wholy chitEven though this is probably fake I have decided I want it to be real
The Official E3 2017 Thread
- Thread starter Rollins
- Start date
They haven't won a E3 since the 360 days(heck those were some of the best E3's ever)
Drag that chit out with 4K HDR streaming service support for Vudu,Amazon Netflix etc
And go on about how good the UHDBR player is ie announce Dolby Vision support and I'm GOOD.
I agree. But when you say that Xbox gamers only own the system for multilayer games, that's not true. That's a big generalization.
I liked the way Sony presented their show last year, just enough talking so it didn't feel rushed.
With this move to mid gen refreshes vs actual new gen consoles I think spending too much time talking about hardware can be tricky, you have no new console exclusives that can really show what the new hardware can really do. No game can be made to truly take advantage of the Pro or Scorpio as long as they have to work on the previous machines too. Obviously they'll make the games look better and a bit more stable but they are still going to be anchored to games for a console that's quite a bit older. As long as this is the way it's going to be done from now on it's going to make it a little less exciting when new hardware is shown IMO.
Shawn Layden said it's going to be pretty much the same this year.
Nailed it. That's why PS4 will continue to be the best console this gen. It's all about the games. People wanted to say it was all about resolution but nobody cared about that. People bought into PS4 early because they knew the games would come eventually. Look at PS2/PS3. Slow launches, but picked up steam in the end.
I was blown away by Sony's show last E3.
The only knock is some of the games that they presented are still far off from release. But that's an industry norm now.
[edit: that was an Xbox avatar, but he changed it.]
You change your avatar so often, even you lose track of whose side you're on.
Last edited:
You change your avatar so often, even you lose track of whose side you're on.
When i feel like watching TV or a movie i go with Xbox. When i feel like playing games i go with PS4.
And Sony's was only 1 hour and 15 minutes. That is why I don't want 2 hour conferences. It just ends up being talking and fluff.
When i feel like watching TV or a movie i go with Xbox. When i feel like playing games i go with PS4.
Better switch back by Sunday. Microsoft is gonna bring it like Brady.
I don't know about all that. They might throw a few touchdowns, but Brady? He's got 5 rings. Kinda like Sony.
It's always been about the games. It still is. It was during the 16 but era. Both consoles had great games then and do now.
These commentators are acting pretentious and seem to be anti power now when it was all about the power in 2013. Technology and platform features can help make good and great games better. If they didn't, we'd still be gaming on OG Xbox and PS2.
It never was though. Xbox fans let themselves feel like lesser gamers because they didn't have the power advantage anymore. If PS gamers acted like they cared, it was just to get under their skin. It's always been about the games. PS1, PS2, and PS3 were all considered the weakest consoles of their respective gens and they all sold close to or over 100 million. Xbox fans are the only people who have ever cared about power. #irrefutablefacts
Power isn't everything but it's part of the equation. Power, price and Mattrick's mouth were the holy trinity for PS4 this gen. Through 2+ years, Sony's only AAA exclusive that cracked through the top 10 in their yearly sales was Bloodbourne. Everything else was multiplat.
I didn't know Bellybama was making a game...
TD PLZ JUST USE A AVATAR WITH MULTIPLE CONSOLES!When i feel like watching TV or a movie i go with Xbox. When i feel like playing games i go with PS4.
I BEG YOU!
Don't feel bad. If Sony didn't get cocky after blowing OG Xbox out of the water with PS2 then it's likely the PS3 would have murdered the 360 as well, giving Sony 4 straight generation wins. Well, i'll give the nod to Nintendo with the Wii because underpowered consoles that focus on games still count in my book. Could just be me though.
Agreed.
The 16-bit era was different.
Now it's focused on MS, Sony and sometimes Ninty. Nobody even talks about Ninty handhelds anymore.
Back then it was Sega and Ninty. They a bunch of handhelds, Neo Geo, game mags would still do pages on NEC/PC Engine here and there, CD players were a new thing, and broad-based gaming mags would have sections on arcade games.
So add it up, and the 16-bit era had more stuff to gab about. The jumps between current and new gadgets were large back then, now it's more subdued. Going from a crusty Genesis to a new gen system like PS1 was like night and day. So mags had tons of pages on specs and weird system architecture. Now, systems get better, but its more like a bump in cpu and gpu speeds. back then it was weird stuff, special graphics chips you'd never get in the PC world, dedicated audio chips etc...
Huh come again more than Bloodborne was in the top 10.
For example off the top of my head UC4 was at 10 million...
PS4 by far has the best exclusives this gen.