Tomb Raider 2015 Timed? Exclusive To Xbox

Status
Not open for further replies.
pravus said:
That's true to an extent I suppose. I remember a while back someone accused me of being a Sony fanboy because my opinion on whatever didn't particularly line-up with theirs in tat particular instance... post history be damned. :lol:
Click to expand...

It's a trend I've noticed as well. If your opinion doesn't conform with the majority of pro-xbox posters here, you get labelled.
 
TOPDAWG said:
Whats funny is if this game does come to PS4 the MS lovers in here will be all like well its does not matter the game is old news now. The PS4 can have Ones lift overs from this game nobody cares about the game now.
Click to expand...

I think that depends on when (if) it comes.
 
Last 2 pages or so.....toilet of UnionVGF for sure.

o_O

BTW we don't even know if there will be a PS4 version for certain.
So why are we arguing about resolutions/framerates again?

To my knowledge there is only one version of RTTR coming out.
 
The Living Tribunal said:
Last 2 pages or so.....toilet of UnionVGF for sure.

o_O

BTW we don't even know if there will be a PS4 version for certain.
So why are we arguing about resolutions/framerates again?

To my knowledge there is only one version of RTTR coming out.
Click to expand...
Living Tribunal,

Do your mod magic and delete the appropriate posts.
 
DriedMangoes said:
It's a trend I've noticed as well. If your opinion doesn't conform with the majority of pro-xbox posters here, you get labelled.
Click to expand...

If you post things to provoke a reaction you'll get one or twenty.

You say going by the past we can assume that TRR will be 1080P/30. I say by going by the past, they could possibly optimize to get better performance.

Hell, even Crystal Dynamics said the performance issue was scewed because they locked the X1 version at 30. The framrate actually went above that at times.

I don't think you or Val are trolls. But by assuming the worst it comes across that way.
 
Last edited:
Dno69 said:
If you post things to provoke a reaction you'll get one or twenty.

You say going by the past we can assume that TRR will be 1080P/30. I say by going by the past, they could possibly optimize to get better performance.

Hell, even Crystal Dynamics said the performance issue was scewed because they locked the X1 version at 30. The framrate actually went above that at times.
Click to expand...

Hopefully that will be the case for this game. 1080/60 or even like the ps4 version of TR: DE would be good enough for me (40-60 FPS).
 
Intellivision

Na I'll leave this for Plainview to deal with when he gets back on.
Fair warning some of you really need to learn how to word your responses. We can have serious discussion in here and differing opinions without being buttholes. Not naming names or anything but just the general flow of conversation for the last 2-3 pages. Alot of baiting.

I agree with some of what is being said but some of you need to step back and realize not everything is set in stone. Especially on consoles.
 
Last edited:
DriedMangoes said:
Hopefully that will be the case for this game. 1080/60 or even like the ps4 version of TR: DE would be good enough for me (40-60 FPS).
Click to expand...

Microsoft has been helping a few studios reach better performance. I'm sure their goal is 1080P/60.

I could live with 900P/60 or like you said 1080P 40-60.
 
The Living Tribunal said:
Last 2 pages or so.....toilet of UnionVGF for sure.

o_O

BTW we don't even know if there will be a PS4 version for certain.
So why are we arguing about resolutions/framerates again?

To my knowledge there is only one version of RTTR coming out.
Click to expand...

meh sometimes I'm dumb and reply to some of the dip-s***s on the site. I try not to do it to much.
 
Kreten said:
Where does anyone say that "The Rise of Tomb Raider" is a Timed exclusive?
You guys are so funny and trying to be deceptive by taking one thing and twisting it around.

MS investing their own money into development and Publishing of the game, and you expect it to come to Sony platform-that's just being delirious. Every deal has a duration obviously.

So instead of calling microsoft names and how they are liars and what not first get some common sense and learn to read.

Why would I pay money to have something made for my competitors?

And please prove it to me that word "duration" has to do with time length instead of "for as long as criteria is kept".
Obviously since MS is funding it's more likelly to mean "for a duration that MS provides funding" vs "only for holyday season 205"

It is exclusive, is it to hard for you to comprehend? Is Bloodborne exclusive forever? Has Sony said anything about it? Did you interogate them about it? Ask them and see if their deal has a duration as nothing is forever. So untill you guys go give crap to Sony about Bloodborne stop giving MS crap about doing same thing. You are clearly showing double standards and most of this is directed at Valliance.

Everything has a duration unless you buy the IP. Duration doesn't mean "timed" it means "for as long as something is happening"
Which could mean 1 year, 5 years, 10 years, 50 years etc. Word duration by itself is not enough to label it as timed especially considering MS is investing money into it.

ME only came to PS because Microsoft sold it or gave it up for a favour, and as I said are you guys questioning Bloodborne or anything else by Sony as this double standard is pissing me off.

