Not sure how anybody is drawing comparisons when gameplay has not been seen. But that comparison is dumb.I am seeing complaints by people calling it "Battlefield Legends". I've only played a few games of Apex Legends, so I can't really comment on the comparisons.
I like it. It allows you to adapt on fly. That will be important on these big maps.Not sure I'm digging that idea.
Seems to destroy the choice and consequence of loadouts turning every player into a one man army.
The devlopers must be watching too much Bollywood movies. This looks stright out of a bollywood movie.
The devlopers must be watching too much Bollywood movies. This looks stright out of a bollywood movie.
Looks like that, but This really happened in BF 4 game. I forgot the name of the guy that did it, but it’s a famous clip in the community.
I’m gonna guess and say “marketing rights”?At Microsoft?
What does that mean?
The bots are just place holders incase it struggles to fill the 128 player count quickly enough.I am listening to the Kind of Funny Xcast. I must have totally missed the bots on the map like Titanfall?
Do you have to gain in game points in order to call in vehicles similar to titanfall or the OG homefront?
The AI in titanfall was just to expedite getting your titan quicker.
I am listening to the Kind of Funny Xcast. I must have totally missed the bots on the map like Titanfall?
Do you have to gain in game points in order to call in vehicles similar to titanfall or the OG homefront?
The AI in titanfall was just to expedite getting your titan quicker.
Ah I see. thank.People are assuming that due to the size of the maps and player count, the AI will be used to fill empty slots until others join so the maps don't feel empty.
You can also create your own server and play excusevly against & with AI if you'd like.
I'd take a BF Titanfall cross over mode. 64 player conquest with Titans and wallrunning.Ah I see. thank.
I thought Vince Zampella or however you spell it was bringing some Titanfall ideas over haha.
Me too. It would be more like BF 2142, but with wall running.I'd take a BF Titanfall cross over mode. 64 player conquest with Titans and wallrunning.
Like BF2142 but good.Me too. It would be more like BF 2142, but with wall running.
I think that would be good for future DLC. It totally make sense. Doubt EA would go that far as being creative.Like BF2142 but good.
I think they have wanted to do this for years in Apex Legends. I think BF2042 is a better arena for it.I think that would be good for future DLC. It totally make sense. Doubt EA would go that far as being creative.
If COD is WW2 again this year and if the rumors that the game has had a struggling development is true... then this is the year BF could come out on top and steal some of that COD crowd.With COD going WW2, they made the right call going modern (not really all that future).
That higher speed stuff works better on smaller scale games.
going modern (not really all that future).
I just think BF might be on the right track again finally. All the maps seem to be mixing vehicle warfare and infantry warfare without catering more to one or the other. BFV leaned way too much in favour of infantry v infantry.If COD is WW2 again this year and if the rumors that the game has had a struggling development is true... then this is the year BF could come out on top and steal some of that COD crowd.
I didn’t want future. Future like robots, wall running, jet packs, etc.Yeah, I thought it was odd people were mad this was set in the "future". Only 21 years, all of the weapons and vehicles are things that already exist or are being developed right now.. BF4 was set 13 years in the future from when it was released, apparently that 8 fake year difference is too much for gamers.