http://www.examiner.com/article/penello-microsoft-will-talk-about-xbox-one-s-architecture-very-soon
https://twitter.com/albertpenello/status/380951662900178946
Sorry People but I had to put this gif up....lol
Last edited:
Penello: Microsoft will talk about Xbox One's architecture "very soon"
- Thread starter Chief Legend
- Start date
http://www.examiner.com/article/penello-microsoft-will-talk-about-xbox-one-s-architecture-very-soon
https://twitter.com/albertpenello/status/380951662900178946
Sorry People but I had to put this gif up....lol
No they prefer to keep him in order to twist each and every word of his into anti-XboxOne propaganda.
No they need him to try to make him look stupid
He's like SpongeBob, alone in a giant community of thousands of Squidwards.
It doesn't matter who says what, GAF will find excuses to dismiss what is said anyhow. I'd like to see Panello set up a round of interviews with MS's and AMD's engineers to go over design philosophy/motivations/considerations/priorities as well as walk through the decisions to go more fixed function on the processing side and give a detailed run down of how they expect devs to leverage their specialized kit. Interviews with DF, Anandtech, Arstechnica, techcrunch, etc. Do an AMA over at B3d and Reddit (f*** GAF) after the various interviews go live. Maybe MS could set up some devs to dig into the details of how they are using the X1 architecture as well.
Then when the various websites start backpedalling on their premature 'durr 50% more powah!' nonsense from February with new articles questioning the GAF hivemind's consensus we can sit back and enjoy the meltdowns as GAF'ers turn on all the publications (like they already have with DF).
Then when the various websites start backpedalling on their premature 'durr 50% more powah!' nonsense from February with new articles questioning the GAF hivemind's consensus we can sit back and enjoy the meltdowns as GAF'ers turn on all the publications (like they already have with DF).
Doesn't stop there. Some tech blog "telephoned" that information into an article with a title that says 50 x (times) the power.
Pretty soon PS4 will be energizing an entire solar system.
It doesn't matter who says what, GAF will find excuses to dismiss what is said anyhow. I'd like to see Panello set up a round of interviews with MS's and AMD's engineers to go over design philosophy/motivations/considerations/priorities as well as walk through the decisions to go more fixed function on the processing side and give a detailed run down of how they expect devs to leverage their specialized kit. Interviews with DF, Anandtech, Arstechnica, techcrunch, etc. Do an AMA over at B3d and Reddit (f*** GAF) after the various interviews go live. Maybe MS could set up some devs to dig into the details of how they are using the X1 architecture as well.
Then when the various websites start backpedalling on their premature 'durr 50% more powah!' nonsense from February with new articles questioning the GAF hivemind's consensus we can sit back and enjoy the meltdowns as GAF'ers turn on all the publications (like they already have with DF).
That sounded beautiful.
It doesn't matter who says what, GAF will find excuses to dismiss what is said anyhow. I'd like to see Panello set up a round of interviews with MS's and AMD's engineers to go over design philosophy/motivations/considerations/priorities as well as walk through the decisions to go more fixed function on the processing side and give a detailed run down of how they expect devs to leverage their specialized kit. Interviews with DF, Anandtech, Arstechnica, techcrunch, etc. Do an AMA over at B3d and Reddit (f*** GAF) after the various interviews go live. Maybe MS could set up some devs to dig into the details of how they are using the X1 architecture as well.
Then when the various websites start backpedalling on their premature 'durr 50% more powah!' nonsense from February with new articles questioning the GAF hivemind's consensus we can sit back and enjoy the meltdowns as GAF'ers turn on all the publications (like they already have with DF).
Great plan. And single handedly removes GAF's respect threshold in the industry. That site is nothng of what it once represented.
The funny thing about all this is very soon lines up with the NDA that is supposed to end in about a week. I still don't believe it, but it should be interesting to get a real answer.
i'd also like to hear the above. but i don't expect Xbox to be anything other than the lower spec'd console.
i'd also like MS to start showing the multi-plats that are coming to the system and running on Xbox. not sum dumbed down PC.
Iv'e lurked and been a member of that site since like 2003, it's always had it's crazies on both sides. What's up people? How everyone liking new forums?
A thread ran for several days in the IGN Xbox forum titled Why is Microsoft Releasing A Less Powerful Console Than The PS4? So I posted a rebuttle thread called Why Is Sony Releasing A Less Capable Console Than The XB1? MY thread was shut down almost immediately, but it was asking a legitimate question. How do the two consoles compare, not from a power perspective, but from a capability standpoint?
That title is crazy Hammer. Anyone thinking that Microsoft is going to allow Sony to 1up them is nuts and will be severely disappointed when these consoles release. Not for nothing but thats just crazy talk.
Some of you xbox fans seem a little too concerned about the ps4. You seem to bring it up every time. You should just be looking forward to the xbox and forget about this 30% or 50% power difference drivel. You won't notice a difference in multiplats and if ps4 would show any power advantage, it would only be in exclusives that are released in the later years of its life. Otherwise the consoles are pretty neck and neck.
Why would you want to interview those suits when you can interview DEM EXPERTZ at teh GAF?
True. I'm sure GAF would love to have MS's engineers interview GAF's self-proclaimed experts to so that MS could learn how the X1 was built. ha.
Just like I suspected. All of that "We can't wait to show you the truth" and "In the coming months you'll see" was all just a smoke screen.
Let this be a lesson. When someone tells you it's not about money, it's ABOUT money. When someone tells you that their paper specs don't tell the full story, their paper specs TELL THE FULL STORY.
but but but, the dual 7990's in the bf4 demo kits!!!!!
but but but, the dual 7970's in the dev kits!!!!
can't wait for the spin lmao
Your jumping way ahead of yourself Ghost. Paper specs aren't amounting to squat. Seriously, the only smoke screen is the one Sony is presenting to all of us right now when the games are on par equally for both consoles, this includes the paper specs. Again, let the games speak for the system the way they always have.
By the way he doesn't say that none of it's true mate, he's saying to not expect a bomb. 10:1 what will be explained in the future about the architecture in the X1 by the engineers will be debated, bashed and doubted regardless the outcome.
There doesn't have to be dGPU's or 7990's etc obviously, as X1 games look great! That's all many ever care about.
Last edited:
Well I definitely agree with you on games. And I hope MS realizes that they're going to need a serious number of exclusives to set them apart this generation. They aren't going to be able to count on the multiplatformers to make their case for them anymore. They're going to need exclusives that take full advantage of whatever the hardware is capable of.
As for the X1's architects, do you really believe that whatever they end up revealing will have an impact on how games are developed? The only thing Penello is saying is that they're going to talk about the X1.
