm sure they don't intentionally to call children crisis actors anytime there's a shooting. I'm sure they don't intentionally mean to say liberals are starting a new civil war on the 4th of July. Nope, not intentional. Eat a dick Zuckerberg.
https://money.cnn.com/2018/07/18/technology/zuckerberg-recode-holocaust/index.html
https://money.cnn.com/2018/07/18/technology/zuckerberg-recode-holocaust/index.html
"At the end of the day, I don't believe that our platform should take that down because I think there are things that different people get wrong," Zuckerberg told Swisher. "I don't think that they're intentionally getting it wrong."
He went on to compare conspiracy theories to people who simply misspeak.
"It's hard to impugn intent and to understand the intent. I just think, as abhorrent as some of those examples are, I think the reality is also that I get things wrong when I speak publicly," he said prophetically.
Infowars is absolute crap for sure. Even their name tells what they are - basically using misinformation as a weapon.
As much as I hate the right wing propaganda machine, I don't think we win fighting it with censorship. I think you combat fake news with real news. You let the fake news and the real news come through. I think there's a benefit to having conservatives see more of Infowars. I think they live in their little information bubble and don't see just how batsh** crazy the people they side with really are. I know my very conservative family doesn't see Infowars or even Breitbart.
As much as I hate the right wing propaganda machine, I don't think we win fighting it with censorship. I think you combat fake news with real news. You let the fake news and the real news come through. I think there's a benefit to having conservatives see more of Infowars. I think they live in their little information bubble and don't see just how batsh** crazy the people they side with really are. I know my very conservative family doesn't see Infowars or even Breitbart.
I agree with that, but it's hypocritical in what they're claiming they're attempting to do.
She called it to a t. And here we are, nearly two years later, same s***. Mind numbing.
TRUMP: Now we can talk about Putin. I don't know Putin. He said nice things about me. If we got along well, that would be good. If Russia and the United States got along well and went after ISIS, that would be good.
He has no respect for her. He has no respect for our president. And I'll tell you what: We're in very serious trouble, because we have a country with tremendous numbers of nuclear warheads -- 1,800, by the way -- where they expanded and we didn't, 1,800 nuclear warheads. And she's playing chicken. Look, Putin...
WALLACE: Wait, but...
TRUMP: ... from everything I see, has no respect for this person.
CLINTON: Well, that's because he'd rather have a puppet as president of the United States.
TRUMP: No puppet. No puppet.
CLINTON: And it's pretty clear...
TRUMP: You're the puppet!
CLINTON: It's pretty clear you won't admit...
TRUMP: No, you're the puppet.
CLINTON: ... that the Russians have engaged in cyberattacks against the United States of America, that you encouraged espionage against our people, that you are willing to spout the Putin line, sign up for his wish list, break up NATO, do whatever he wants to do, and that you continue to get help from him, because he has a very clear favorite in this race.
So I think that this is such an unprecedented situation. We've never had a foreign government trying to interfere in our election. We have 17 -- 17 intelligence agencies, civilian and military, who have all concluded that these espionage attacks, these cyberattacks, come from the highest levels of the Kremlin and they are designed to influence our election. I find that deeply disturbing.
WALLACE: Secretary Clinton...
CLINTON: And I think it's time you take a stand...
TRUMP: She has no idea whether it's Russia, China, or anybody else.
CLINTON: I am not quoting myself.
TRUMP: She has no idea.
CLINTON: I am quoting 17...
TRUMP: Hillary, you have no idea.
CLINTON: ... 17 intelligence -- do you doubt 17 military and civilian...
TRUMP: And our country has no idea.
CLINTON: ... agencies.
TRUMP: Yeah, I doubt it. I doubt it.
CLINTON: Well, he'd rather believe Vladimir Putin than the military and civilian intelligence professionals who are sworn to protect us.
Just a remind for those that weren't on WeCraveGames, but Dread would have voted for Trump but didn't because, correct me if I'm wrong, you forgot what day the election was so you weren't around to actually vote? It was something like that anyways. Also keep in mine Dread gets 99% of his "news" from Fox News, Breitbart, InfoWars, etc.
So to answer your questions, which might be a little off since you're sentence structure is atrocious. Anyways, I fail to see how that question by the reporter is "loaded." All Trump has to do in this case is side with his own agencies, his own country. But he can't. He has to whatabout back Clinton and the servers, which he does time and time again.
Second, he might claim he has great confidence but he continually sides with Putin or flip flops on what he believes. Who gives a s*** what Putin claims. f*** Putin. Yea he should have punched Putin the face
. This meeting shouldn't have happened in the first place, especially the closed doors meeting we have no idea what was said. Would Obama or Clinton be tougher? Well I can't say for sure on Clinton, but we have already seen where yes in fact, Obama was tougher. Remember the sanctions he put in place prior to Trump? Trump can claim he has been the toughest on Russia but it's just more lies. Those sanctions were something Obama put in place and Trump has, reluctantly, kept in place.Finally, as I and many others have said, this meeting should not have happened in the first place. Just after the NATO summit and Trump continuing to crap on our allies, he goes right into a secret meeting with yet another authoritarian that he loves so much. He continues to question the intelligence communities, all of the indictments that have come from the Mueller probe, and now we see that as early as January 2017, he had knowledge and proof that Putin had ordered the hacking. This president continues to side with a foreign government over his own country. So what you might claim is an "epic meltdown". is normal patriotic Americans seeing our president being compromised.
