Aside from the weapons, tanks etc. I feel like I am playing a WW2 game in an alternate dimension. Rotterdam map reminds me of the Seine Crossing map in Battlefield 3. In general, the game fails to convince me that I am fighting in an actual WW2 setting.
Lol, this discussion is too funny.
"Looks like BF3"
"Plays like BF1"
Have you actually played it?
You don't need to play it to see what kind of game this is. Battlefield is one of gaming's monstricities. EA has identified Battlefield to be one of their flagship titles so they structure their massive workforce to pump one out every year. BF4, BF Hardline, Star Wars Battlefront, BF1, Star Wars Battlefront 2, and now BFV.
That's 6 of essentially the same game, in slightly different packaging, in 6 years.
They're massive, slickly packaged, formulaic games, built to appeal to as many people as possible. As Roberto Duran once said...
It's nice that you're looking forward to it, but as someone who wants to see change and creativity in this industry, I love reading about BFV's every misstep. Let's move on to the next thing already.
So you haven’t played it and you’re just blowing hot air, got it.
Meh. You'd never use the same logic if I spoke positivly about BFV. You enjoy yearly installments so you have to lobby for them. Lame.
some powerful bud you smokingAside from the weapons, tanks etc. I feel like I am playing a WW2 game in an alternate dimension. Rotterdam map reminds me of the Seine Crossing map in Battlefield 3. In general, the game fails to convince me that I am fighting in an actual WW2 setting.
Meh. You'd never use the same logic if I spoke positivly about BFV. You enjoy yearly installments so you have to lobby for them. Lame.
It would be funny if it had a map voting button.Says the guy that plays the same map over and over and over again.
I would bet that the BF regulars don't want a ton of "innovation". Moving back to ww2 is a huge step. I would bet most here have never played a ww2 BF game since it was only on PC way back in 2002. That plus adding battle royale is a big enough change.
As I always say, there's a core group of people who love BF games and really don't want to mess with them. I get that people that aren't really into them if you are just a casual fan. BF games can be frustrating at times as you really are just a single, insignificant soldier on a bigger battlefield.
Says the guy that plays the same map over and over and over again.
Because the people that think that are self absorbed pricks? Nobody, and I mean NOBODY likes someone who thinks they are smarter than everyone else. Especially when it's completely false.In politics, there's a reason why conservatives are often viewed as less intelligent.
Because the people that think that are self absorbed pricks? Nobody, and I mean NOBODY likes someone who thinks they are smarter than everyone else. Especially when it's completely false.
It's a conservative vs progressive issue isn't it?
In politics, there's a reason why conservatives are often viewed as less intelligent.
I'm not sure why one would be conservative in the entertainment/gaming realm though. I mean, what's the point?
Get that s*** out of this thread.... Please.....Who thinks they're smarter than "everyone else" though?
I would argue there's most likely a correlation between intelligence and political beliefs.
Edit: First result that popped up on Google...
https://www.google.com/amp/s/thecon...oesnt-mean-all-conservatives-are-stupid-57713
Yeah that's a totally logical tangent to go on, everybody.
Playing this demo, I enjoy the revive mechanic, at the very least. Otherwise it's a little too similar to BF1 still. The UI and gameplay come together to create something I'm just not entirely fond of.
And I'll be honest, the women running around kinda pull me out of the "fantasy" most games attempt to create. I don't recall many asian women fighting in europe.