What's up with that fields level though, some sort of bottleneck somewhere in the Xbox system?
You really trying to spin this away?
It's a performance issue.I just don't know what you're trying to get at? The video literally says it drops to 40 frames in the field in one of the levels? Is this game changing for you?
On balance you are wrong. It’s not even close. Even PS5’s RDNA3 can’t make up the difference. XSX has to win by 20 across the board to have a true “win” in your mind. If IO lowered the resolution and just let the frames run then the XSX would be running circles around PS5.
It's a bug. Best support of that is that it's consistent across both consoles (S/X). Both consoles have different GPUs yet use same APIs, general code and CPU. They shouldn't struggle with frames equally in the exact same spot unless there's a bug or API issue. Fact that it's only one spot is the other sign.Interesting. So finally XSX has the resolution and high shadows advantage here. What's up with that fields level though, some sort of bottleneck somewhere in the Xbox system? Consistent drops to 50's and then in sniper zoom mode drops to 40fps while the PS5 is perfect holding 60FPS throughout. Just a case of the higher clocked GPU in the PS5 being able to maintain 60fps?
Will see if this is a bug as we hear more from other individuals that will be doing the comparisons too like VGTech and NXGamer to compare.
One has a better resolution and one has a better fps.On balance you are wrong. It’s not even close. Even PS5’s RDNA3 can’t make up the difference. XSX has to win by 20 across the board to have a true “win” in your mind. If IO lowered the resolution and just let the frames run then the XSX would be running circles around PS5.
It's a performance issue.It's a bug. Best support of that is that it's consistent across both consoles (S/X). Both consoles have different GPUs yet use same APIs, general code and CPU. They shouldn't struggle with frames equally in the exact same spot unless there's a bug or API issue. Fact that it's only one spot is the other sign.
I was told last week it would be a year before the Series X tools normalized to the point it's achieving it's potential in relation to how well the PS5 meets it's potential so this is kind of surprising. IOI may simply be a lot more proficient with Direct X. I don't think it means Xbox will win the rest of these faceoffs this year. Still going to take some time from what I was told directly by a developer.
Your sources? Influencers don't count as sources.It's a performance issue.
Resolution or shadows get reduced and it's improved my better sources tell me.
Huh 40 fps isn't minor.If both versions could run the same then they would. But IO felt the best version for PS5 was a quarter of the resolution, with less effects for a stable 60fps. IO also felt the best XSX version was upping the resolution and effects for some minor frame drops. In this faceoff PS5 just doesn’t have it to keep up.
Common sense is a better source then bs spin.Your sources? Influencers don't count as sources.
As I've said before, I'm not overly invested in performance delta. If PS5 won 100% of the face-offs by 50%, I'm still playing wherever Elite 2 can be used as a first option. Just giving some people a heads up to get off this ride based on what developers say behind the scenes. It's not why most buy PS5's anyways. It's the exclusives, Dual Sense, their friends or the UI. Don't make it about performance faceoffs long term. It's not going to end well. PS5 should still win it's share of faceoffs over the next 6 to 10 months but it'll flip for good after that.
Keep an eye on Battlefield this year...
The best sources are...
View attachment 4854
Oh lord....feel free to bookmark. Will be fun revisiting in a year.Common sense is a better source then bs spin.
BF will likely be marketed by MS so expect little extra umph.
Just like Activision and COD.
Almost as bad as one that can't hold 60fps lolz500 bucks for a next gen PS5 that can't do native 4K in last gen games. Lol.
Much waiting when it comes to Xbox eh?Oh lord....feel free to bookmark. Will be fun revisiting in a year.
So all of them then. Lol.Almost as bad as one that can't hold 60fps lolz
Dropping to 40 fps is lopsided but XSX has better resolution so it's not that bad.Yeah it is. This is the most lopsided faceoff yet. But I’m sure you like idea of a draw.
All of the Xbox Series consoles correct.So all of them then. Lol.
No I just don't think a drop in a small area is a big issue, if it was dropping frames all the time I would agree with you.It's a performance issue.
Worse than the PS5 version.
Both have negatives are you saying I'm wrong?
The PS5 must have run like dogs*** to force a massive res drop and lower shadows.All of the Xbox Series consoles correct.
60fps>40fpsThe PS5 must have run like dogs*** to force a massive res drop and lower shadows.
One out of the 6 levels is significant especially since it's 40 fps with lower details while aiming.No I just don't think a drop in a small area is a big issue, if it was dropping frames all the time I would agree with you.
Does seem odd it drops frames in that area and not in a bustling crowded area or that night level with all the lighting.
Solid 60 fps when zooming in>A drop to 40 fps AND lower details when zooming in.4K >1800p
High shadows > medium shadows.