He didn't write the review. What does he have to do with the review?Um, he's the reviews editor?
He didn't write the review. What does he have to do with the review?Um, he's the reviews editor?
He edits all reviews.He didn't write the review. What does he have to do with the review?
So you believe MS paid him to overrule the reviewer's opinion, that's shared by others outside of Polygon mind you, putting the site's entire reputation on the line, and risking losing everything, in order to have it written that the Xbox One version is preferred over the PS4 version. That's what you're saying?H
He edits all reviews.
So you believe MS paid him to overrule the reviewer's opinion, that's shared by others outside of Polygon mind you, putting the site's entire reputation on the line, and risking losing everything, in order to have it written that the Xbox One version is preferred over the PS4 version. That's what you're saying?
Of course it does, it's a straw man argument.When you type it out like that, it all sounds so ridiculous.
So you believe MS paid him to overrule the reviewer's opinion, that's shared by others outside of Polygon mind you, putting the site's entire reputation on the line, and risking losing everything, in order to have it written that the Xbox One version is preferred over the PS4 version. That's what you're saying?
looks the same and the guy said the brightness was turned up on the xbox version
What does Gies have to do with the review..he didn't write it lol.
So you're not agreeing with it because of what? IGN echoed the frame rate drops. Other reviews, as posted in this thread, have selected the Xbox One as the console of choice for CoD: Ghosts. And, you not agreeing with this review based on what? What basis are you using to disagree with the review?I'm not implying he took cash for this review but MS has paid him before.
In regards to COD:G on consoles altogether, none of these guys has shown me where the game dips and IGN has said the PS4 looks better and has the odd minor hiccup, very different than Polygon's comments about their imagination thinking it may have looked better on PS4, kinda loses credibility to say s*** like that imo.
Again, not saying he/Poly took money from MS, don't misunderstand, just not really agreeing with this review for COD:G.
they already took 700,000 dollars from MS i doubt they care about their reputation.So you believe MS paid him to overrule the reviewer's opinion, that's shared by others outside of Polygon mind you, putting the site's entire reputation on the line, and risking losing everything, in order to have it written that the Xbox One version is preferred over the PS4 version. That's what you're saying?
$700,000 is meaningless when you're talking about a website that makes substantial money and has a rather large, paid staff for a video game website.they already took 700,000 dollars from MS i doubt they care about their reputation.
So you're not agreeing with it because of what? IGN echoed the frame rate drops. Other reviews, as posted in this thread, have selected the Xbox One as the console of choice for CoD: Ghosts. And, you not agreeing with this review based on what? What basis are you using to disagree with the review?
And his $ from MS has nothing to do with this. Call upon that all you want. It's meaningless reaching and is nothing more than an attempt to discredit a review because people don't agree with it.
And what does that tell you? Neither one is head or shoulders above the other and the resolution difference is rendered meaningless all things considered, or at the every least, not as big of an issue as others have made it out to be last week. Get it for whatever system you're getting and don't base a console purchase on what seems to be a massively dated engine that isn't friendly to neither next gen console.IGN also said PS4 is the choice to go for if graphical fidelity is important to you and indicated that the FPS were minor hiccups that won't disrupt the gameplay.
I don't know yet. Still a lot of mixed reviews coming in for both versions. Just buy the one on your preferred console of choice, once again.
What's this from?
700,000 means nothing now, but i doubt they had the money to start up polygon without the 700,00$700,000 is meaningless when you're talking about a website that makes substantial money and has a rather large, paid staff for a video game website.
How come it looks like the Xbox One has this brightness/green tint filter over it?
$700,000 is meaningless when you're talking about a website that makes substantial money and has a rather large, paid staff for a video game website.
So you're not agreeing with it because of what?
And his $ from MS has nothing to do with this. Call upon that all you want. It's meaningless reaching and is nothing more than an attempt to discredit a review because people don't agree with it.
I swear it looks like that in every single comparison video. I also notice stuff missing in the xb1 version like background items and what not.