No you have it backwards and rumors of Apple buying Disney are out in the wild.Disney would probably buy Apple first
i know MS had looks their stake in Apple long ago, but doesn’t bill gates own like a 3 billion dollar stake in them?
now I know I’m having steak for lunch
What’s organic traffic coverage?Document confirms Epic paid influencers to “disrupt Steam’s organic traffic coverage” on page 151
DocumentCloud
www.documentcloud.org
What’s organic traffic coverage?
In the full ruling, Judge Gonzalez-Rogers explained her thinking on the issue in greater detail. “The court cannot ultimately conclude that apple is a monopolist under either federal or state antitrust laws,” she writes in the ruling. “Nonetheless, the trial did show that apple is engaging in anti-competitive conduct under California’s competition laws.”permanently restrained and enjoined from prohibiting developers from including in their apps and their metadata buttons, external links, or other calls to action that direct customers to purchasing mechanisms, in addition to In-App Purchasing and (ii) communicating with customers through points of contact obtained voluntarily from customers through account registration within the app.
Apple must allow other forms of in-app purchase, rules judge in Epic v. Apple
The app store model on trial.www.theverge.com
Under the new order, Apple is:
In the full ruling, Judge Gonzalez-Rogers explained her thinking on the issue in greater detail. “The court cannot ultimately conclude that apple is a monopolist under either federal or state antitrust laws,” she writes in the ruling. “Nonetheless, the trial did show that apple is engaging in anti-competitive conduct under California’s competition laws.”
I do not so much as support Epic as I despite Apple (as well as another monopolies) overcharging developers because its a monopoly. 30% royalty (before tax) is outrageous.Apple must allow other forms of in-app purchase, rules judge in Epic v. Apple
The app store model on trial.www.theverge.com
Under the new order, Apple is:
In the full ruling, Judge Gonzalez-Rogers explained her thinking on the issue in greater detail. “The court cannot ultimately conclude that apple is a monopolist under either federal or state antitrust laws,” she writes in the ruling. “Nonetheless, the trial did show that apple is engaging in anti-competitive conduct under California’s competition laws.”