Yeah, he should have just put up a logo, or had a CG trailer made. That seems to be enough for people.
Better than nothing for 4 to 5 years...which is how it is going right now.
Yeah, he should have just put up a logo, or had a CG trailer made. That seems to be enough for people.
Spencer tells people what they want to hear. Exclusives aren't a priority and that is clear.
I'm sure they've crunched the numbers and the costs of making tons of AAA exclusives just doesn't work for them. Most exclusives end up being "meh" anyway. They seem way more important to console wars than to actual gamers. Everyone plays a few exclusives, but honestly I spend most of my time in multiplats. My only real big exclusive is the Forza games (as Sony seems to have little on that front at least for now).
COD, Overwatch, Destiny, sports games, RPGs, big multiplats is where most AAA games are. Give people the biggest piece of hardware to run those.
They haven't been since the latter part of the last gen and now the decent ones are not exclusive and can be played online for free on the PC.Spencer tells people what they want to hear. Exclusives aren't a priority and that is clear.
Yeah, he should have just put up a logo, or had a CG trailer made. That seems to be enough for people.
Most exclusives end up being "meh" anyway. They seem way more important to console wars than to actual gamers. Everyone plays a few exclusives, but honestly I spend most of my time in multiplats.
Because they want to announce games that are coming out before next E3. After all, at next E3 you can't very well announce games that have already been released. (*)
(*) Because I think Sony has that patented.
Blame philI'm getting a big kick reading this doom and gloom bulls*** though. Keep it up.
That's how dumb he is
They seemed like they were getting aggressive Pre E3 and I don't what happened at E3.I am starting to dislike Phil Spencer on how he is approaching the game console.
Being too nice going to get his ass in a jam and the company going to get rid of him for not being aggressive.
X is apart of that generation as well.I disagree. I think hes referencing it in the sense that XBOS and PS4 are old and of a particular generation. PS4 pro is that old generation at a higher res...yet not even a real res.
There were 3 or 4 games at E3 i saw that i can honestly say look a hardware iteration better then PS4/1S and neither of those has a hope in hell of matching those visuals even of they spent 10 years on development.
I also say this knowing those games will also be on both, just in a vastly inferior manor.
Microsoft can easily let the XBOX replace the One S as its follow up main console as it grows cheaper.
Sony will definitly have to release a PS5.
Right, because we'd never seen Crackdown, Sea of Thieves, or Cuphead before.
Yeah, he should have just put up a logo, or had a CG trailer made. That seems to be enough for people.
They seemed like they were getting aggressive Pre E3 and I don't what happened at E3.
They announced over 20 exclusives of some sort they just didn't announce the timed stuff while acting like it was a full exclusive.
Tell that to Phil who keeps saying exclusive
No it's not. We just don't know what else they have. You honestly believe there will only be Halo next year, or something? They do have games; they just may not be the ones you want, and that is fine.Better than nothing for 4 to 5 years...which is how it is going right now.
Yeah, he should have just put up a logo, or had a CG trailer made. That seems to be enough for people.
Read what I typed again - I was going a different angle, "announcing games that have already been released." FFVII, for example, a twenty year old game still is of course a reason Sony won last E3. Shadow of the Colossus was hailed this year, probably almost as much as it was back when it was actually originally released. I think (but I don't want to take the time to confirm) that they announced the Last of Us remaster at E3.
(Of course, MCC/Halo Anniversary/Gears and stuff happened too, not to mention backwards compatibility, but it stops being funny and starts being informative by that point and I'm not going for 'informative' ratings).
I've spent the last year and a half playing almost nothing but PS exclusives (minus a two-month break for Skyrim). That's not because I'm trying to score points in the console wars. It's because Sony offers games that interest me, and MS doesn't.
Exclusives matter. They even matter to "actual gamers," believe it or not.
Exclusives have always mattered, in every console generation. They are one of the main reasons people choose one console over another.