Why does it matter to them? Sales numbers don't matter as much as profit. So look at it this way: spend money developing on 5 platforms and sell 7mil at ~$50=$350mil-$100mil development cost-$150 to $250mil marketing and distributing left them with less than $50million profit. (They broke even after selling more than 5 million copies)

Now take MS funding development and marketing that means you would need to sell only 2 million copies on x1 and x360 to have same profit as on 5 platforms on previous game. Considering that it'll be exclusive also gives it extra focus on making a game better as you only need to worry about 3 platforms vs 5 which makes it a bigger hit, I expect it to sell at least 5 million first year which puts it in higher profit margin than previous TR.

Yeah as they are not on the same level, we have Ryse to compete with UC4 :-). Game that is short and only has had time spent on making it look good is no good investment at all. That's why I would never buy either of those two. Halo is just massive scale and looks decent.

Then we should all take everything Sony says as lies and looking to stick it to people with spyware, security breaches etc? Don't do double standards.

You are such a fricking troll and childish. It has to be step down visualy to hit 1080p60fps? Ever heard of optimisations and graphics getting better throughout generation? So UC and UC3 looked exactly the same or was UC3 running at lower resolution and fps?




God how stupid some people choose to sound.

Why is it that the 40% power difference still has not showed? Why doesn't single exclusive on Ps4 look better than Ryse? Why is it that after Witcher (i think) was sopposed to be released at 900p and MS helped them with actually using eSRAM properly they will be hitting 1080p? PS4 is still to prove that it's more powerful, it only showed that it's simpler so far and that it doesn't have anything exclusive that looks better than xbox exclusives.
Click to expand...
It will be only on XB platforms for the 2015 duration. Its pretty clear actually.
The only stupid thing I see is your lack of knowing how to spell and you calling a SONY owned Franchise that's MADE BY SONY with help from From Software a double standard to what MS the SEPARATE PUBLISHER SQUARE/ENIX (not Crystal Dynamics a dev team like some have ignorantly said) TR deal is.

You must not of been paying attention as I see many cases where the PS4 version of a game has 40 or MORE percent higher resolution and or FPS. So yeah 40% percent stronger has been shown and continues to be shown as current and upcoming games are still behind on the X1.
Get your calculator ready and go here http://www.ign.com/wikis/xbox-one/PS4_vs._Xbox_One_Native_Resolutions_and_Framerates
 
VaLLiancE said:
It will be only on XB platforms for the 2015 duration. Its pretty clear actually.
The only stupid thing I see is your lack of knowing how to spell and you calling a SONY owned Franchise that's MADE BY SONY with help from From Software a double standard to what MS the SEPARATE PUBLISHER SQUARE/ENIX (not Crystal Dynamics a dev team like some have ignorantly said) TR deal is.

You must not of been paying attention as I see many cases where the PS4 version of a game has 40 or MORE percent higher resolution and or FPS. So yeah 40% percent stronger has been shown and continues to be shown as current and upcoming games are still behind on the X1.
Get your calculator ready and go here http://www.ign.com/wikis/xbox-one/PS4_vs._Xbox_One_Native_Resolutions_and_Framerates
Click to expand...
Living Tribunal...... do your magic! Some people are getting mighty toasty.... and off topic.
 
Dno69 said:
I don't think what you're saying is childish. Because it is a probable truth. It's the provacative nature in which you bring the thought across and also the automatic assumptions that come with it.

I don't get offended because I've come to know your personality enough to know that you're not the subtle type and you dont mind if your opinion goes against the grain ( in both forums).
Click to expand...

Yeah I speak my mind on things I don't like on all formats.
If these forums didn't have so much foolish xbox biased things being spewed it would seem equal.
Truth is I prob get more on my Sony only friends then the XB biased ones here.
I know some that never buy anything XB on purpose and support every 1st party Sony exclusive crappy or not. I let em have it lol
 
  • Like
Reactions: Dno69
I don't think the Bloodborne thing is the same. But I could see how some could be pissed that its not Demon Souls 3 and multiplat when it basically is Demon Souls 3.

But good on Sony. And good on Microsoft imo.
 
Dno69 said:
I don't think the Bloodborne thing is the same. But I could see how some could be pissed that its not Demon Souls 3 and multiplat when it basically is Demon Souls 3.

But good on Sony. And good on Microsoft imo.
Click to expand...
Its not as Sony owns Demons Souls and BB.
Dark Souls isn't in the series even though many like myself group em all together nor is it owned by Sony.
 
I don't know why PS gamers are still up in arms about this. It's a timed exclusive. PS owners are used to games getting delayed anyway. Just playing! ;)
 
TDbank24 said:
I saw your post after i hit the post button and thought.. aw sh!t. Then i read the last two pages and said ut oh..

I almost put a disclaimer; spare me TLT! :D
Click to expand...

godfather-ea-forgives-you.jpg
 
Joy another topic turned into a vs./Resolution mess by the usual suspects and with some insults to boot.
 
Yep as I said.

I think until we get some game play videos and actual game info this topic has come to an end.
 
Status
Not open for further replies.
Top Bottom
Back