Since when did the hardware designers have ANYTHING to do with marketing? What is your point, even? They designed a console, not a PC. People mock the whole balance thing and that is an absolute joke to do so. Balance is the key to ANY good design, hardware, aechitecture, photography, you name it.Well the 'best mind' of the field did not know that having a huge price premium, having kinect & lower spec will affect sales & result in games of lower spec compare to competition, while your 'average' gamers have known these & called for them to act.
'Best mind' MS is now about 1/2 the sales of PS4. So much for 'best mind'.
So who are actually out of touch with reality?
Maybe MS should hire more 'average' people instead.
Anyway, as a senior developer, I can tell you its not just about how 'smart' the people are. Its about what you are given to work with, & also relative to the competition. You can give F1 world champion Vettel a golf 1.2, & he will not beat a another pro (that's isn't as good) driving a Golf GTi. MS hire top people, but Sony didn't hire idiots also.
Argentina did not lose to Germany in world cup final because they are not good, its just that Germany is better. More people bought PS4 over X1 not because X1 was bad, its just that most think Sony PS4 was better.
Its just combination of poor decisions & perhaps some arrogants & misleaded market studies by MS, plus Sony good decisions & effort that is the result of the hardware disparity & massive gulf in sales we have today.
It would seem to me that the dev software was behind, but to say the hardware is ill-designed when we are getting pairity while running the UI is pretty close-minded.
So how exactly were the lead designers out of touch? They care about people on the internet saying GDDR5 is better than special processors and eSRAM? Might they just be thinking more outside the box for a reason? I think it is frankly rediculous to think that they went with a more advanced method cuz well, it's more advanced. I guess we'll find out soon enough.