That's what happened to me once it said welcome to YouTube.Can't see it. I clicked the link and it took me to the gmail login page. I logged in and it lead me to my profile.
this is what I dislike. Was God truly speaking through the writers of the edited version of the bible that we have today? Most of these guys were persecuted exiled hermits during the time they wrote their passages.
why does their word ring more true than the crazy guy on the street corner?
I wouldn't trust the word of any god that couldn't defeat people in iron chariots. Do you think that would give Thor any problems?
No, a god was not speaking through the writers.
What's anyone's evidence for a god guiding anyone to write the bible?Where's your evidence for that assertion?
No.Do you believe in a God?
Human beings have an infinite capacity to rationalize that anything is right or that anything is wrong and both sides of an argument will use the Bible to prove they are right.
What's anyone's evidence for a god guiding anyone to write the bible?
God spoke to me yesterday. I'm going to write about it. Since I claim it to be true, it's true.
I can't watch a 2 hour video.
While partially true, it's false to assume that two opposing opinions can be equally backed Biblically, and that's the point of the video. Truth does exist. Relativism is provably and demonstrably false.
If you read through the Bible, it's very clear about the act of homosexual behaviors. It's black and white clear.
It's also black and white clear that if God does not exist, then there's no problem at all with homosexual behavior. We are just advanced primates, not unlike any other species of animal, and all other species engage in homosexual behaviors, so we are (therefore) no better or worse if we engage in such behaviors as well. Of course, if there is no God, then there's also no concept of morally "right" or morally "wrong" with any objective basis. Without God, it's no more "good" to love a child than it is to rape and molest that child. Without God, we're lost in a sea of social adaptations for morality, all relative, and none of which are "better" or "worse" than any other suite of morality... the difference between Mother Teresa and Adolf Hitler would be morally equivalent to the difference between green and blue - that is - nothing more than preference; not better, not worse, just different.
For people who aren't Christians, I get it - they don't believe in the full gamut, much less specific doctrines... and the Bible's also clear that we as Christians shouldn't point the finger and judge non-Christians, because they know not what they do... but for the Christians who now believe that homosexual behavior is God's best for some, they need to understand that the Bible is actually quite clear on the issue, and they're just mistaken. The Bible never condemns the homosexual individual, or the individual with a homosexual orientation. The Bible only condemns the behavior as an abomination... and why? Because there's a better way.
That's why I loved this video. It shows the heart behind the message.
What's anyone's evidence for a god guiding anyone to write the bible?
No.
God spoke to me yesterday. I'm going to write about it. Since I claim it to be true, it's true.
Its pointed out to be wrong by Paul in the new testament as well.
So is fornication and many other sins as everyone is guilty in need of the payment for sins that Jesus Christ paid with his blood.
This has been debated ad nauseum, I know, but if you don't believe in God then you have to believe you came from a rock, which came from nothing at all (or maybe multiple parallel universes that came from nothing at all?). It takes a much greater faith to think that something (not only material, but time!) can come from nothing at all, or that matter is eternal and exists on its own, or even that consciousness can spontaneously arise from a rock (that came from nothing at all) over time, than it does to believe in a consciousness that exists outside of the space and time we occupy. Can I appeal to your logic that this is a difficult end to accept? That you came from nothing, and you will end up as nothing, and every memory about your and your entire life will end up as nothing?
As far as His relative power, think of how powerful you would be if you created a 2D world but were a 3D being. Heck, if you put ANY consciousness outside of space and time, which we all know were both created (whether it be by the Big Bang, or by God, or both!), then you have God.
Now then the hope is that He actually loves you, otherwise you are just as screwed as if He did not exist at all. But the good news is He does love you man and wants the best for you.
lol,wut? There's plenty of nonsense in the bible. Just because man has found ways to "excuse" it away doesn't make it true. I can say I am god, and no one can disprove that. Does that make it true?The applicability and timelessness of the truths depicted in it is good evidence that it wasn't man written. The fact that in thousands of years, no one has been able to show a clear contradiction of truths that it teaches.
There is no evidence. For example, other than what is written in the bible...there is no "evidence" that Jesus walked on water. And the bible is filled with such claims that there is no evidence, other than what is written. Where is there evidence of "angels"? Or that Lucifer was exiled from Heaven?That said, I wouldn't blame someone for not taking that evidence as enough to persuade them... but that said, there's no strong evidence to the contrary either.
And no, I don't know. I also don't know that Zeus was real or not. Just because I can't bring strong evidence that Zeus did not exist, doesn't mean....he did.So at best, we're left with "we don't know". If you claim it's not inspired by God, you need to have good/strong evidence for such a claim - and you don't. So at best, you've only shown that "you don't know".
None of that is evidence of a god. I could easily spin it and say all this is evidence that earth was one big petri dish that aliens used for there experiments.It starts with evidence for a God. If there's reasonable evidence for God, and if our moral realities are to be believed (just as we believe our other senses, like smell, taste, sight, etc.) - then it follows that
Only because I told you I don't believe in god.This is fallacious for many reasons:
1. You don't believe in God, on your own admission. This is, therefore, far more plausibly an attempt to show irrationality in the claims of others, then it is to be a genuine experience.
2. Most individuals who make claims about hearing from God are not. You need multiple attestations for credibility.
3. If God spoke to you, it's uncharacteristic of one who heard from God to not even mention what God supposedly said. Therefore, likely a false claim.
Doesn't need to be. Your scriptures are not the only religions of man. You're failing to see the point. When I say "god", what makes you think I'm referring to the christian god? Point is, you CANNOT prove me wrong. A god spoke to me yesterday. I don't believe in your christian god, but this deity did speak to me. Prove. Me. Wrong.There are many other reasons I won't get into, but clearly, this is a false claim... and not at all parallel to the scriptures.
I follow the Gospel of the Flying Spaghetti Monster.
Cloudy with a Chance of Metballs is the FSM religion version of the Bible.As well you should....we cannot disprove the existence of FSM, therefore, he must exist.