Yeah, the Meat Quest Pro was supposed to be their line of defense against the coming Apple headset, but even at $1500 (it's now $1K) it's not even remotely in the same ballpark. Maybe the lenses and eye tracking are there, but the display and UI is where it's going to have to take Samsung/Google to even compete, I think.It's expensive, but holy mother of god, that tech inside is insane.
I don't know about the Pro, but I like that this allowed you to still see your surroundings.Yeah, the Meat Quest Pro was supposed to be their line of defense against the coming Apple headset, but even at $1500 (it's now $1K) it's not even remotely in the same ballpark. Maybe the lenses and eye tracking are there, but the display and UI is where it's going to have to take Samsung/Google to even compete, I think.
They need killer apps….if Kojima came out wearing one and was like “yo, bruh, this s*** slaps….I’m making DS3 for this” I’d buy it closer to said release.I'd like one, but not at this price. I don't care how advanced it is on paper. lol
They nailed the passive (casual) AR/VR experience, but I think that the omission of immersive gaming (and lack of tactile controllers) will end up leading people right back to Meta.Just watched the whole presentation. Apple nailed what VR should be. They nailed everything about it. Sure, price is a killer, but it is an amazing piece of tech that nobody is close, by generations, to what this device is capable of.
The Meta Quest Pro has video passthrough, as does the recently announced Quest 3. Mark my words, this Apple Vision Pro is going to help sell a lot of $500 Quest 3s this fall, just out of newly found interest in a standalone mixed reality headset!... The choices they made for this next Quest now make a lot more sense, after the Apple reveal!I don't know about the Pro, but I like that this allowed you to still see your surroundings.
Yeah, this seems to have a much broader public market, where ms went to the private sector like the military or architecture/engineering industry, and every other vr set is aimed at gaming, kids or educational.They nailed the passive (casual) AR/VR experience, but I think that the omission of immersive gaming (and lack of tactile controllers) will end up leading people right back to Meta.
What's interesting, is that the price of the Vision Pro is the exact same as Hololens 2, but the UI, software and display are so much better on the Vision Pro. I have to wonder where Hololens 3 would be by now, of they had kept trying.Yeah, this seems to have a much broader public market, where ms went to the private sector like the military or architecture/engineering industry, and every other vr set is aimed at gaming, kids or educational.
Hmmm, haven’t kept up with that, but I think it’s like an ever continuing development, their biggest contract for HoloLens is with the military. Maybe they customize it specifically for each contract?What's interesting, is that the price of the Vision Pro is the exact same as Hololens 2, but the UI, software and display are so much better on the Vision Pro. I have to wonder where Hololens 3 would be by now, of they had kept trying.
It's a gray area. Despite people claiming that the IVAS (military version of Hololens) was canceled, it's actually being revised into a more compact unit, per US military request.Hmmm, haven’t kept up with that, but I think it’s like an ever continuing development, their biggest contract for HoloLens is with the military. Maybe they customize it specifically for each contract?