Battlefield Hardline PS4=900p, Xbox One=720p
- Thread starter Plainview
- Start date
I had hopes of it being decent. I still may get it, but the beta did nothing to get me excited about it, and I've played every BF game going back to BF1942 beta (Wake Island for life!)
I still might get it, IF there are no serious launch issues. I bet others will too even though none of us "like" it
No, it isn't nostalgia....I even said it wasn't.
Nostalgia:
Did you miss where I said I still play those games now? If you still experience what you like now, despite how old it is....it's not nostalgia.
720p is the worse off trade. It would have been better if they just toned down the Xbox One graphics and level of detail instead of the resolution. 720p is pretty ugly, especially on larger TVs.
You are right about that. Cops and robbers is unrealistic in a war game. Let's add zombies instead!
You are right about that. Cops and robbers is unrealistic in a war game. Let's add zombies instead!
Last edited:
720p is the worse off trade. It would have been better if they just toned down the Xbox One graphics and level of detail instead of the resolution. 720p is pretty ugly, especially on larger TVs.
You are right about that. Cops and robbers is unrealistic in a war game. Let's add zombies instead!
Agreed. 720p and 900p are both ass. 1080p is where it's at.
So Call of Duty: Advanced Warfare is still the pinnacle of first person shooters? That's what i thought.
I still remember buying expansions for Battlefield 2. And I still remember going to EA's website to download executables for the latest patches for online play. It's weird thinking about gaming of the past.
The way i see it, EA is paying for the servers, and so we have to pay for the games. I think it's fair. And paying $60 is definitely nicer than having to paying $8,000,000/year or whatever their cost is for those servers. I definitely don't envy EA's position to have to pay all of this.
BC1 & BC2 were not great Battlefield games. However, they were never meant to be. They were a spin-off with a healthy helping of Battefield ethos, and it worked, it worked very well. Both the Bad Company games were very good games.
Which brings me back to a point I made before. They should have stuck with that original plan of keeping Battlefield on PC only and keeping the Bad Company spin-off on consoles.
Was that really their plan? I have read people online saying that it should be that way before but I don't remember ever seeing anything from EA or DICE that said that. I could have easily missed that though so I'm not saying you are wrong, I just don't remember it myself.
Sure do, Almost 20 million Destiny accounts have been made and many of the sites that ratedGot higher metacritic score
lolz, you have nowhere to go.
it soso are STILL playing it non stop with weekly videos of them raiding/nightfalling.
AND its a NEW franchise!
WOW
BC2 was the best BF game ever made.
EA was smart to move away from the old stagnate style.
BF4 is also a great game but was unfortunately plagued with issues early on.
Still made more money then any other BF game if I am not mistaken the last few BF's are EA's biggest money making franchise.
COD is becoming less and less popular where BF's fan-base is growing.
EA was smart to move away from the old stagnate style.
BF4 is also a great game but was unfortunately plagued with issues early on.
Still made more money then any other BF game if I am not mistaken the last few BF's are EA's biggest money making franchise.
COD is becoming less and less popular where BF's fan-base is growing.
With record breaking beta numbers many did.I had a lot of fun with the beta.
Day 1 for me.
Bad Company...not sure what it was that I liked about it so much. I guess it was a combination of the campaign humor, the maps and the fluid gameplay. It just stuck with me. I want BC3.
I definitely remember them saying that. They were going to do Bad Company for the story stuff, and BF would keep doing it's thing.