As for your last quote, I assume you're being factitious. One of Trump's r******d children already stated they get a lot of their funding from Russian banks, so while he might not be on Putin's direct payroll, who do you think controls the banks in Russia?
I'm surprised you generated a response. There was no response to the insanity I could muster other than "lol k."Just a remind for those that weren't on WeCraveGames, but Dread would have voted for Trump but didn't because, correct me if I'm wrong, you forgot what day the election was so you weren't around to actually vote? It was something like that anyways. Also keep in mine Dread gets 99% of his "news" from Fox News, Breitbart, InfoWars, etc.
So to answer your questions, which might be a little off since you're sentence structure is atrocious. Anyways, I fail to see how that question by the reporter is "loaded." All Trump has to do in this case is side with his own agencies, his own country. But he can't. He has to whatabout back Clinton and the servers, which he does time and time again.
Second, he might claim he has great confidence but he continually sides with Putin or flip flops on what he believes. Who gives a s*** what Putin claims. f*** Putin. Yea he should have punched Putin the face
Finally, as I and many others have said, this meeting should not have happened in the first place. Just after the NATO summit and Trump continuing to crap on our allies, he goes right into a secret meeting with yet another authoritarian that he loves so much. He continues to question the intelligence communities, all of the indictments that have come from the Mueller probe, and now we see that as early as January 2017, he had knowledge and proof that Putin had ordered the hacking. This president continues to side with a foreign government over his own country. So what you might claim is an "epic meltdown". is normal patriotic Americans seeing our president being compromised.
As for your last quote, I assume you're being factitious. One of Trump's r******d children already stated they get a lot of their funding from Russian banks, so while he might not be on Putin's direct payroll, who do you think controls the banks in Russia?
A GREAT read about Browder and the Magintsky Act straight from the mouth of Browder.
http://time.com/5340545/bill-browder-vladimir-putin-magnitsky-act-donald-trump/
http://time.com/5340545/bill-browder-vladimir-putin-magnitsky-act-donald-trump/
I usually avoided him on WCG but figured if he was going to venture into this thread I'd respond at least once. Just know, like all other Trump supporters on this forum, he will just hit and run with meme's or garbage posts.
I think him not saying anything while Putin was there would be totally fine if he was even remotely tough on Russia at any point in the past 18 months. Of course the idea that him being there had anything to do with it gets shot out the window when he comes home and claims he just misspoke.
Work together to find the truth
That is like the LAPD working with OJ to find the real killers
Work together to find the truth
That is like the LAPD working with OJ to find the real killers
People who voted for Trump try very hard to muddy the waters and "normalize" this mess which is anything but.
Trump got asked a very simple and straightforward question about Russian meddling in the election and he's given all sorts of contradictory answers. Why are these very simple questions so challenging for him to answer? Trump is direct to the point of being blunt on every single thing... except this thing. He's been vague on Russia since day 1. He says that it was a "Democrat excuse". He says "Putin says he didn't do it", then he reverses that. Then he goes golfing and gets his raccoon tan done.
We don't have all the facts yet from Mueller, but we know Trump has blatantly lied many, many times. What's more, we know that no matter how many times he lies, some people will jump to defend him anyway. I think deep down they don't want to admit that they got conned by an old fashioned "snake oil" salesman.
How can you talk "politics" about this when the guy just lies and lies and lies? Trump isn't conservative or Republican, he's just a loud mouthed salesman who jumped on the alt right Breitbart train and conned a bunch of angry white people to vote for him. Tariffs and trade wars? Coal jobs? He isn't bringing blue collar jobs back, he's selling you a line of BS.
Trump got asked a very simple and straightforward question about Russian meddling in the election and he's given all sorts of contradictory answers. Why are these very simple questions so challenging for him to answer? Trump is direct to the point of being blunt on every single thing... except this thing. He's been vague on Russia since day 1. He says that it was a "Democrat excuse". He says "Putin says he didn't do it", then he reverses that. Then he goes golfing and gets his raccoon tan done.
We don't have all the facts yet from Mueller, but we know Trump has blatantly lied many, many times. What's more, we know that no matter how many times he lies, some people will jump to defend him anyway. I think deep down they don't want to admit that they got conned by an old fashioned "snake oil" salesman.
How can you talk "politics" about this when the guy just lies and lies and lies? Trump isn't conservative or Republican, he's just a loud mouthed salesman who jumped on the alt right Breitbart train and conned a bunch of angry white people to vote for him. Tariffs and trade wars? Coal jobs? He isn't bringing blue collar jobs back, he's selling you a line of BS.
