DF vs. Titanfall (Xbox One/PC)
- Thread starter DriedMangoes
- Start date
Depends if you like the comic looking graphics. Titanfall goes for the more colourful IQ while COD: G looks more realistic to me.
Its fact that TF looks better based on Source vs Q3 engine alone.
Source is FAR more advanced and TF does far more then any COD game.
Source is FAR more advanced and TF does far more then any COD game.
I don't care how much more advanced the engine is. Visually, the game looks worse. Don't make go posting screens tomorrow comparing.
Still screens (LOL)don't and can't in this case tell the whole story.
Source is more current/advanced then the Q3 engine FACT.
TF is uses a more current/advanced engine and is doing more/more taxing.
Source is more current/advanced then the Q3 engine FACT.
TF is uses a more current/advanced engine and is doing more/more taxing.
Right...wAlking on walls.
Screens tell us a lot about how it LOOkS. Visually, bo2 looks better.
Say what you want and post deceiving STILLS but in motion TF looks better.
Heck Download the videos of the PC versions of both maxed from gamersyde and they will speak for themselves.
Lol...I have the game on pc, visually, to the eye, it's worse.
Wtf, you think in motion the textures, lighting, shadows, minute details, etc...will magically get better? lol
Who cares if you have the games I played em both on the PC.
http://www.gamersyde.com/download_call_of_duty_ghosts_multiplayer_tdm-31126_en.html
http://www.gamersyde.com/download_call_of_duty_ghosts_multiplayer_tdm-31126_en.html
http://www.gamersyde.com/download_titanfall_campaign_airbase-31678_en.html
http://www.gamersyde.com/download_call_of_duty_ghosts_multiplayer_tdm-31126_en.html
http://www.gamersyde.com/download_call_of_duty_ghosts_multiplayer_tdm-31126_en.html
http://www.gamersyde.com/download_titanfall_campaign_airbase-31678_en.html
Outside of differences in art direction, both look on par with each.....with the CoD map having more map effects going on (not talking about the effects generated by the action) and several spots having better textures on CoD.
You know that the Source engine is derived from GoldSrc (HL1 engine) which was also based off of Quake 3 engine right? Per wikipedia per John Carmack.
Origins
Source distantly originates from the GoldSrc engine, itself a heavily modified version of John D. Carmack's Quake engine. Carmack commented on his blog in 2004 that "there are still bits of early Quake code in Half-Life 2".[39] Valve employee Erik Johnson explained the engine's nomenclature on the Valve Developer Community:[40]
Origins
Source distantly originates from the GoldSrc engine, itself a heavily modified version of John D. Carmack's Quake engine. Carmack commented on his blog in 2004 that "there are still bits of early Quake code in Half-Life 2".[39] Valve employee Erik Johnson explained the engine's nomenclature on the Valve Developer Community:[40]
And? That's like saying UE 4 is like UE 1 because they share things and it was birthed from it.
From birth it was superior though and you do know it has had had many updates/improvements?
From birth it was superior though and you do know it has had had many updates/improvements?
I love how xb1 fanboys always claim they never have performance problems when it is a fact that FPS drops in the games they try to claim it never happens in.
How is this post trolling? He is only stating facts.
How is this post trolling? He is only stating facts.
KVally, you're such a fanboy. How can you not be having any issues?
Don't you realize how underpowered the Xbox One is? Or have you already forgotten from the hundreds of other times you've been reminded of this fact?
Don't you realize how underpowered the Xbox One is? Or have you already forgotten from the hundreds of other times you've been reminded of this fact?
Same here. I'm pretty sensitive to FPS drops, but I haven't had many in TF. Definitely way fewer than in BF4. I don't have an fps counter but BF4 seems to dip rather badly, while TF has been pretty smooth. I mean, I'm not claiming it always stays at 60, but the dips don't really bother me.
I honestly think people are seeing lag rather than FPS issues. I've definitely had some lag which impacts performance. It doesn't seem like FPS issues.
Yup....I would never say the issues don't exist (cuz it's proven they do for some). Just glad I haven't had those issues. I remember the beta bringing FPS down to nearly zero in a Titan only match with all the Titans in the same area. I haven't had those issues yet in retail, which is nice. Granted, I have only been playing the game since it came out, which isn't that long ago. But I got some good hours into it and finished the campaign twice, and it's been smooth sailing. Love it.
When you've seen it posted a hundred times before, it's trolling.
So I'm a fanboy because I don't experience the frame rate drops through out the game and only experience it in very specific situations?
Please refrain from continually using the term "fanboy."
For someone who complains about his/her opinion being attacked, Hiss attacks others opinions if it doesn't line up with his/hers.
The problem is the game has FPS drops and that is not an OPINION. It is a FACT. Nothing to do with my opinion, you can claim the game doesn't have fps drops all you want but you are certainly full of sh*t if you do so. How can you not experience FPS drops if the game has FPS drops?
I play on the PC and my PC poops on xb1 and I still get fps drops on one map. And we know which version of the game is better.
I play on the PC and my PC poops on xb1 and I still get fps drops on one map. And we know which version of the game is better.
Last edited:
Stop putting words into my mouth. You just stated you experience FPS drops while trying to say you don't experience FPS drops. I don't need to call you a fanboy, yoy already did that.