Oh women. Can't live with them, can't live without them. Can't wait until Hillary becomes president. Women don't have enough rights already. Handing out restraining orders like candy isn't enough.
I agree that the language used does add something to the world and atmosphere that they have for the fame, but I also think that as a developer, if you go ahead with including stuff that could be offensive, you need to be able to/expect some backlash from overly sensitive groups.
I think she was grasping at straws for a story here, and needed a scapegoat for a new rant.
But still, its her prerogative to speak out. I dare say it wont be the last time someone uses an ill-informed stance for debate.
thing is with feminists you can't take them seriously. I can't stop hearing about the greatness of Caitlyn Jenner because she is removing her penis. If you're a fan of Game of Thrones there was a big uproar about the Sansa episode with Bolton where she was raped. The internet exploded with GOT going too far. There wasn't a peep from anyone when Bolton cuts Reek's member off and mails it to his father. So as long as men are suffering or wanting to become anything but a man it is celebrated?
but she fights with her top open, that negates all else.
Slightly un-related, but in my city, feminists have united for a yearly event called 'The Slut Walk'. 1000's of women dress up provocatively and march through the cbd, to prove that "Women don't 'ask' to be raped. No matter what they wear"
I think its great to embrace your inner slut. Viva le sexual revolution!
Dressing provocatively logically will elicit a provocative response.That seems a bit stupid. Sure, woman do not ask to be raped. However, it is not just woman who dress provocatively that get raped. Plus, woman should know by now that if you dress a certain way, you will attract undesired attention. Is it right, no, but being ignorant to the world you live in is just stupid. That ignorance is likely where the comment of "she is asked for it" comes from.
It's not stupid. You are allowed to be sexy without being harassed. Women shouldn't have to live in fear when they choose to be confident in their appearance, knowing that any sex appeal will attract unwarranted, unwanted attention. Men know the difference between wanted and unwanted. Women shouldn't have to know they can't dress confidently. Men should have to know that "no" is "no." I'm sure you'd feel exactly the same if a man refused to leave you alone until he received sexual favors.That seems a bit stupid. Sure, woman do not ask to be raped. However, it is not just woman who dress provocatively that get raped. Plus, woman should know by now that if you dress a certain way, you will attract undesired attention. Is it right, no, but being ignorant to the world you live in is just stupid. That ignorance is likely where the comment of "she is asked for it" comes from.
It's not stupid. You are allowed to be sexy without being harassed. Women shouldn't have to live in fear when they choose to be confident in their appearance, knowing that any sex appeal will attract unwarranted, unwanted attention. Men know the difference between wanted and unwanted. Women shouldn't have to know they can't dress confidently. Men should have to know that "no" is "no." I'm sure you'd feel exactly the same if a man refused to leave you alone without any sexual favors.
Hehe yeah. The thing is though, cultural differences dictate what is considered provocative...
"That woman is exposing her hair! What a slut!"
A big part of their stance is, rather than teach our women to dress conservatively, why not teach everyone to not rape/sexually objectify.
Now bring me my naked men. As long as they all have six-packs and are underwear models.
I'm pretty sure you also said the march is stupid because woman should expect unwarranted sexual harassment for the way they dress.Pretty sure I just said it isn't right *looks back over post* yep, I definitely said that.
I'm pretty sure you also said the march is stupid because woman should expect unwarranted sexual harassment for the way they dress.
I think there's too much to this issue to actually debate properly.
Wearing a short skirt or a skimpy top isn't necessarily the only thing that is provocative in the world. Travel a bit, and you'll see the culture shock from places.
In Australia at the moment, our major cities are dealing with issues of cultural ghettos for the first time, and now wearing a normal skirt and a blouse is considered offensive in parts. Some of them have hairdressers with the windows blacked out, so no man can see people without a hijab on.
And its great that there are opportunities for these cultures to flourish.
But in saying that, its already proven, that there is no goto of what is and isn't offensive. I've been refused entry into countries until I put on long sleeve shorts that covered me/my tattoos.
As someone who gets a lot of s*** yelled at me from people driving by, I've embraced most of it, because the alternative is actually draining. Taking offense is too much work for me.
But I'm willing to bet, if you scream "c***" at someone as they're walking up the street, people around you are going to take offense, even if they aren't the victim.
There is a difference between someone whistling or telling you you are sexy because you dressed as so and someone just being an a****** and constantly badgering someone and asking if they can screw you in the ass. This is a very lopsided problem women exclusively have to deal with. The best way to understand this is to go to a gay bar dressed like a handsome young man and see how quickly you get fed up with the harassment and ass-slapping.That isn't what I said, or at least, that isn't what I meant.
Dressing provocatively is done intentionally to provoke sexual attention. You can not dress in such a way and then claim the response was unwarranted. Having said that, it doesn't mean these woman are being asked to be raped either. but they are seeking that male sexual attention. Maybe for actual sex or maybe for self esteem issues.
Like I said, dressing one way and expecting the opposite response to which the physical appearance provokes is just plain ignorance.
As for the march, it is stupid because they dress in the manner that provokes sexual attention. All that does is exacerbate the issue, not fix it. Plus, the whole provocative dressing issue is only part of the "They asked for it" issue.
I'm pretty sure you also said the march is stupid because woman should expect unwarranted sexual harassment for the way they dress.
I think there's too much to this issue to actually debate properly.
Wearing a short skirt or a skimpy top isn't necessarily the only thing that is provocative in the world. Travel a bit, and you'll see the culture shock from places.
In Australia at the moment, our major cities are dealing with issues of cultural ghettos for the first time, and now wearing a normal skirt and a blouse is considered offensive in parts. Some of them have hairdressers with the windows blacked out, so no man can see people without a hijab on.
And its great that there are opportunities for these cultures to flourish.
But in saying that, its already proven, that there is no goto of what is and isn't offensive. I've been refused entry into countries until I put on long sleeve shorts that covered me/my tattoos.
As someone who gets a lot of s*** yelled at me from people driving by, I've embraced most of it, because the alternative is actually draining. Taking offense is too much work for me.
But I'm willing to bet, if you scream "c***" at someone as they're walking up the street, people around you are going to take offense, even if they aren't the victim.
Yeah the whole asking for it thing is stupid, as you said Menace they are asking for attention and I can't stand when girls who wear extremely short skirts or low cut tops act like they aren't begging for people to notice them when they dress that way.....