So what do you propose
So what do you propose? Never meet with Putin....ever? Not until we have a Democrat for president?
We know China did some hacking too......you gonna boycott Chinese goods? We done speaking to Jinping?
Are you really not open to even the possibility that Putin himself didn't actually directly sanction the hack? It's a big deal that the DNC server got hacked and some damaging emails were released but it's so CRAZY to me that they've been screaming RUSSIANS!!!!! since the beginning as if this in the early 1980's. Did you read the responses from the conference? The GOP absolutely trashed the president and at the same time reminded everyone that Russia is the enemy and there is no moral equivalence to that nation and our own.
Lotta nasty countries out there with human rights violations out the ass but it seems to be the opinion of this country at the moment that our "enemy" is Russia. Sorry but I think it's absurd and hilarious.
Just a remind for those that weren't on WeCraveGames, but Dread would have voted for Trump but didn't because, correct me if I'm wrong, you forgot what day the election was so you weren't around to actually vote? It was something like that anyways. Also keep in mine Dread gets 99% of his "news" from Fox News, Breitbart, InfoWars, etc.
So to answer your questions, which might be a little off since you're sentence structure is atrocious. Anyways, I fail to see how that question by the reporter is "loaded." All Trump has to do in this case is side with his own agencies, his own country. But he can't. He has to whatabout back Clinton and the servers, which he does time and time again.
Second, he might claim he has great confidence but he continually sides with Putin or flip flops on what he believes. Who gives a s*** what Putin claims. f*** Putin. Yea he should have punched Putin the face
Finally, as I and many others have said, this meeting should not have happened in the first place. Just after the NATO summit and Trump continuing to crap on our allies, he goes right into a secret meeting with yet another authoritarian that he loves so much. He continues to question the intelligence communities, all of the indictments that have come from the Mueller probe, and now we see that as early as January 2017, he had knowledge and proof that Putin had ordered the hacking. This president continues to side with a foreign government over his own country. So what you might claim is an "epic meltdown". is normal patriotic Americans seeing our president being compromised.
As for your last quote, I assume you're being factitious. One of Trump's r******d children already stated they get a lot of their funding from Russian banks, so while he might not be on Putin's direct payroll, who do you think controls the banks in Russia?
So what do you propose? Never meet with Putin....ever? Not until we have a Democrat for president?
We know China did some hacking too......you gonna boycott Chinese goods? We done speaking to Jinping?
Are you really not open to even the possibility that Putin himself didn't actually directly sanction the hack? It's a big deal that the DNC server got hacked and some damaging emails were released but it's so CRAZY to me that they've been screaming RUSSIANS!!!!! since the beginning as if this in the early 1980's. Did you read the responses from the conference? The GOP absolutely trashed the president and at the same time reminded everyone that Russia is the enemy and there is no moral equivalence to that nation and our own.
Lotta nasty countries out there with human rights violations out the ass but it seems to be the opinion of this country at the moment that our "enemy" is Russia. Sorry but I think it's absurd and hilarious.
According tucker carlson, Mexicans. Not joking. He said Mexico is a bigger threat than russia electorally. His reason, for the million times debunked claim of hundreds of thousands, and possibly as high as three million, illegal Mexican votes cast in the last "election."
Must be nice to just believe everything you are told:
Aside from the meme photo (I already said you were going to post), do you have a valid, verifiable source that Mueller was involved in the decision for the Iraq War? I did a quick search about Mueller and WMDs, and all I can find are sources that include RT, The_Donald, and some random sketchy websites and YouTube videos. I did find a C-Span video that the top picture I'm assuming was cropped from. At no point in the testimony in that video did he advocate for war. All he mentions is that he believes Iraq may provide these to terrorists, based on what what someone else told him.
https://www.c-span.org/video/?c4719428/mueller-testifies-iraqs-wmds
I don't think you are long for this thread.
I think it's alright to meet, but to do it behind closed doors and then have Trump backtrack everything he says, only to backtrack again and then say he did mean it is really really dumb. Couple that with the fact that Trump never imposed the sanctions that were universally passed by Congress veto-free, the fact that he won't say a bad thing about Putin, and the fact that he's trying to s*** on all of our allies and yeah I think there's reason to be upset about all of this.
Do I believe some of the Anti-Trump speech is spewed out because it gets ratings and such? Yes. I think it can be overkill a little bit, but when it comes down to the real problems you can't ignore the smoke. There's something very weird about his interactions with Putin, and the fact that he wants this investigation to be ended yesterday should definitely not be ignored.
Also I've missed you
Just as a simple start - how about when asked if he believes that Russia interfered with our election he gives a straight answer? Or even maybe, just maybe stop lying so much?
Some of his answers to this question include:
-Yes
-No
-Maybe
-Obama
-Hillary
Which lie is the one you want to stick with today Trump?
We're not going to war with Russia, we want a straight answer from our elected President.
No, I didn't expect him to punch Putin in the face but I didn't expect him to suck his d1ck either.
- Status